Antiplatelet therapy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated meta-analysis.

Antiplatelet therapy (AT) may serve to reduce the effects of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH)-induced pro-coagulant state in the cerebral circulation. Several studies, however, have delivered conflicting conclusions on the efficacy of AT post aSAH. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central were undertaken on 27th March 2023. The primary outcome was delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic and angiographic vasospasm, good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] with scores 0-2), hemorrhagic events, and in-hospital mortality. Twenty-two studies reporting 4378 patients with aSAH were included in the meta-analysis. AT was associated with lower rates of DCI (RR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.43; 0.89), symptomatic vasospasm (RR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.46; 0.86), and moderate/severe angiographic vasospasm (RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.65; 0.84), with no effect on hemorrhagic complications (RR=1.36, 95% CI: 0.77; 2.41). When analyzing only post-ictal use of AT, AT additionally favored rates of good functional outcomes (RR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.10; 1.26) and in-hospital mortality (RR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.39; 0.80). In the subgroup treated with cilostazol, AT was associated with lower rates of DCI (RR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.32), symptomatic vasospasm (RR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.33; 0.65), moderate/severe angiographic vasospasm (RR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.57; 0.98) and good functional outcome (RR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.08; 1.43). In the surgically treated aSAH subgroup, AT favored rates of symptomatic vasospasm (RR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.30; 0.98), moderate/severe angiographic vasospasm (RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.54; 0.90) and good functional outcome (RR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.09; 1.41). In the endovascularly treated aSAH subgroup, AT was associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.41; 0.88). In aSAH patients, post-ictal AT is associated with benefits in terms of rates of DCI, vasospasm, good functional outcomes, and in-hospital mortality without an increased risk of hemorrhagic events.

Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology: Progress, Challenges, and Future Prospects.

Advances in robotic technology have improved standard techniques in numerous surgical and endovascular specialties, offering more precision, control, and better patient outcomes. Robotic-assisted interventional neuroradiology is an emerging field at the intersection of interventional neuroradiology and biomedical robotics. Endovascular robotics can automate maneuvers to reduce procedure times and increase its safety, reduce occupational hazards associated with ionizing radiations, and expand networks of care to reduce gaps in geographic access to neurointerventions. To date, many robotic neurointerventional procedures have been successfully performed, including cerebral angiography, intracranial aneurysm embolization, carotid stenting, and epistaxis embolization. This review aims to provide a survey of the state of the art in robotic-assisted interventional neuroradiology, consider their technical and adoption limitations, and explore future developments critical for the widespread adoption of robotic-assisted neurointerventions.