Intralesional administration of L19-IL2/L19-TNF in stage III or stage IVM1a melanoma patients: results of a phase II study.

The intratumoral injection of cytokines, in particular IL2, has shown promise for cutaneous melanoma patients with unresectable disease or continuous recurrence despite surgery. We recently reported that the intralesional injection of L19-IL2, an immunocytokine combining IL2 and the human monoclonal antibody fragment L19, resulted in efficient regional control of disease progression, increased time to distant metastasis and evidence of effect on circulating immune cell populations. We have also shown in preclinical models of cancer a remarkable synergistic effect of the combination of L19-IL2 with L19-TNF, a second clinical-stage immunocytokine, based on the same L19 antibody fused to TNF. Here, we describe the results of a phase II clinical trial based on the intralesional administration of L19-IL2 and L19-TNF in patients with stage IIIC and IVM1a metastatic melanoma, who were not candidate to surgery. In 20 efficacy-evaluable patients, 32 melanoma lesions exhibited complete responses upon intralesional administration of the two products, with mild side effects mainly limited to injection site reactions. Importantly, we observed complete responses in 7/13 (53.8 %) non-injected lesions (4 cutaneous, 3 lymph nodes), indicating a systemic activity of the intralesional immunostimulatory treatment. The intralesional administration of L19-IL2 and L19-TNF represents a simple and effective method for the local control of inoperable melanoma lesions, with a potential to eradicate them or make them suitable for a facile surgical removal of the residual mass.

The use of polytetrafluoroethylene to facilitate the vascular access in recurrent melanoma to limbs.

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma with recurrent loco-regional metastases to limbs often makes difficult a second surgical approach because of the adhesions affecting the vascular access. Our aim was to evaluate whether the placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane around vessels might facilitate a surgical re-approach. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We reported a case of a 64-year-old male with a melanoma on the left foot who developed in transit metastases after LND. While performing the inguinopelvic LND we coated the iliac vessels with PTFE patch to facilitate the vascular access in case of re-intervention for a ILP. In the second surgical approach we made a cutaneous incision in the left iliac region and we proceeded through the subcutaneous tissue until detection of iliac vessels, more clearly visible because of the PTFE patch fixed around vascular walls to minimize adhesions. We removed the PTFE coating and easily performed arteriotomy and venotomy for the completion of the ILP. DISCUSSION: This case report seems to demonstrate the efficacy of a PTFE membrane applied in a patient around iliac vessels during inguinopelvic dissection, to reduce adhesion density. In fact this membrane provided a barrier to adhesions of the iliac vessels, decreasing the risk of vascular injury thereby facilitating a subsequent vascular access. Re-coating of the iliac vessels with PTFE could be preparatory to a better identification of the vascular structures in cases of a surgical re-approach. CONCLUSION: The use of PTFE effectively simplifies the second approach to vessels in event of a melanoma metastasizing to limbs.

Isolated limb perfusion with the tumor-targeting human monoclonal antibody-cytokine fusion protein L19-TNF plus melphalan and mild hyperthermia in patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma.

BACKGROUND: L19-TNF is a tumor-targeting immunocytokine composed of the human L19 antibody binding to extra domain B (ED-B) of fibronectin of newly formed blood vessels, and of human TNF. This exploratory trial evaluates safety and clinical activity of L19-TNF plus melphalan-containing isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in extremity melanoma patients. METHODS: Seven and 10 patients received 325 µg and 650 µg of L19-TNF, respectively, during the ILP. Patients were studied for safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of this experimental L19-TNF ILP procedure. RESULTS: Non-hematologic toxicity of L19-TNF ILP was very low, but severe myelosuppression was seen in four patients. Although L19-TNF was administered at a TNF-equivalent dose of only 3.13 and 6.25% of the approved TNF (Beromun®) dose of 4 mg, L19-TNF ILP induced objective responses in 86 and 89% of patients, respectively, including a complete response (CR) in 5/10 patients treated with L19-TNF ILP at 650 µg that was durable at 12 months in four patients. No CR was seen at 325 µg of L19-TNF. CONCLUSIONS: ILP with L19-TNF had a favorable safety and a promising activity profile at a dose of 650 µg of L19-TNF, supporting the exploration of higher L19-TNF doses and a Phase II trial comparing L19-TNF ILP with standard melphalan-containing ILP.

Limited induction of tumor cross-reactive T cells without a measurable clinical benefit in early melanoma patients vaccinated with human leukocyte antigen class I-modified peptides.

PURPOSE: The progressive immune dysfunctions that occur in patients with advanced melanoma make them unlikely to efficiently respond to cancer vaccines. A multicenter randomized phase II trial was conducted to test whether immunization with modified HLA class I tumor peptides in the context of adjuvant therapy results in better immunologic responses and improved clinical outcomes in patients with early melanoma (stages IIB/C-III). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-three patients were enrolled to undergo vaccination (n = 22) or observation (n = 21). The vaccine included four HLA-A*0201-restricted modified peptides (Melan-A/MART-1([27L]), gp100([210M]), NY-ESO-1([165V]), and Survivin([97M])) emulsified in Montanide ISA51 and injected subcutaneously in combination with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2)) and low-dose IL-2 (3 × 10(6) IU). The immune responses were monitored using ex vivo IFN-γ-ELISpot, HLA/multimer staining, and in vitro short-term peptide sensitization assays. RESULTS: Vaccination induced a rapid and persistent increase in specific effector memory CD8(+) T cells in 75% of the patients. However, this immunization was not associated with any significant increase in disease-free or overall survival as compared with the observation group. An extensive immunologic analysis revealed a significantly reduced cross-recognition of the corresponding native peptides and, most importantly, a limited ability to react to melanoma cells. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant setting is an appealing approach for testing cancer vaccines because specific CD8(+) T cells can be efficiently induced in most vaccinated patients. However, the marginal antitumor activity of the T cells induced by modified peptides in this study largely accounts for the observed lack of benefit of vaccination. These findings suggest reconsidering this immunization strategy, particularly in early disease.

A phase II trial of vaccination with autologous, tumor-derived heat-shock protein peptide complexes Gp96, in combination with GM-CSF and interferon-alpha in metastatic melanoma patients.

The aim of this study was to determine the immunogenicity and antitumor activity of autologous, tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96-peptide complex vaccine (HSPPC-96; Oncophage given with GM-CSF and IFN-alpha in pre-treated metastatic (AJCC stage IV) melanoma patients. Patients underwent surgical resection of metastatic lesions for HSPPC-96 production. HSPPC-96 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) in four weekly intervals (first cycle). Patients with more available vaccine and absence of progressive disease received four additional injections in 2-week intervals (second cycle) or more. GM-CSF was given s.c. at the same site at days -1, 0 and +1, while IFN-alpha (3 MU) was administered s.c. at a different site at days +4 and +6. Antigen-specific anti-melanoma T and NK lymphocyte response was assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained before and after vaccination. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, 20 received at least four injections (one cycle) of HSPPC-96 and were considered assessable. Toxicity was mild and most treatment-related adverse events were local erythema and induration at the injection site. Patients receiving at least four injections of HSPPC-96 were considered evaluable for clinical response: of the 18 patients with measurable disease post surgery, 11 showed stable disease (SD). The ELISPOT assay revealed an increased class I HLA-restricted T and NK cell-mediated post-vaccination response in 5 out of 17 and 12 out of the 18 patients tested, respectively. Four of the five class I HLA-restricted T cell responses fall in the group of SD patients. Vaccination with autologous HSPPC-96 together with GM-CSF and IFN-alpha is feasible and accompanied by mild local and systemic toxicity. Both tumor-specific T cell-mediated and NK cell responses were generated in a proportion of patients. Clinical activity was limited to SD. However, both immunological and clinical responses were not improved as compared with those recorded in a previous study investigating HSPPC-96 monotherapy.