Human Intestinal Macrophages Are Involved in the Pathology of Both Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn Disease.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal macrophages are key immune cells in the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis and have a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the mechanisms by which macrophages exert a pathological influence in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) are not yet well understood. METHODS: We purified intestinal macrophages from gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies (patients with UC, patients with CD, and healthy donors) and analyzed their transcriptome by RNA sequencing and bioinformatics, confirming results with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Compared with those of healthy donors, intestinal macrophages in patients with UC and with CD showed cellular reprograming of 1287 and 840 dysregulated genes, respectively (false discovery rate ≤ 0.1). The UC and CD intestinal macrophages showed an activated M1 inflammatory phenotype and the downregulation of genes engaged in drug/xenobiotic metabolism. Only macrophages from CD showed, concomitant to an M1 phenotype, a significant enrichment in the expression of M2 and fibrotic and granuloma-related genes. For the first time, we showed (and validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry) that intestinal macrophages in patients with IBD present both M1 and M2 features, as recently described for tumor-associated macrophages, that affect key pathways for IBD pathology, represented by key markers such as MMP12 (fibrosis), CXCL9 (T-cell attraction), and CD40 (T-cell activation). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the therapeutic targeting of macrophages to maintain remission in IBD but also indicate that a shift toward an M2 program-as proposed by some reports-may not limit the recruitment and activation of T cells because M2 features do not preclude M1 activation in patients with UC or CD and could exacerbate M2-related CD-specific features such as fibrosis and the formation of granulomas.

High incidence of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycaemia in inflammatory bowel disease: metabolic and clinical predictors identified by machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroids (GC) are long-established, widely used agents for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hyperglycaemia is a known complication of GC treatment with implications for morbidity and mortality. Published data on prevalence and risk factors for GC-induced hyperglycaemia in the IBD population are limited. We prospectively characterise this complication in our cohort, employing machine-learning methods to identify key predictors of risk. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of IBD patients receiving intravenous hydrocortisone (IVH). Electronically triggered three times daily capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring was recorded alongside diabetes mellitus (DM) history, IBD biomarkers, nutritional and IBD clinical activity scores. Hyperglycaemia was defined as CBG ≥11.1 mmol/L and undiagnosed DM as glycated haemoglobin ≥48 mmol/mol. Random forest (RF) regression models were used to extract predictor-patterns present within the dataset. RESULTS: 94 consecutive IBD patients treated with IVH were included. 60% (56/94) of the cohort recorded an episode of hyperglycaemia, including 57% (50/88) of those with no history of DM, of which 19% (17/88) and 5% (4/88) recorded a CBG ≥14 mmol/L and ≥20 mmol/L, respectively. The RF models identified increased C-reactive protein (CRP) followed by a longer IBD duration as leading risk predictors for significant hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycaemia is common in IBD patients treated with intravenous GC. Therefore, CBG monitoring should be included in routine clinical practice. Machine learning methods can identify key risk factors for clinical complications. Steroid-sparing treatment strategies may be considered for those IBD patients with higher admission CRP and greater disease duration, who appear to be at the greatest risk of hyperglycaemia.

Low dose thiopurine and allopurinol co-therapy results in significant cost savings at a district general hospital.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are widely used for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (CD). Published data report >50% of patients stop thiopurines due to therapeutic failure, hepatitis or side effects. In this situation, many UK clinicians start biologics in CD patients. This has significant cost implications. An alternative strategy is low dose thiopurine and allopurinol (LDTA) co-therapy. We report the annual cost savings from adopting this strategy at our centre. METHODS: Patients with CD treated with LDTA in preference to biological therapy were identified using a prospective local inflammatory bowel disease database. The annual drug cost of treatment with LDTA compared with biologic therapy was calculated. Cost of attending the day unit for an infusion was not included. RESULTS: 26 patients with CD who failed standard dose thiopurine and were treated with LDTA were identified over a 12-month period and followed up for 1 year. 12 patients failed LDTA and progressed to biological therapy. The remaining 14 patients entered sustained clinical remission on LDTA. The cost savings achieved using the LDTA strategy in this group of patients was £146 413 per year with an average saving of £10 458 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified a significant annual cost savings with this treatment strategy through the prevention of escalation to biologics. These cost savings are likely to be even more significant in the long term since a significant proportion of patients treated with biological therapy require dose escalation. We believe adopting this strategy more widely could lead to significant healthcare savings.

Fragility fracture risk in cirrhosis: a comparison of the fracture risk assessment tool, British Society of Gastroenterology and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is common in chronic liver disease and predisposes to fracture. We aimed to compare British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) osteoporosis guidelines with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). FRAX is a web-based algorithm used to estimate fracture risk with or without dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Pre-BMD FRAX categorises patients to low, intermediate or high risk according to thresholds set by the National Osteoporosis Guidelines Group (NOGG) and recommends lifestyle advice, DXA or anti-osteoporosis treatment, respectively. DESIGN: The guidelines were applied to 132 patients with cirrhosis (91% Child-Pugh A). The number that would require DXA and be recommended treatment was determined. Using post-BMD FRAX/NOGG as a reference point, high-risk patients not recommended treatment and low-risk patients treated 'unnecessarily' were identified. RESULTS: BSG guidelines were applicable to 100% of the cohort, 88% required DXA and 30% would be recommended treatment. Equivalent figures for NICE guidelines were 30%, 17% and 12%, and for FRAX/NOGG guidelines were 78%, 27% and 15%, respectively. Using BSG guidance 8% of high-risk patients were not recommended treatment and 62% of those treated were low risk, compared with NICE: 3%, 60% and FRAX/NOGG: 13%, 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis BSG guidelines are the most inclusive, but have high cost implications in terms of DXA scanning and unnecessary treatment. Risk stratification using FRAX requires fewer DXA scans with minimal impact in terms of missing high-risk patients, and yields a modest reduction in unnecessary treatment.