Changes in Sleep Pattern During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Patients With Narcolepsy, Idiopathic Hypersomnia, and Restless Legs Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown effect on sleep symptoms in patients with narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), and restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: Between March and May 2020, a sample of adult patients regularly followed up in a Reference Hospital Sleep Unit (299 with narcolepsy, 260 with IH, and 254 with RLS) was offered an online survey assessing their sleep-wake habits, daily activities, medication intake, and validated scales: International RLS Study Group questionnaire, Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), IH Severity Scale (IHSS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Insomnia Severity Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and European Quality of Life (QoL) scale. The survey was proposed once, and the questions were answered for the prelockdown (recall of the month before the confinement) and the lockdown (time of study) periods. RESULTS: Overall, 331 patients completed the survey (response rate 40.7%): 102 with narcolepsy, 81 with IH, and 148 with RLS. All patients reported later bedtimes, with reduced differences for time in bed (TIB) and total sleep time (TST) over 24 hours between weekdays and weekends. Patients with narcolepsy spent more TIB and increased TST overnight, with more daytime napping. They had more awakenings, higher ESS scores, lower QoL, and no NSS changes. Patients with IH also increased their TIB, TST overnight and 24 hours on weekdays. Nocturnal sleep latency and the number of awakenings increased but with no change in ESS, QoL, and IHSS scores. Patients with RLS reported longer nocturnal sleep latency, more awakenings, more naps, decreased TIB, and TST overnight. RLS severity increased while QoL decreased. A significant portion of patients reported disease worsening during the lockdown (narcolepsy: 39.4%, IH: 43.6%, and RLS: 32.8%), and some patients stopped or lowered their medication (narcolepsy: 22.5%, IH: 28%, and RLS: 9.5%). DISCUSSION: During the lockdown, all patients reported later bedtimes; those with narcolepsy and IH extended their sleep duration unlike patients with RLS. These changes were often associated with negative consequences on QoL. In the current context of recurrent COVID-19 waves, the recent development of teleconsultations should enable physicians to monitor patients with chronic sleep disorders more closely and to recommend optimized sleep schedules and duration, in order to prevent psychological problems and improve their QoL.

Linking clinical complaints and objective measures of disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Despite its high frequency in narcolepsy type 1(NT1), disrupted nocturnal sleep (DNS) remains understudied, and its determinants have been poorly assessed. We aimed to determine the clinical, polysomnographic (PSG), and biological variables associated with DNS in a large sample of patients with NT1, and to evaluate the effect of medication on DNS and its severity. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-eight consecutive adult patients with NT1 (145 untreated, 103 treated) were included at the National Reference Center for Narcolepsy-France; 51 drug-free patients were reevaluated during treatment. DNS, assessed with the Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), was categorized in four levels (absent, mild, moderate, severe). Clinical characteristics, validated questionnaires, PSG parameters (sleep fragmentation markers: sleep (SB) and wake bouts (WB), transitions), objective sleepiness, and orexin-A levels were assessed. RESULTS: In drug-free patients, DNS severity was associated with higher scores on NSS, higher sleepiness, anxiety/depressive symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, worse quality of life (QoL). Patients with moderate/severe DNS (59%) had increased sleep onset REM periods, lower sleep efficiency, longer wake after sleep onset, more N1, SB, WB, sleep instability, transitions. In treated patients, DNS was associated with the same clinical data, and antidepressant use; but only with longer REM sleep latency on PSG. During treatment, sleepiness, NSS scores, depressive symptoms decreased, as well as total sleep time, WB, SB, transitions. DNS improved in 55% of patients, without predictors except more baseline anxiety. CONCLUSION: DNS complaint is frequent in NT1, associated with disease severity based on NSS, several PSG parameters, and objective sleepiness in untreated and treated conditions. DNS improves with treatment. We advocate the systematic assessment of this symptom and its inclusion in NT1 management strategy.