Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Orthop ; 58(5): 550-557, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694691

RESUMO

Introduction: Patients visiting for Knee Arthroplasty have often been treated at neighborhood clinics and bonesetters. India floated world's largest publicly funded national health insurance program -AB-PMJAY covering Knee Arthroplasty. AB-PMJAY's data for Arthroplasty has not been published. Methods: A Prospective study from Jan 2016- Jan 2023 on females undergoing TKA. Age, DEXA Score, Walking Ability, KSS, 10MWT, SF36 Scores, Funding Pattern before and after AB-PMJAY, Time to Approval, Time to discharge, Time to Query reply and Rejection Rates were documented. Results: 790 patients (91.86%) received treatment previously. 650 (78.54%) patients lived with family & 32 patients lost to follow-up. 37.67% & 62.32% patients had Grade. 3 & 4 osteoarthritis respectively. Commonest comorbidity was Vitamin D deficiency followed by Menopause and Hypertension. Post-treatment Vitamin D deficiency reduced from 68.59% to 2.17% at 3 months. Post-surgery, Functional Scores improved significantly at 1st and 6th month. VAS dropped significantly from 7.8 to 3.6 at 1st month follow up. At 6 months, 81.52% patients were independent outdoor walkers compared to 9.42% (baseline). Average hospital stay-54 hours and Return to work- 42 days. Central health scheme beneficiaries rose significantly from 12% (pre-PMJAY) to 42% (post-PMJAY). With AB-PMJAY, no rejection for surgical procedures, Time to surgery approval was 16 hours (mean) and Time to Discharge was 8 hours (mean). Time to reply was 6 hours (mean). Conclusion: Evident rise in patients getting TKA done through AB-PMJAY. TKA has become an affordable and achievable target for financially deprived patients, post regulation of knee implant prices & AB-PMJAY.

2.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 13(7): 110-115, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37521391

RESUMO

Introduction: Venous malformations are rare lesions of unknown etiology, with a reported incidence of 0.8-1%. Patients with inexorable growth and expansion of vascular malformations, or" have an unpredictable clinical course and a wide range of presenting symptoms. Often, they are erroneously diagnosed and inadequately treated due to their rarity and lack of expertise among clinicians. To author's information this is the first report of diffuse venous malformations with multiple phleboliths involving various compartments of the upper extremity in children. Case Report: The uthors discuss the clinical presentation, evaluation, and treatment over 8 months of slow-flow venous malformations with phleboliths in an11-year-old girl presenting with multiple painful swellings throughout her right upper extremity. The right upper extremity had multiple swellings over the right hand, forearm, arm, and shoulder region involving multiple compartments. The digital swellings had bluish discoloration, indicating a vascular nature. Blood tests revealed a raised D-dimer level (2.42 mg/L). Radiographs, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging, and CT angiography suggested a slow-flow venous malformation. The excisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Ultrasound-guided Sclerotherapy with the Sclerotherapy with Adjunctive Stasis of Efflux Technique was performed for other lesions. Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate (60 mg/2 mL; 0.5mL) was used in each lesion. Post-intervention, at 6 months follow-up, cosmetic appearance improved drastically, with the hands benefitted most. Parents were satisfied with overall outcome. Sclerotherapy was stopped after 4 cycles. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is effective in treating venous malformations. The ideal result is seen after 4-5 sittings. Sclerotherapy must be performed in the operating theatre under sedation or appropriate anesthesia with resuscitation equipment at the ready disposal. Excision is reserved for bigger superficial lesions.

3.
World Neurosurg ; 156: e319-e328, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555576

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Various techniques of performing lumbar discectomy are prevalent, each having its rationale and claimed benefits. The authors ventured to assess the perioperative factors, outcomes, and complications of each procedure and compare among them with 946 patients contributed by 10 centers and operated by experienced surgeons. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients operated using open discectomy, microdiscectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, and Destandau techniques with a follow-up of minimum 2 years. The inclusion criteria were age >18 years, failed conservative treatment for 4-6 weeks, and the involvement of a single lumbar level. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score of back, leg, and Oswestry Disability Index scores postoperatively across the board, with no significant difference between them. Minimally invasive procedures (microendoscopic discectomy, interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, and Destandau techniques) had shorter operation time, hospital stay, better cosmesis, and decreased blood loss compared with open procedures (open discectomy and microdiscectomy). The overall complication rate was 10.1%. The most common complication was recurrence (6.86%), followed by reoperation (4.3%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2.24%), wrong level surgery (0.74%), superficial infection (0.62%), and deep infection (0.37%). There were minor differences in incidence of complications between techniques. CONCLUSION: Although minimally invasive techniques have some advantages over the open techniques in the perioperative factors, all the techniques are effective and provide similar pain relief and functional outcomes at the end of 2 years. The various rates of individual complications provide a reference value for future studies.


Assuntos
Discotomia/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento Conservador , Avaliação da Deficiência , Endoscopia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Microcirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Indian J Orthop ; 55(2): 342-351, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33927812

RESUMO

AIM: Infection after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, though rare, is a potentially devastating complication and the evidence-based recommendation on the various topics in its management is limited. The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for the prevention and management of infections in ACL reconstruction surgery by performing a structured expert consensus survey using Delphi methodology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 topics of relevance in the prevention and management of infection following ACL reconstruction were chosen from an extensive literature review. 30 panelists were requested to respond to a three-round survey, with feedback, to develop a consensus statement on the topics. RESULTS: Consensus statements could be prepared in eleven out of twenty-two topics including: the graft is retained at the first arthroscopic debridement, the graft is removed when repeated debridement are needed, and revision ACL reconstruction is needed only if the patient develops instability. Concurrence could be obtained in the topics including: longer duration of antibiotics is needed in immunocompromised patients, soaking graft in antibiotic solution reduces infection risk, and knee swelling without warmth does not suggest infection. CONCLUSIONS: A proper skin preparation, a longer course of antibiotics in immunocompromised patients, and soaking the graft in antibiotics reduces the risk of infection. In case of infection, a healthy-looking graft must be retained at the first debridement and if the graft must be removed, revision ACL reconstruction is advised only if the patient develops instability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00363-z.

5.
Asian Spine J ; 13(5): 786-792, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31154700

RESUMO

Study Design: Prospective study. Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of the lumbar discectomy procedure using the Destandau Endospine System by assessing the functional outcome and complication rate in 614 patients. Overview of Literature: Endoscopic Spine Surgery (Endospine) using Destandau's technique is an established treatment method of lumbar disk herniation; it was introduced in 1993 and is gaining prominence for its small skin incision and minimal tissue dissection with excellent visualization. Methods: Of 840 patients, we selected 614 patients, based on the strict inclusion criteria, who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) between August 2008 and November 2015. The technique comprised localization of the symptomatic level followed by insertion of an endospine system device through a 15-20-mm skin and fascial incision to perform a discectomy. We evaluated results by Macnab's criteria, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score after a minimum follow-up of 12 months and maximum up to 54 months. Results: Based on the modified Macnab's criteria, 479 patients (78.01%) exhibited excellent, 110 (17.9%) good, 19 (3.09%) fair, and 6 (0.97%) poor results. The average ODI score was improved from 64 (range, 44-86; standard deviation [SD]=9.2) to 14 (range, 2-31; SD=4.4), and the average VAS score from 7.8 (range, 6-10; SD=0.9) to 2 (range, 0-7; SD=1.2) in a year. On 1-year follow-up, 589 patients (95.9%) were completely pain-free and satisfied with the procedure. Conclusions: ELD provides a safe, effective, and minimal access corridor for lumbar discectomy. The technique also allows early postoperative mobilization and faster return-to-work.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA