RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Orphenadrine overdoses can cause antimuscarinic toxicity, respiratory failure, refractory seizures and cardiotoxicity. The dose-toxicity relationship is poorly defined. Orphenadrine is marketed as immediate and sustained release formulations, and it is not known how the formulation impacts on toxicity. We determined the clinical toxicity of orphenadrine in patients referred to a regional poisons centre. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients in New South Wales with orphenadrine deliberate self-poisoning from January 2016 to April 2022 referred to the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre. Demographics, history of exposure, treatment and outcomes were extracted from clinical databases. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine thresholds predicting toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified, with information on clinical outcomes in 46 patients and doses in 41 patients. All patients were older than 12 years. The median orphenadrine dose was 770 mg (range 210-10,000 mg), 59 per cent as the immediate release formulation, and 67 per cent reported coingestants. Doses of sustained release formulations were significantly greater than immediate release formulations, median 2,750 mg versus 595 mg. Common clinical features were drowsiness (59 per cent), sinus tachycardia (37 per cent) and confusion (33 per cent). Three patients had mild hypotension, three were intubated for coma, and two had seizures; no patients suffered ventricular dysrhythmias. All patients survived, with 75 per cent being medically cleared within 24 hours of presentation. A dose-toxicity relationship was observed, but conclusions are limited by the small number of cases with moderate or severe toxicity. DISCUSSION: All patients survived, and severe cardiac and neurological toxicity were not observed. This contrasts to published case reports noting severe poisoning at similar or lower doses. Formulation may have an impact on outcomes, with lesser toxicity from sustained release products. CONCLUSIONS: Orphenadrine doses up to 10 g were associated with antimuscarinic toxicity and sedation, but not severe cardiotoxicity. More research exploring the effect of dose and formulation on outcomes is required.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Orfenadrina , Centros de Controle de Intoxicações , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Centros de Controle de Intoxicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Orfenadrina/intoxicação , Tentativa de Suicídio , Criança , New South Wales , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/intoxicação , Idoso , Relação Dose-Resposta a DrogaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Barium poisoning is rare but potentially severe. We describe a case of acute barium carbonate poisoning with cardiac arrest, managed with intravenous potassium, dialysis and endoscopic removal of retained ceramic glazes. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old woman presented with vomiting 90 min after ingesting 3 cups of barium and strontium carbonate. Initial bloods noted potassium 2.8 mmol/L and creatinine 53 µmol/L. Electrocardiogram demonstrated prolonged corrected QT interval 585msec. Initial management included intravenous potassium. Four hours post-ingestion she developed proximal muscle weakness in upper limbs with a potassium of 2.2 mmol/L. At 15 h post-ingestion she developed profound muscle weakness, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest. Treatment included defibrillation, endotracheal intubation and continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (CVVHD) for metabolic derangement and enhanced elimination of barium. Chest X-ray 17 h post-ingestion demonstrated a large radio-opaque mass in the stomach, thought to be the ceramic glaze. Endoscopy removed the retained material 41 h post-ingestion. She was extubated 58 h post-ingestion and CVVHD was ceased on day 3. Serum creatinine peaked at 348 µmol/L on day 7, but normalised by discharge. Biphasic barium concentrations were noted, notably 94 µmol/L on admission, 195 µmol/L at 16 h, 95 µmol/L at 20 h, and 193 µmol/L at 30 h post-ingestion. CONCLUSION: In barium poisoning with hypokalaemia, prompt potassium supplementation is required but rebound hyperkalaemia can occur. Endoscopic removal of ceramic glazes may be useful more than 12 h post-ingestion. Consider extracorporeal methods to enhance barium elimination in severe cases.