RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to validate and, if performance was unsatisfactory, update the previously published prognostic model to predict clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, using data following vaccine availability. METHODS: Using electronic health records of patients ≥18 years, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, from a large care-delivery network in Massachusetts, USA, from March 2020 to November 2021, we tested the performance of the previously developed prediction model and updated the prediction model by incorporating data after availability of COVID-19 vaccines. We randomly divided data into development (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. We built a model predicting worsening in a published severity scale in 24 h by LASSO regression and evaluated performance by c-statistic and Brier score. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 8185 patients (Development: 5730 patients [mean age: 62; 44% female] and Validation: 2455 patients [mean age: 62; 45% female]). The previously published model had suboptimal performance using data after November 2020 (N = 4973, c-statistic = 0.60. Brier score = 0.11). After retraining with the new data, the updated model included 38 predictors including 18 changing biomarkers. Patients hospitalized after Jun 1st, 2021 (when COVID-19 vaccines became widely available in Massachusetts) were younger and had fewer comorbidities than those hospitalized before. The c-statistic and Brier score were 0.77 and 0.13 in the development cohort, and 0.73 and 0.14 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 differed substantially over time. We developed a new dynamic model for rapid progression with satisfactory performance in the validation set.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Idoso , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Deterioração Clínica , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Modelos Estatísticos , Adulto , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin have shown benefit for preventing major ischemic events, albeit with increased bleeding risk, among patients in the general population with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are scarce in patients with cirrhosis and AF. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus rivaroxaban and versus warfarin in patients with cirrhosis and AF. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. claims data sets (Medicare and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database [2013 to 2022]). PARTICIPANTS: 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF initiating use of apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes included ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage or major gastrointestinal bleeding). Database-specific and pooled PS-matched rate differences (RDs) per 1000 person-years (PY) and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated, controlling for 104 preexposure covariates. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban initiators had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events than apixaban initiators (RD, 33.1 per 1000 PY [95% CI, 12.9 to 53.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.47 [CI, 1.11 to 1.94]) but no significant differences in rates of ischemic events or death. Consistently higher rates of major hemorrhage were found with rivaroxaban across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Warfarin initiators also had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage than apixaban initiators (RD, 26.1 per 1000 PY [CI, 6.8 to 45.3 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.38 [CI, 1.03 to 1.84]), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RD, 9.7 per 1000 PY [CI, 2.2 to 17.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 2.85 [CI, 1.24 to 6.59]). LIMITATION: Nonrandomized treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Among patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF, initiators of rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage and similar rates of ischemic events and death. Initiation of warfarin versus apixaban also contributed to significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events, including hemorrhagic stroke. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilação Atrial , Inibidores do Fator Xa , Hemorragia , Cirrose Hepática , Pirazóis , Piridonas , Rivaroxabana , Varfarina , Humanos , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , AVC Isquêmico/prevenção & controle , AVC Isquêmico/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maternal use of valproate during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Although most studies of other antiseizure medications have not shown increased risks of these disorders, there are limited and conflicting data regarding the risk of autism spectrum disorder associated with maternal topiramate use. METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of pregnant women and their children within two health care utilization databases in the United States, with data from 2000 through 2020. Exposure to specific antiseizure medications was defined on the basis of prescription fills from gestational week 19 until delivery. Children who had been exposed to topiramate during the second half of pregnancy were compared with those unexposed to any antiseizure medication during pregnancy with respect to the risk of autism spectrum disorder. Valproate was used as a positive control, and lamotrigine was used as a negative control. RESULTS: The estimated cumulative incidence of autism spectrum disorder at 8 years of age was 1.9% for the full population of children who had not been exposed to antiseizure medication (4,199,796 children). With restriction to children born to mothers with epilepsy, the incidence was 4.2% with no exposure to antiseizure medication (8815 children), 6.2% with exposure to topiramate (1030 children), 10.5% with exposure to valproate (800 children), and 4.1% with exposure to lamotrigine (4205 children). Propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios in a comparison with no exposure to antiseizure medication were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.65) for exposure to topiramate, 2.67 (95% CI, 1.69 to 4.20) for exposure to valproate, and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46) for exposure to lamotrigine. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of autism spectrum disorder was higher among children prenatally exposed to the studied antiseizure medications than in the general population. However, after adjustment for indication and other confounders, the association was substantially attenuated for topiramate and lamotrigine, whereas an increased risk remained for valproate. (Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health.).
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Lamotrigina , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Topiramato , Ácido Valproico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/induzido quimicamente , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/etiologia , Transtorno Autístico/induzido quimicamente , Transtorno Autístico/epidemiologia , Transtorno Autístico/etiologia , Lamotrigina/efeitos adversos , Lamotrigina/uso terapêutico , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/tratamento farmacológico , Topiramato/efeitos adversos , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Ácido Valproico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológicoAssuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/induzido quimicamente , Estudos de Coortes , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Artralgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
Importance: There are no data on patient-centered outcomes and health care costs by frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs). Objective: To compare home time, clinical events, and health care costs associated with OACs by frailty levels in older adults with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based cohort study assessed Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older with AF from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from January to December 2022. Exposures: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin use were measured from prescription claims. Frailty was measured using a validated claims-based frailty index. Main outcomes and measures: Outcome measures were (1) home time (days alive out of the hospital and skilled nursing facility) loss greater than 14 days; (2) a composite end point of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death; and (3) total cost per member per year after propensity score overlap weighting. Results: The weighted population comprised 136â¯551 beneficiaries, including 45â¯950 taking apixaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.3% female), 45â¯320 taking rivaroxaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.9% female), and 45â¯281 taking warfarin (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 52.0% female). Compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of home time lost greater than 14 days (risk difference per 100 persons, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.1]), composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 21.3 [95% CI, 16.4-26.2]), and total cost (mean difference, $890 [95% CI, $652-$1127]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Use of warfarin relative to apixaban was associated with increased home time lost (risk difference per 100 persons, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.9-3.5]) and composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 29.4 [95% CI, 24.5-34.3]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Compared with apixaban, warfarin was associated with lower total cost (mean difference, -$1166 [95% CI, -$1396 to -$937]) but higher cost when excluding OAC cost (mean difference, $1409 [95% CI, $1177 to $1642]) regardless of frailty levels. Conclusions and Relevance: In older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with increased home time and lower rates of clinical events than rivaroxaban and warfarin, especially for those with frailty. Apixaban was associated with lower total cost compared with rivaroxaban but higher cost compared with warfarin due to higher OAC cost. These findings suggest that apixaban may be preferred for older adults with AF, particularly those with frailty.