RESUMO
Introduction: COVID-19 lockdowns, shelter in place, closures of transportation and mental health services, and dearth of mental health providers created new barriers to obtaining support for mental health needs at a time of increased rates of anxiety and depression. During the pandemic, a record number of households owned and adopted pets, opening a potential avenue to investigate the relationship between pets and mental health. This systematic literature review examined the question: What is the evidence for a relationship between human-animal interaction and/or animal ownership and common mental disorders among adults who interacted with pets compared to adults who did not during the COVID-19 pandemic? Methods: To address this question, four databases were searched: Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for peer-reviewed literature published between 2020 and July 2023. Of the 1,746 articles identified by the searches, 21 studies were included in this review. Results: Results suggest that there exists a relationship between animal ownership and strong pet attachment and pet interaction, though the directionality of the relationship was not investigated by the included studies. There was an association between having a stronger relationship with a pet and lower feelings of depression and other mental health symptoms. There was also evidence of an association between anxiety and higher levels of animal attachment. Conclusion: Understanding the association between human-animal interaction and common mental disorders may be helpful to clinicians assessing the mental health of clients. Clinicians may glean additional insight about stressors, risk factors, social supports, and lifestyle of clients based on the client's status as a pet owner. Future research could further explore the direction of the causal relationship of human-animal interaction and/or animal ownership on common mental disorders; this could further inform how the HAI relationship can be used to support clients with mental health struggles.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: MiLES is a web-based intervention targeted at managers with the aim of enhancing the successful return to work (RTW) of employees with cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to and facilitators of implementing MiLES in organizations, from a manager's perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MiLES was implemented as a pilot in four organizations for six weeks. Sixteen managers were included, of which fourteen were interviewed regarding their perceived barriers to and facilitators of implementation of MiLES in their organization. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed with content analysis. RESULTS: The managers experienced barriers to and facilitators of implementation related to: (1) implementation responsibilities, (2) the intervention's content, and (3) organizational characteristics. Regarding implementation responsibilities, management board approval and an organizational infrastructure with distinct described implementation responsibilities were perceived as facilitators. Regarding the intervention's content, its accessibility, user-friendliness and completeness were perceived as facilitators. If the content did not meet the manager's specific needs, this was perceived as a barrier. Regarding organizational characteristics, several intangible (e.g., added value of MiLES within different organizations) and tangible (e.g., integration into absenteeism registration) organizational characteristics were perceived as facilitators. The absence of a quiet place to use MiLES was perceived as barrier. CONCLUSION: Implementation of MiLES in organizations may benefit from an infrastructure within the organization that defines responsibilities regarding intervention delivery to managers of employees with cancer. Such an infrastructure should be aligned to existing organizational structures. As per interviewed managers, MiLES has added value in diverse organizations.
Assuntos
Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Neoplasias , Humanos , Retorno ao Trabalho , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
Introduction: Workplace mental health stigma is a major problem as it can lead to adverse occupational outcomes and reduced well-being. Although workplace climate is largely determined by managers and co-workers, the role of co-workers in workplace stigma is understudied. Therefore, the aims are: (1) to examine knowledge and attitudes towards having a coworker with Mental Health Issues or Illness (MHI), especially concerning the desire for social distance, (2) to identify distinct subgroups of workers based on their potential concerns towards having a coworker with MHI, and (3) to characterize these subgroups in terms of knowledge, attitudes, and background characteristics. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a nationally representative internet panel of 1,224 Dutch workers who had paid jobs and did not hold management positions. Descriptive statistics and a three-step approach Latent Class Analysis (LCA) were used to address the research aims. Results: Concerning the desire for social distance, 41.9% of Dutch workers indicated they did not want to have a close colleague with MHI, and 64.1% did not want to work for a higher-ranking manager who had MHI. In contrast however, most workers did not have negative experiences with interacting with coworkers with MHI (92.6%). Next, five distinct subgroups (SG) of workers were identified: two subgroups with few concerns towards having a coworker with MHI (SG1 and SG2; 51.8% of the respondents), one subgroup with average concerns (SG3; 22.7% of the respondents), and two subgroups with more concerns (SG4 and SG5; 25.6% of the respondents). Four out of five subgroups showed a high tendency towards the desire for social distance. Nevertheless, even in the subgroups with more concerns, (almost) half of the respondents were willing to learn more about how to best deal with coworkers with MHI. No significant differences were found between the subgroups on background characteristics. Discussion: The high tendency to the desire for social distance seems to contrast with the low number of respondents who personally had negative experiences with workers with MHI in the workplace. This suggests that the tendency to socially exclude this group was not based on their own experience. The finding that a large group of respondents indicated to want to learn more about how to deal with a co-worker with MHI is promising. Destigmatizing interventions in the workplace are needed in order to create more inclusive workplaces to improve sustained employment of people with MHI. These interventions should focus on increasing the knowledge of workers about how to best communicate and deal with coworkers with MHI, they do not need to differentiate in background variables of workers.
RESUMO
Work is a key contributor to quality of life and an important aspect of cancer survivorship. We call attention to current topics in cancer survivorship and work with 12 articles on cancer survivorship and work in this special section. The focus is on less studied diagnostic groups such as gastrointestinal cancer and prostate cancer, and on long-term effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment on work. Furthermore, studies are included on topics not generally studied including cognitive limitations and pain, the role of the employer on work outcomes among different types of cancer survivors and some countries not typically covered in the existing literature on work and cancer survivorship. We conclude that to improve sustainable work participation in cancer survivors, personalised, tailored interventions should be provided. A prerequisite for this is the identification of groups and individuals at high risk for adverse work outcomes. In order to develop such interventions, research involving new approaches such as matching data registries, participatory approaches and the involvement of many stakeholders and survivors with these different types of cancer diagnoses is necessary. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The goal of sustainable work participation in cancer survivors can be improved by the delivery of a personalised or risk-based tailored intervention. Furthermore, successful work outcomes often involve many stakeholders who should all be included Implications for Cancer Survivors. The goal of sustainable work participation in cancer survivors can be improved by the delivery of a personalised or risk-based tailored intervention. Furthermore, successful work outcomes often involve many stakeholders who should all be included.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Sobrevivência , Trabalho/normas , HumanosRESUMO
Global inequity in access to and availability of essential mental health services is well recognized. The mental health treatment gap is approximately 50% in all countries, with up to 90% of people in the lowest-income countries lacking access to required mental health services. Increased investment in global mental health (GMH) has increased innovation in mental health service delivery in LMICs. Situational analyses in areas where mental health services and systems are poorly developed and resourced are essential when planning for research and implementation, however, little guidance is available to inform methodological approaches to conducting these types of studies. This scoping review provides an analysis of methodological approaches to situational analysis in GMH, including an assessment of the extent to which situational analyses include equity in study designs. It is intended as a resource that identifies current gaps and areas for future development in GMH. Formative research, including situational analysis, is an essential first step in conducting robust implementation research, an essential area of study in GMH that will help to promote improved availability of, access to and reach of mental health services for people living with mental illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While strong leadership in this field exists, there remain significant opportunities for enhanced research representing different LMICs and regions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a significant proportion of workers with mental disorders who either are struggling at work or who are trying to return to work from a disability leave. OBJECTIVE: Using a population-based survey of working adults in Ontario, Canada, this paper examines the perceptions of workers towards mental disorders in the workplace. METHODS: Data are from a sample of 2219 working adults identified through random digit dialing who either completed a telephone questionnaire administered by professional interviewers or a web-based survey. RESULTS: A third of workers would not tell their managers if they experienced mental health problems. Rather than a single factor, workers more often identified a combination of factors that would encourage disclosure to their managers. One of the most identified disincentives was the fear of damaging their careers. The most pervasive reasons for concerns about a colleague with a mental health problem included safety and the colleague's reliability. CONCLUSION: Although critical for workers who experience a mental disorder and who find work challenging, a significant proportion do not seek support. One barrier is fear of negative repercussions. Organizations' policies can create safe environments and the provision of resources and training to managers that enable them to implement them. By making disclosure safe, stigma and the burden of mental disorders in the workplace can be decreased.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Revelação da Verdade , Adolescente , Adulto , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Medo , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Retorno ao Trabalho/psicologia , Classe Social , Estereotipagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost and performance implications of introducing cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing within modeled scenarios in a publicly funded Canadian provincial Down syndrome (DS) prenatal screening program. METHOD: Two clinical algorithms were created: the first to represent the current screening program and the second to represent one that incorporates cffDNA testing. From these algorithms, eight distinct scenarios were modeled to examine: (1) the current program (no cffDNA), (2) the current program with first trimester screening (FTS) as the nuchal translucency-based primary screen (no cffDNA), (3) a program substituting current screening with primary cffDNA, (4) contingent cffDNA with current FTS performance, (5) contingent cffDNA at a fixed price to result in overall cost neutrality,(6) contingent cffDNA with an improved detection rate (DR) of FTS, (7) contingent cffDNA with higher uptake of FTS, and (8) contingent cffDNA with optimized FTS (higher uptake and improved DR). RESULTS: This modeling study demonstrates that introducing contingent cffDNA testing improves performance by increasing the number of cases of DS detected prenatally, and reducing the number of amniocenteses performed and concomitant iatrogenic pregnancy loss of pregnancies not affected by DS. Costs are modestly increased, although the cost per case of DS detected is decreased with contingent cffDNA testing. CONCLUSION: Contingent models of cffDNA testing can improve overall screening performance while maintaining the provision of an 11- to 13-week scan. Costs are modestly increased, but cost per prenatally detected case of DS is decreased.
Assuntos
DNA/análise , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Feto/química , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/economia , Análise de Sequência de DNA/economia , Adulto , Amniocentese/economia , Amniocentese/métodos , Amniocentese/estatística & dados numéricos , Gonadotropina Coriônica Humana Subunidade beta/análise , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , DNA/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Idade Materna , Medição da Translucência Nucal/economia , Medição da Translucência Nucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Ontário , Gravidez , Proteína Plasmática A Associada à Gravidez/análise , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , Análise de Sequência de DNA/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staff who support adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) are exposed to challenging behaviour in their work including client aggression. Exposure to aggressive behaviour has been associated with staff stress and burnout. Study samples have been small however, and there has been very little data exploring this issue among North American staff. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey which included demographics, measures of frequency and severity (including perceived severity and a standardised severity score) of exposure to client aggression and the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) was completed by 926 community staff who support adults with ID in Ontario, Canada. Relationships between demographic variables and exposure to aggression were examined with descriptive statistics. Pearson correlations were used to analyse exposure variables and MBI-HSS scores. RESULTS: Nearly all staff reported being exposed to client aggression in the prior 6 months. Mean MBI-HSS scores were comparable to previously published data in similar populations with the exception of a higher score in the personal accomplishment domain. All measures of exposure to aggression were significantly positively correlated with MBI-HSS scores in the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation dimensions of burnout. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of burnout in this North American sample is comparable to what has been reported in similar populations in other locations, although these staff may have a higher sense of accomplishment with regard to their work. Findings from this large sample support the evidence that exposure to client aggression affects staff emotional well-being but is by no means the only important factor. Further study is needed to explore the differences and similarities reported here as well as other contributing factors which will guide the implementation of effective strategies to improve staff well-being.
Assuntos
Agressão/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Deficiência Intelectual/psicologia , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , OntárioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the relationship between perceived responsibilities by workers and job characteristics and experiences of stress. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between job stress and work responsibilities and job characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2737 adults who were labor force participants in the province of Alberta, Canada. A logistic regression model was employed to examine factors associated with high job stress. RESULTS: About 18% of the studied workers considered their job as being "highly stressful." Workers who were male, did not consider their job a career or who were highly satisfied with their jobs were significantly less likely to identify their jobs as "highly stressful." The probability of describing a job as "highly stressful" significantly increased as workers perceived their actions have an affect on those around them or when their jobs required additional or variable hours. CONCLUSION: A number of factors are associated with experiencing high work stress including being more engaged with work. This is an important finding for employers, offering insight into where interventions may be targeted.
Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Percepção , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Alberta , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Fatores Sexuais , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Psychological trauma in the workplace is gaining recognition as an important cause of workplace disability but little is known about the workers who are affected. The Psychological Trauma Program (PTP) in Toronto (Canada) is a specialized provincial worker's compensation board assessment program for workers with psychological sequelae of workplace trauma. AIMS: To characterize workers presenting to the PTP in terms of demographic, occupational, traumatic exposure and diagnostic variables. METHODS: A retrospective secondary analysis of all workers referred to the PTP for assessment within 1 year of traumatic event between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Five hundred and thiry-one referred workers were included in the study. Most workers were working-age male (76%), married (65%) and labourers (43%). Nearly half were born outside Canada. Post-traumatic stress disorder was the primary diagnosis in 44%. Fifty-eight percent had one or more secondary diagnoses. For just over half of the workers, the traumatic event resulted in a permanent physical impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist referral may be indicated for workers experiencing prolonged recovery following workplace trauma. Male workers and those with co-morbidities or permanent injuries may be more likely to require referral. Individualized treatment approaches are likely important; however, more research is needed to guide future interventions.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho/psicologia , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/reabilitação , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/reabilitação , Acidentes de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are few longitudinal studies investigating the risk of major depression by socioeconomic status (SES). In this study, data from the longitudinal cohort of Canadian National Population Health Survey were used to estimate the risk of major depressive episode (MDE) over 6 years by SES levels. METHODS: The National Population Health Survey used a nationally representative sample of the Canadian general population. In this analysis, participants (n=9589) were followed from 2000/2001 (baseline) to 2006/2007. MDE was assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview--Short Form for Major Depression. RESULTS: Low education level (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.69) and financial strain (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.28) were associated with an increased risk of MDE in participants who worked in the past 12 months. In those who did not work in the past 12 months, participants with low education were at a lower risk of MDE (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.76), compared with those with high education. Financial strain was not associated with MDE in participants who did not work. Working men who reported low household income (12.9%) and participants who did not work and reported low personal income (5.4%) had a higher incidence of MDE than others. CONCLUSIONS: SES inequalities in the risk of MDE exist in the general population. However, the inequalities may depend on measures of SES, sex and employment status. These should be considered in interventions of reducing inequalities in MDE. MDE history is an important factor in studies examining inequalities in MDE.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Escolaridade , Classe Social , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Canadá/epidemiologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações/economia , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
This paper presents a comprehensive measure of the incremental economic burden of mental illness in Canada which incorporates the use of medical resources and productivity losses due to long-term and short-term disability, as well as reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), for the diagnosed and undiagnosed population with mental illness. The analysis was based on the population-based Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 2.1 (2003). For all persons, we measured all health services utilization, longterm and short-term work loss, and health-related quality of life and their dollar valuations, with the economic burden being the difference in dollar measures between the populations with and without mental health problems. In total, the economic burden was $51 billion in 2003. Over one-half was due to reductions in HRQOL. The current accepted practice in economic assessments is to include changes in medical resource use, work loss, and reductions in HRQOL.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/classificação , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Although prescription drug prices are lower in Canada than in the United States, trends indicate that there has nevertheless been a steep increase in expenditures on psychotropic drugs. Between 1992 and 1998, such expenditures increased by 216 percent; 61 percent of these expenditures were on antidepressants, 33 percent on antipsychotics, and less than 7 percent on anxiolytics. Most of the increase in costs in Canada is attributable to a greater use of newer agents and the higher prices of these agents. These trends are a reminder not only that the use of newer, more expensive psychotherapeutic agents has become a widely embraced part of care but also that lower drug prices do not necessarily insulate a health care system from rising expenditures. The authors' findings prompt the questions of whether the use of these newer agents meets practice guidelines and whether there are ways to control the increases in drug expenditures while ensuring high-quality care.
Assuntos
Honorários Farmacêuticos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Psicotrópicos/economia , Controle de Custos , Uso de Medicamentos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , OntárioRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To consider the most common primary care reimbursement structures, to identify incentives inherent in each, and to discuss how each could be used to encourage a shared-care approach to treating mental disorders at the primary care level. METHOD: Three major financial reimbursement models--fee-for-service, capitation, and blended payment mechanisms--are examined. Each is considered in terms of its risk-sharing elements and the consequent incentives. We offer several scenarios to illustrate how the shared-care practice model might be encouraged under each financing mechanism. RESULTS: The current fee-for-service system does not encourage shared care. For wide adoption of the shared-care practice model, there must be a change in the reimbursement system's incentives. While none of the financing mechanisms offers a perfect solution, each has potential. Each, however, must be carefully tailored to its environment. CONCLUSIONS: Financial considerations are just one aspect to achieving shared care. Nevertheless, in designing a system to encourage collaborative, coordinated care for those suffering from mental illness, decision makers should be wary of creating or maintaining obstacles (financial or otherwise) to provision of accessible, high-quality care.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Canadá , Capitação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as antidepressant therapy has increased considerably since the introduction of fluoxetine in 1989. By 1999, 3 of the 4 available SSRIs were among the top 10 most frequently used drugs in the United States. In addition, SSRIs were one of the major contributors to the growth in psychotropic medication expenditures during the past 5 years. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to examine the utilization patterns of the 4 most commonly used SSRIs and their contribution to rising antidepressant medication expenditures among claimants in a publicly funded drug program. Using the results of forecasting models, we explored possible ways to control these growing expenditures. METHODS: Cross-sectional antidepressant claims and expenditure data from the Ontario Drug Benefits program for 1992 to 1998 were examined. Five scenarios were modeled in which future SSRI expenditures and claims were predicted using exponential smoothing models. RESULTS: If the historical patterns of use continued, a 20% increase in the 1998 level of expenditures was expected to occur by the year 2000. Predicted expenditures are sensitive to the composition of the SSRI claims. Exclusive use of 1 of the 4 major SSRIs (fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline) could decrease projected expenditures by 30% or increase them by 11%. An "equal shares" approach, in which each of the 4 SSRIs are used in equal proportions in the population, may reduce expenditures by approximately 8%. CONCLUSIONS: The current trends in the utilization data suggest that sertraline and paroxetine are being used as first-line treatments. The results of the forecasting models suggest that growing expenditures could be curbed if these 2 antidepressants were not used in that manner. Short of limiting the drugs available on benefit formularies, there may be a way to control costs through the use of a prescribing algorithm. Although our results support the use of fluoxetine for first-line SSRI treatment as a cost-control measure, we do not definitively recommend its adoption. These findings contribute to the discussion about using fixed versus flexible formularies as a potential cost-control mechanism.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/economia , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/economia , Adulto , Antidepressivos/economia , Estudos Transversais , Fluoxetina/economia , Fluvoxamina/economia , Previsões , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/tendências , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Ontário , Paroxetina/economia , Sertralina/economiaRESUMO
While agreement is growing that mental illness burdens the North American economy, how it impacts productivity--particularly compared to physical illness--is unclear. Hypothesizing that lost work days are only the tip of the iceberg, we also examined the association of mental and chronic physical illness with partial work days and days requiring extra effort to function. Data from 4225 employed individuals, aged 18-54, were analyzed. These were a subset of respondents to the Ontario Health Survey's Mental Health Supplement, a 1990/91 epidemiologic survey of households across Ontario, Canada. Psychiatric disorder was assessed using the University of Michigan' modification of WHO's Composite International Diagnostic Interview (UM-CIDI). Similar to US reports, professional/managerial groups had lower rates of affective and anxiety disorders and fewer disability days compared to the rest of the workforce. However, no single occupational group was consistently at greater risk for either physical or psychiatric problems. Even after accounting for sociodemographic characteristics and work conditions, mental and physical status had clear, but different, impacts on productivity. Physical conditions alone had a fairly constant effect across all types of disability days and were the largest contributor to total work day loss. They also significantly impacted partial and extra effort days but were far less important than conditions involving a mental disorder. Respondents with mental health problems, either alone or in combination with physical illnesses, appeared more likely to go to work but to require greater effort to function. WHO projects that mental illness will become the second most important cause of global disease burden in the next century. Our findings suggest that among working individuals, it affects productivity more subtly than does physical illness. However, with an estimated eight percent of Ontario's workforce experiencing more than two months annually of decreased productivity, it still incurs significant social and economic costs.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Eficiência , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Ontário/epidemiologia , Análise de Regressão , Risco , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
In spite of the net social benefits of childhood vaccines, a substantial proportion of American children do not receive their full complement of immunizations by their second birthday. Designing policies and programs that increase the rate of completed immunizations in preschool children requires an understanding of the factors which contribute to the timely receipt of immunizations. In this paper, we estimate a model of demand for immunizations for preschool children. Our results suggest that household resources, the child's usual source of care, and other "convenience factors" significantly influence the successful completion of the immunization schedule.
Assuntos
Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Baltimore , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Medicaid , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of two methods of meeting the information needs of families of critically ill patients: an open visiting hour policy and a family information booklet. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a university medical center. SUBJECTS: Family members (N = 147) of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of an open visiting hour policy and information booklet. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to family members 24 to 48 hours after the patient's admission. The questionnaire addressed family satisfaction with having specific information needs met and posed questions that tested their knowledge of unit policies and personnel. The questionnaire was distributed to three groups: families who had restricted visiting hours and no booklet (group 1, n = 48), families who had open visiting hours but no booklet (group 2, n = 50), and families who had open visiting hours and an information booklet (Group 3, n = 49). Implementation of an open visiting hour policy increased family satisfaction. Families exposed to both the open visiting hours and the information booklet were more knowledgeable about specific details than were those exposed to only the open visiting hour policy. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible visiting hours and information booklets were two practical methods of meeting the information needs of families. Open visiting hours, as a singular intervention, significantly improved family satisfaction. The effectiveness of the booklet in assisting families to recall discrete pieces of information supports the further development and use of preprinted materials to assist in meeting family information needs.