Surgical decision-making among patients with uncontrolled epilepsy: "Making important decisions about my brain, which I happen to love".

OBJECTIVE: To explore decision-making from patients' perceptions of risks and benefits of epilepsy surgery for refractory focal seizures. METHODS: Using constructivist grounded theory, in-person interviews were conducted with 35 adults with refractory focal epilepsy who were undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation or who had consented for surgery. RESULTS: For this sample of participants decision-making about surgery was complex, centering on the meaning of illness for the self and the impact of epilepsy and its treatment for significant others. Two interrelated categories crystalized from our data: the unique context of brain surgery and how the decisional counterweights of risks and benefits were considered. DISCUSSION: Exploring components of decision-making from the patients' perspective afforded an opportunity to describe thought processes intrinsic to how people with drug-resistant epilepsy weighed their treatment options. Tensions were evident in how decisions were made. We use the analogy of an imaginary tightrope-walker to create a visual image of what patients face as they consider the illness experience (past and present), their hopes for the future, and the simultaneous uncertainty centered around balancing the counterweights of treatment risks and benefits.

Surgical Decision-Making for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Patient Experiences of the Informed Consent Process.

Background: Surgical resection is frequently the recommended treatment for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), yet many factors play a role in patients' perceptions of brain surgery that ultimately impact decision-making. The purpose of the current study was to explore how people with epilepsy, in their own words, experienced the overall process of consenting to surgery for drug-resistant TLE. Methods and Materials: Data was drawn from in-person, semi-structured interviews of 19 adults with drug-resistant TLE eligible to undergo epilepsy surgery. A systematic thematic analysis was performed to code, sort and compare participant responses. The mean age of these 12 (63%) women and seven (37%) men was 37.6 years (18-68 years), with average duration of epilepsy of 13 years (2-30 years). Results: Meeting the neurosurgeon and consenting to surgery represented an important treatment milestone across a prolonged treatment trajectory. Four themes were identified: (1) Understanding the language of risk; (2) Overcoming risk; (3) Family-centered, shared decision-making, and (4) Building decisional-confidence. Conclusion: Despite living with the restrictions of chronic uncontrolled seizures, considering an elective brain procedure raised unique and complex questions. Personal beliefs and expectations related to treatment outcomes influenced how the consent process was ultimately experienced. Decisions to pursue surgery had frequently been made ahead of meeting the surgeon, with many describing the act of signing as personally empowering. Overall, satisfaction was expressed with the information provided during the surgical visit, despite later inaccurate recall of the facts. These findings support the resultant recommendation that the practice of informed consent be conceptualized as a systematic, structured interdisciplinary process which occurs over time and encompasses three stages: preparation, signing and follow-up after signing.

Reciprocal burden: Adults with drug-resistant epilepsy reflect upon informal caregiver support.

PURPOSE: To explore how a sample of people with uncontrolled seizures describe their experiences of receiving informal supportive care. METHODS: Using constructivist grounded theory, in-person, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 35 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. These 20 (57%) women and 15 (43%) men were aged 18-68 years (mean= 35.6 years), with a range of verbal comprehension scores. The majority, 28 (80%) lived in nuclear family settings. RESULTS: Unpredictable seizures disrupted personal autonomy and generated unique challenges for everyday life. While supportive care was deemed necessary to survival, subjective reflections around the implications of care-receiving and caregiving, were ultimately experienced as mutually burdensome. Four dynamic and interactive dimensions revealed a mirrored, interactive perspective of what it meant to be a care-recipient: assuming responsibility; protecting and supervising; acknowledging reliance and setting boundaries. Care-recipience was not one-sided, but included actively hiding personal struggles as a way to shield the caregiver from the emotional and physical demands of caregiving. Relationship dynamics between caregivers and care-recipients played a major role in treatment decision-making. A clinically useful Theory of Reciprocal Burden resulted from our study. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds an explanatory dimension to the concept of illness burden from the perspective of care-recipients. Relationship dynamics play a key role in patient-centered epilepsy care, with clinical implications for guiding supportive caregiving, fostering independence and promoting self-management strategies.

Factors associated with delay to video-EEG in dissociative seizures.

PURPOSE: While certain clinical factors suggest a diagnosis of dissociative seizures (DS), otherwise known as functional or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), ictal video-electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic delays were associated with worse quality of life and more seizures, even after treatment. To understand why diagnoses were delayed, we evaluated which factors were associated with delay to VEM. METHODS: Using data from 341 consecutive patients with VEM-documented dissociative seizures, we used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) and multiple imputation of some missing data to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors were associated with time from first dissociative seizure to VEM. RESULTS: The mean delay to VEM was 8.4 years (median 3 years, IQR 1-10 years). In the RFE multivariate model, the factors associated with longer delay to VEM included more past antiseizure medications (0.19 log-years/medication, standard error (SE) 0.05), more medications for other medical conditions (0.06 log-years/medication, SE 0.03), history of physical abuse (0.75 log-years, SE 0.27), and more seizure types (0.36 log-years/type, SE 0.11). Factors associated with shorter delay included active employment or student status (-1.05 log-years, SE 0.21) and higher seizure frequency (0.14 log-years/log[seizure/month], SE 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater medical and seizure complexity had longer delays. Delays in multiple domains of healthcare can be common for victims of physical abuse. Unemployed and non-student patients may have had more barriers to access VEM. These results support earlier referral of complex cases to a comprehensive epilepsy center.

Epilepsy, dissociative seizures, and mixed: Associations with time to video-EEG.

PURPOSE: Video-electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM) is a core component to the diagnosis and evaluation of epilepsy and dissociative seizures (DS)-also known as functional or psychogenic seizures-but VEM evaluation often occurs later than recommended. To understand why delays occur, we compared how patient-reported clinical factors were associated with time from first seizure to VEM (TVEM) in patients with epilepsy, DS or mixed. METHODS: We acquired data from 1245 consecutive patients with epilepsy, VEM-documented DS or mixed epilepsy and DS. We used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors interacting with patients' diagnoses were associated with TVEM. RESULTS: The mean and median TVEM were 14.6 years and 10 years, respectively (IQR 3-23 years). In the multivariate RFE model, the factors associated with longer TVEM in all patients included unemployment and not student status, more antiseizure medications (current and past), concussion, and ictal behavior suggestive of temporal lobe epilepsy. Average TVEM was shorter for DS than epilepsy, particularly for patients with depression, anxiety, migraines, and eye closure. Average TVEM was longer specifically for patients with DS taking more medications, more seizure types, non-metastatic cancer, and with other psychiatric comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In all patients with seizures, trials of numerous antiseizure medications, unemployment and non-student status was associated with longer TVEM. These associations highlight a disconnect between International League Against Epilepsy practice parameters and observed referral patterns in epilepsy. In patients with dissociative seizures, some but not all factors classically associated with DS reduced TVEM.

Perceptions of illness severity in adults with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore how subjective perceptions of illness severity were described by a sample of participants with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who were considering surgery. METHODS: A qualitative methodology, constructivist grounded theory, guided all aspects of the study. Data were collected via 51 semi-structured interviews with 35 adults in our multiethnic sample. At interview, the 20 women (57%) and 15 men (43%) ranged in age from 18 to 68 years (mean = 35.6 years) and had lived with epilepsy for an average of 15.4 y (range = 2-44 years). RESULTS: A grounded theory with four interrelated categories was developed to reflect the process by which participants arrived at an explanation of illness severity. Illness severity for participants evolved as participants reflected upon the burdensome impact of uncontrolled seizures on self and others. Epilepsy, when compared with other chronic conditions, was described as less serious, and participants imagined that other peoples' seizures were comparatively worse than their own. Illness severity was not uppermost in participants' minds but emerged as a concept that was both relative and linked to social burden. Perceptions of overall disease severity expanded upon determinants of seizure severity to offer a more complete explanation of what patients themselves did about longstanding, uncontrolled epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of illness severity played a vital role in treatment decision-making with the potential to impact the illness trajectory. How to measure components of illness severity represents a new challenge for outcomes research in DRE.

Perceptions of epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and an explanatory model of decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Clear evidence supports the benefits of surgery over medical therapy for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Surgical procedures meet the needs of fewer than 2% of those eligible. Referral to a tertiary epilepsy center early in the course of disease is recommended; however, patients live with disabling and life-threatening seizures for an average of 22years before considering surgical treatment. Reasons for this treatment gap are unclear. PURPOSE: A critical analysis of the literature addressing perceptions of surgical treatment for epilepsy is placed in the context of a brief history and current treatment guidelines. Common conceptual themes shaping perceptions of epilepsy surgery are identified. DATA SOURCES: Data sources used for this study were PubMed-MEDLINE and PsycINFO from 2003 to December 2013; hand searches of reference lists. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine papers that addressed patient perceptions of surgery for epilepsy and three papers addressing physician attitudes were reviewed. Treatment misperceptions held by both patients and physicians lead to undertreatment and serious health consequences. Fear of surgery, ignorance of treatment options, and tolerance of symptoms emerge as a triad of responses central to weighing treatment risks and benefits and, ultimately, to influencing treatment decision-making. Our novel explanatory framework serves to illustrate and explain relationships among contributory factors. LIMITATION: Comparisons across studies are limited by the heterogeneity of study populations and by the fact that no instrument has been developed to consistently measure disability in refractory focal epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Exploring the components of decision-making for the management of refractory focal epilepsy from the patient's perspective presents a new angle on a serious contemporary challenge in epilepsy care and may lead to explanation as to why there is reluctance to embrace a safe and effective treatment.