Reliability of maximal respiratory nasal pressure tests in healthy young adults.

INTRODUCTION: Sniff nasal inspiratory (SNIP) and expiratory pressure (SNEP) may complement the assessment of respiratory muscle strength. Thus, specifying their reliability is relevant to improving the clinical consistency of both tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of SNIP and SNEP in healthy young adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included self-reported healthy aged 18 to 29 years. SNIP was performed using a plug to occlude one nostril, while SNEP was conducted using a facemask. Participants performed 20 SNIP and SNEP maneuvers with 30-second intervals in between. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC) assessed the reliability of SNIP and SNEP. Analyses were conducted between the highest peak pressure and the first reproducible maneuver in men and women. RESULTS: The total sample comprised 32 participants: 16 men and 16 women. The ICC, SEM, and MDC for SNIP maneuvers were 0.994 (95%CI 0.988 to 0.997), 1.820 cmH2O, and 5.043 cmH2O, respectively. For SNEP, these parameters were 0.950 (95%CI 0.897 to 0.976), 6.03 cmH2O, and 16.716 cmH2O. The SNIP and SNEP in men showed ICC of 0.992 (95%CI 0.977 to 0.997) and 0.877 (95%CI 0.648 to 0.957), SEM of 2.07 and 7.66 cmH2O, and MDC of 5.74 and 21.23 cmH2O. In women, SNIP and SNEP presented ICC of 0.992 (95%CI 0.977 to 0.997) and 0.957 (95%CI 0.878 to 0.985), SEM of 1.15 and 6.11 cmH2O, and MDC of 3.19 and 16.95 cmH2O. Also, 60% of the highest SNIPs occurred among the 11th and 20th maneuvers in men and women. In men, 55% of the highest SNEPs occurred among the 11th and 20th maneuvers; this value was 50% in women. CONCLUSION: SNIP and SNEP showed excellent reliability. The reliability of SNIP and SNEP in men was good and excellent, respectively, whereas both tests had excellent reliability in women. Also, women reached the highest peak pressure faster than men in both tests.

Impaired heart rate variability, Valsalva and 30:15 ratio indexes are associated with reduced submaximal exercise capacity in subjects with diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To assess cardiac autonomic control and its association with submaximal exercise measured using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in subjects with type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). METHODS: Cardiac autonomic control was assessed using Ewing's tests and heart rate variability (HRV) in DM2 volunteers (DG, n = 22) and sex-, age- and body mass index-matched non-diabetic controls (CG, n = 22) before, during and after 6MWT. RESULTS: Before the 6MWT, DG presented lower HRV represented by reduced SDNN [median 28.9 ms2 (IQR:18.6-35.4) vs. 45.1 (IQR:39.2-62.67), p < 0.001] and Total Power [median 785 ms2 (IQR:256-1264) vs. 1757 ms2 (IQR:1006-2912), p = 0.004]. Exercise capacity was reduced in DG [maximal predicted distance (%) = 88.4 ±â€¯6.4 vs. 95.2 ±â€¯11.0%, p = 0.018]. DG demonstrated lower global HRV during recovery and lower parasympathetic drive, represented by reduced RMSSD, during all phases of the 6MWT. Moreover, supine HR (r = -0.32), HR orthostatism (ρ = -0.40), SDNN pre-6MWT (ρ = 0.39), TP pre-6MWT (ρ = 0.38), Valsalva ratio (ρ = 0.39) and 30:15 ratio (ρ = 0.38) were all correlated with maximal walked distance. CONCLUSIONS: DM2 subjects presented abnormal HRV during and after submaximal exercise. Furthermore, autonomic control impairment in orthostatism, represented by lower global HRV (SDNN, Total power) and lower Ewing's indexes (Valsalva and 30:15 ratios), was associated with lower exercise capacity.