Surgical Outcomes in Octogenarians with Central Cord Syndrome: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is a traumatic cervical spine injury that is treated with surgical decompression. In octogenarians (80-89), surgeons often opt for conservative management instead due to fears of postoperative complications and prolonged recovery times. This study aims to assess the in-hospital complications and outcomes in octogenarians undergoing surgery compared to those undergoing nonsurgical management for CCS. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for octogenarians with CCS. Patients who received surgical fusion or decompression were divided into the surgery group and the remaining into the nonsurgical group. The surgery group was sampled and propensity score matched with the non-surgery group. Student t tests and Pearson χ2 tests were used to test for group differences. RESULTS: A total of 759 octogenarians with CCS were identified. Following sampling and propensity score matching, 225 patients were identified in each group. The surgery group experienced longer intensive care unit (6.8 days vs. 3.21 days, P < 0.001) and hospital (13.79 days vs. 7.8 days, P < 0.001) lengths of stay and higher rates of deep vein thrombosis (4.89% vs. 0.44%, P = 0.02) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (4% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). Patients did not otherwise differ in mortality rate, other hospital complications, and discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing surgery for CCS experience longer length of stay and complications consistent with prolonged hospitalization but otherwise have similar mortality, hospital complications, and discharge disposition compared to non-surgical treatment. Given the relative lack of short-term drawbacks, surgery should be considered first-line management when the long-term benefits are substantive.

Racial disparities in incidence, treatment, and survival in adult brain metastases: a 10-year national database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess demographic and racial disparities in incidence, treatment, and survival of adults with metastatic malignancy to the brain. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database, the authors identified adults with nonprimary brain metastases between 2010 and 2019. Incidence was calculated for all 10 years while data from 2010 to 2014 were used for survival analysis. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality within 5 years, assessed by 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates. Chi-square tests of independence and one-way ANOVA were used to compare categorical and continuous measures, respectively, between non-Hispanic White (NHW), Hispanic White (HW), Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) patients. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was developed to evaluate the risk of death within 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 64,690 patient records were identified and analyzed following exclusion based on age (patients > 84 years or < 18 years were excluded), missing race data, and missing survival data. Incidences are reported per 100,000 adults. The incidence of brain metastases increased from 2.59 in 2010 to 2.78 in 2019, with an average 10-year incidence of 2.72. API patients had the highest population-adjusted incidence (3.52), followed by NHW (2.99), Black (2.32), and HW (1.59) patients. Black patients were the most likely to have low income and single status, while API patients were the most likely to have high income and married status. Subsequently, Black patients had the shortest survival time (9.05 months vs 9.19 months for NHW vs 12.93 months for HW vs 15.89 months for API patients, p < 0.001). After controlling for the effect of socioeconomic factors on survival, the multivariable analysis showed that Black (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94), HW (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.76), and API (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.73) patients all had a survival advantage compared with NHW patients. Surgery also conferred a strong survival advantage (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44-0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of brain metastases has increased slightly between 2010 and 2019, with the highest rate in API patients. Black patients had the lowest survival, potentially due to poor socioeconomic status and lower rates of surgery and chemotherapy. Black patients were the most likely to not be recommended surgery, suggesting a discrepancy in services offered to these patients. More research is warranted to understand the underlying causes of these disparities.

Outcomes Following 2-Level Cervical Interventions with Cage-and-Plate, Zero-Profile, or Arthroplasty Constructs.

BACKGROUND: Though cage-and-plate constructs are widely used for disk height restoration in surgery for cervical disc disease, concerns over range of motion limitations and adjacent disc space violations have fueled the development of artificial disc and zero-profile constructs. This study investigated the outcomes of patients undergoing two-level cervical interventions via arthroplasty, cage-and-plate, or zero-profile constructs. METHODS: Patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical procedures between 2010 and 2020 were identified using an all-payer claims database. Logistic regression models were utilized to develop criteria for a 1:1:1-exact match procedure. The primary outcome was the need for additional surgery within 30 months, and the secondary outcomes included medical and surgical complications observed within 30 days of index intervention. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 133,831 patients were identified as undergoing two-level anterior cervical interventions. Seven thousand three hundred seventy-one records were analyzed through a 1:1:1 match. Patients who received zero-profile versus cage-and-plate constructs had significantly decreased odds of requiring additional surgery within 30 months (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.51-0.81). However, postoperative medical complications were increased among patients who received zero-profile constructs compared to cage-and-plate (OR 1.59; 95%CI 1.07-2.37). Patients who underwent arthroplasty also had decreased odds for additional surgery versus cage-and-plate (OR 0.75; 95%CI 0.60-0.93). There was no significant difference between arthroplasty and cage-and-plate constructs in developing postoperative surgical or medical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing two-level interventions, cage-and-plate constructs were associated with increased odds of additional surgery within 30 months following index procedures when compared to zero-profile constructs or arthroplasty.

Racial Disparities in Time to Decompression in Central Cord Syndrome: A National Trauma Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cord syndrome (CCS) is the most common type of incomplete spinal cord injury. Prompt surgical decompression within 24 hours increases neurologic function and rates of home discharge. Racial disparities exist in spinal cord injury, with Black patients experiencing longer lengths of stay and higher rates of complications than in White patients. This study aims to investigate potential racial disparities in time to surgical decompression in patients with CCS. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2017 to 2019 for patients who underwent surgery for CCS. The primary outcome was time from hospital admission to surgery. Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test were used to evaluate differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. An uncensored Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed to assess the effect of race on surgical timing while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: 1,076 patients with CCS resulting in cervical spinal cord surgery were included in the analysis. Regression analysis results showed that Black patients (HR=0.85, P = 0.03), female patients (HR=0.81, P < 0.01), and patients treated at community hospitals (HR=0.82, P = 0.01) were less likely to receive early surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Though the advantages of early surgical decompression in the setting of CCS have been detailed in medical literature, Black, and female patients experience lower rates of prompt surgery following hospital admission and higher rates of adverse outcomes. This disproportionately increased time to intervention exemplifies demographic disparities in the timely provision of treatment to patients with spinal cord injuries.

Gastrostomy Sequence With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting-Does It Matter?

BACKGROUND: Neurological injury requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement often necessitates gastrostomy for nutritional support. The sequence of these procedures is debated over concerns for shunt infection and displacement requiring revisional surgery as a consequence of gastrostomy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal sequence of VPS shunt and gastrostomy tube placement in adults. METHODS: In an all-payer database, adult patients undergoing gastrostomy and VPS placement were identified within 15 days between January 2010 and October 2021. Patients were categorized as receiving gastrostomy before, on the same day as, or after shunt placement. The primary outcomes of this study were rates of revision and infection. All outcomes were evaluated within 30 months after index shunting. RESULTS: In total, 3015 patients were identified as undergoing VPS and gastrostomy procedures within 15 days. After a 1:1:1 match, 1080 patient records were analyzed. Revision rates at 30 months were significantly lower among patients who received VPS and gastrostomy procedures on the same day compared with gastrostomy after VPS (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). In addition, patients who received gastrostomy before VPS compared with those after had lower revision rates (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96) and infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99). No significant differences were noted in mechanical complication or shunt displacement rates. CONCLUSION: Patients requiring VPS and gastrostomy may benefit from undergoing both procedures concurrently or with gastrostomy before VPS placement, secondary to lower revision rates. Patients undergoing gastrostomy before VPS have the added benefit of decreased infection rates.

Outcomes of patients undergoing single-level arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Compared to vertebral body fusion, artificial discs are thought to lessen the risks of adjacent segment disease and the need for additional surgery by maintaining spinal mobility as they mimic the intervertebral disc structure. No studies have compared the rates of postoperative complications and the requirement for secondary surgery at adjacent segments among patients who have undergone anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF) versus those undergoing lumbar arthroplasty. METHODS: An all-payer claims database identified 11,367 individuals who underwent single-level ALIF and lumbar arthroplasty for degenerative disc disease (DDD) between January 2010 and October 2020. Rates of complications following surgery, the need for additional lumbar surgeries, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative opioid utilization were assessed in matched cohorts based on logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meyer plots were created to model the probability of additional surgery. RESULTS: Following 1:1 exact matching, 846 records of patients who had undergone ALIF or lumbar arthroplasty were analyzed. All-cause readmission within 30-30 days following surgery was significantly higher in patients undergoing ALIF versus arthroplasty (2.6% vs. 0.71%, p = 0.02). LOS was significantly lower among the patients who had undergone ALIF (1.043 ± 0.21 vs. 2.17 ± 1.7, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ALIF and lumbar arthroplasty procedures are equally safe and effective in treating DDD. Our findings do not support that single-level fusions may biomechanically necessitate revisional surgeries.

Outcomes Following Endoscopic versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release-A Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy in the world. Surgical treatment can be performed in an open or endoscopic fashion. To date, similar rates of complications for both approaches have been described. We sought to compare the results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) in patients with CTS. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of CTS undergoing open or endoscopic surgical management were identified between January 2010 and October 2020. The primary outcome of the study was nerve injury within 30 days of the procedure. Secondary outcomes included readmission, wound-related complications, hematoma, seroma formation, and cost. RESULTS: A total of 735,631 patients were identified as undergoing CTR. Following a 1:1 match procedure, 292,626 patient records were analyzed. Patients undergoing OCTR versus ECTR had an increased odds of readmission at 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-2.06), developing an infection (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.41-1.80), and experiencing wound complications (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.74-2.23). No significant difference in odds of developing a seroma (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.83-1.65), hematoma (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.95-1.39), or nerve injury (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.98-1.43) was noted. The reimbursement cost of ECTR was significantly greater than OCTR ($310.60 ± $1639.57 vs. $237.69 ± $1488.93, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date on the surgical management of CTR, OCTR was seen to be associated with an increased odds of readmission, infection, and wound complications, but reduced costs for the procedure alone.

Reduced insulin sensitivity in young, normoglycaemic subjects alters microvascular tissue oxygenation during postocclusive reactive hyperaemia.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of the study? Are measures of reduced insulin sensitivity in young, normoglycaemic subjects correlated with near-infrared spectroscopy-derived microvascular responsiveness [tissue oxygen saturation reperfusion rate (STO2 upslope)] during postocclusive reactive hyperaemia? What is the main finding and its importance? A sevenfold range of hepatic insulin sensitivity is significantly correlated (r = 0.44, P = 0.02) with STO2 upslope after transient tissue ischaemia. Near-infrared spectroscopy may be an important tool for determining altered microvascular function before onset of hyperglycaemia. Identification of pre-type 2 diabetes much earlier than with the present clinical criteria is important for pre-emptive measures against microvascular deterioration. ABSTRACT: Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurement of postocclusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH) tissue oxygen saturation reperfusion rate [STO2 upslope (as a percentage per minute)] has recently been correlated with the percentage of flow-mediated dilatation (%FMD). Cardiovascular disease is associated with impairments in %FMD. Reduced insulin sensitivity may negatively affect the vascular system for many years before prediabetes/type 2 diabetes states. The aim of this study was to determine whether static and dynamic STO2 parameters during PORH are correlated with reduced insulin sensitivity in young, normoglycaemic subjects. Glucose and insulin were measured during an oral glucose tolerance test in 18- to 26-year-old, healthy subjects (11 men and 11 women), and STO2 was measured during PORH of antebrachial muscle. Hepatic (ISIHOMA ) and whole-body (ISICOMP ) insulin sensitivities were calculated. The STO2 upslope was negatively correlated with minimal STO2 (r = -0.5, P = 0.01). The change of STO2 from minimum to baseline (ΔSTO2 ) was significantly negatively correlated with fasting insulin (r = -0.5, P = 0.01) and a positively correlated with ISIHOMA (r = 0.65, P = 0.001). The minimum STO2 was significantly negatively correlated with ISIHOMA , and STO2 upslope was significantly positively correlated with ISIHOMA (r = 0.44, P = 0.02). The minimum STO2 (a measure of O2 extraction while the cuff was inflated), ΔSTO2 (a measure of the amount of reperfusion) and STO2 upslope (a measure of responsiveness of the microcirculation to ischaemia) were all positively correlated with ISIHOMA , one of the longest-used measures of insulin sensitivity. The NIRS-derived STO2 might be a useful tool for assessing how levels of reduced insulin sensitivity in young, normoglycaemic adults affect the microvasculature.