Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study.

Rationale & Objective: Older people with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex health care needs. Geriatric evaluation preceding decision making for kidney replacement is recommended in guidelines, but implementation is lacking in routine care. We aimed to evaluate implementation of geriatric assessment in CKD care. Study Design: Mixed methods implementation study. Setting & Participants: Dutch nephrology centers were approached for implementation of geriatric assessment in patients aged ≥70 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Quality Improvement Activities/Exposure: We implemented a consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment: a patient questionnaire and professionally administered test set comprising 16 instruments covering functional, cognitive, psychosocial, and somatic domains and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes: We aimed for implementation in 10 centers and 200 patients. Implementation was evaluated by (i) perceived enablers and barriers of implementation, including integration in work routines (Normalization Measure Development Tool) and (ii) relevance of the instruments to routine care for the target population. Analytical Approach: Variations in implementation practices were described based on field notes. The postimplementation survey among health care professionals was analyzed descriptively, using an explanatory qualitative approach for open-ended questions. Results: Geriatric assessment was implemented in 10 centers among 191 patients. Survey respondents (n = 71, 88% response rate) identified determinants that facilitated implementation, ie, multidisciplinary collaboration (with geriatricians) -meetings and reports and execution of assessments by nurses. Barriers to implementation were patient illiteracy or language barrier, time constraints, and patient burden. Professionals considered geriatric assessment sufficiently integrated into work routines (mean, 6.7/10 ± 2.0 [SD]) but also subject to improvement. Likewise, the relevance of geriatric assessment for routine care was scored as 7.8/10 ± 1.2. The Clinical Frailty Score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were perceived as the most relevant instruments. Limitations: Selection bias of interventions' early adopters may limit generalizability. Conclusions: Geriatric assessment could successfully be integrated in CKD care and was perceived relevant to health care professionals.

The number of older persons with kidney failure is increasing, many of whom have cognitive decline or are dependent on others for daily life tasks. These problems are often overlooked but relevant for future treatment choices, and they affect quality of life. We asked 10 health care centers to use tests and questionnaires to identify these issues, thus being able to offer additional support. We learned that it is possible to use these assessments in practice and that professionals found them relevant. Collaboration with geriatric departments was perceived valuable. However, there are also challenges, such as not having enough time and personnel and burden to patients. Understanding these possibilities and challenges is crucial for improving care for older patients with kidney failure.

Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients: results of a pragmatic approach.

PURPOSE: Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD. METHODS: A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment. RESULTS: Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment. CONCLUSION: This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD.

Epoetin Beta and C-Terminal Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background In patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease, correction of anemia with erythropoietin-stimulating agents targeting normal hemoglobin levels is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Emerging data suggest a direct effect of erythropoietin on fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), elevated levels of which have been associated with adverse outcomes. We investigate effects of erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with both chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease focusing on FGF23. Methods and Results In the EPOCARES (Erythropoietin in CardioRenal Syndrome) study, we randomized 56 anemic patients (median age 74 [interquartile range 69-80] years, 66% male) with both chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease into 3 groups, of which 2 received epoetin beta 50 IU/kg per week for 50 weeks, and the third group served as control. Measurements were performed at baseline and after 2, 26, and 50 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-model analysis. After 50 weeks of erythropoietin-stimulating agent treatment, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels increased. Similarly, C-terminal FGF23 levels, in contrast to intact FGF23 levels, rose significantly due to erythropoietin-stimulating agents as compared with the controls. During median follow-up for 5.7 (2.0-5.7) years, baseline C-terminal FGF23 levels were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 2.20; 95% CI, 1.35-3.59; P=0.002). Conclusions Exogenous erythropoietin increases C-terminal FGF23 levels markedly over a period of 50 weeks, elevated levels of which, even at baseline, are significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. The current results, in a randomized trial setting, underline the strong relationship between erythropoietin and FGF23 physiology in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00356733.

Switching iron sucrose to ferric carboxymaltose associates to better control of iron status in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of iron sucrose (IS) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in treating anemia in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been studied individually, a comparison of these two intravenous iron formulations has not yet been performed in HD patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective audit on records of 221 stable HD patients from different HD centers in the Netherlands, who were switched from IS to FCM on a 1:1 ratio. To assess the effect of the switch on iron status parameters, data from 3 time points before and 3 time points after the switch were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. Subanalyses were done in 2 subgroups of patients anemic or iron deficient at baseline. RESULTS: Hemoglobin increased in all groups (anemic [1.4 g/dL, P < 0.001] iron deficient [0.6 g/dL, P < 0.001]), while the weekly iron dose was significantly lower when patients received FCM compared to IS (48 vs 55 mg/week, P = 0.04). Furthermore, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation increased in all groups (anemic [64 µg/L, 5.0%, P < 0.001] iron deficient [76 µg/L, 3.6%, P < 0.001]). Finally, the darbepoetin α dose decreased significantly in all groups (anemic [- 16 µg/wk., P = 0.01] iron deficient [- 11 µg/wk., P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life study in HD patients, a switch from IS to FCM resulted in an improvement of iron status parameters despite a lower weekly dose of FCM. Furthermore, the ESA dose was reduced during FCM, while hemoglobin levels increased.

Differences in care burden of patients undergoing dialysis in different centres in the netherlands.

BACKGROUND: A classification model was developed to simplify planning of personnel at dialysis centres. This model predicted the care burden based on dialysis characteristics. However, patient characteristics and different dialysis centre categories might also influence the amount of care time required. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in care burden between different categories of dialysis centres and if specific patient characteristics predict nursing time needed for patient treatment. DESIGN: An observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients from 12 dialysis centres. MEASUREMENTS: In 12 dialysis centres, nurses filled out the classification list per patient and completed a form with patient characteristics. Nephrologists filled out the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Independent observers clocked the time nurses spent on separate steps of the dialysis for each patient. Dialysis centres were categorised into four types. Data were analysed using regression models. RESULTS: In contrast to other dialysis centres, academic centres needed 14 minutes more care time per patient per dialysis treatment than predicted in the classification model. No patient characteristics were found that influenced this difference. The only patient characteristic that predicted the time required was gender, with more time required to treat women. Gender did not affect the difference between measured and predicted care time. CONCLUSION: Differences in care burden were observed between academic and other centres, with more time required for treatment in academic centres. Contribution of patient characteristics to the time difference was minimal. The only patient characteristics that predicted care time were previous transplantation, which reduced the time required, and gender, with women requiring more care time.

[Parenteral iron therapy in chronic kidney disease or chronic heart failure]. / Parenterale ijzertoediening bij hart- of nierfalen.

Iron deficiency and anaemia occur frequently in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chronic heart failure (CHF) and are associated with lower quality of life and higher mortality. Treating anaemia with erythropoietic growth factors produces no improvement. In recent years, the focus has therefore shifted to correction of iron deficiency. Chronic inflammation in CKD increases the production of hepcidin, which blocks iron absorption from the intestine and leads to less efficient re-use of iron from the macrophages. In absolute iron deficiency the body's iron stores are depleted, whereas in functional iron deficiency the supply of iron is not sufficient to meet demand from the bone marrow. Normal or high ferritin levels do not exclude iron deficiency at tissue level. The iron saturation fraction is a more useful indicator. Parenteral iron therapy ameliorates in CHF the symptoms of iron deficiency, irrespective of the effect on haemoglobin levels. The long-term effects of intravenous iron on mortality and morbidity are still unknown.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in chronic cardiorenal failure is correlated with endogenous erythropoietin levels and decreases in response to low-dose erythropoietin treatment.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL), a tubular injury marker, is associated with iron metabolism in hemodialysis patients. We investigated whether serum NGAL levels reflect iron metabolism in combined chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CHF/CKD) and whether treatment with low-dose erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) modulates NGAL levels. METHODS: In the EPOCARES trial (ClinTrialsNCT00356733) serum NGAL, hepcidin-25, transferrin saturation (TSAT), reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-He) and endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) levels were measured. RESULTS: Baseline serum NGAL levels correlated with cystatin C (r=0.767, p<0.001) and baseline EPO levels (r=-0.395, p=0.003). There was no correlation with baseline TSAT, Ret-He, and hepcidin-25 levels. After two weeks, NGAL levels decreased in the ESA-group (p=0.02), while there was no change in the no-ESA group (p=0.62). The magnitude in NGAL decrease in the ESA-group correlated with baseline EPO levels (r=0.431, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to in HD patients, in combined CKD/ CHF, serum NGAL levels did not correlate with iron metabolism, hence NGAL might reflect tubular damage in these patients. NGAL levels inversely correlated with baseline EPO levels and decreased in response to short-term ESA treatment, which might reflect an effect of ESA on tubular damage. These findings need to be confirmed and alternative explanations should be evaluated.

High cumulative incidence of cancer in patients with cardio-renal-anaemia syndrome.

AIMS: The combination of chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic heart failure (HF), and anaemia, the so-called cardio-renal-anaemia syndrome (CRA) is associated with dysregulation of erythropoietin levels and inflammation. Both have been associated with the development of cancer. This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of cancer in patients with CRA, as compared with anaemic CKD and control patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients aged <80 years who attended the nephrology or cardiology outpatient clinics between March 2006 and November 2007 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective case-control study if haemoglobin <8.1 mmol/L (13 g/dL) and serum creatinine >80 mmol/L (0.90 mg/dL). Medical records dating back to 1996 were reviewed. The relationship between cancer and CRA, chronic HF, CKD, and anaemia was analysed using logistic regression analysis. Data from 1087 patients were reviewed. We identified 348 patients with both CKD and anaemia, of whom 132(38.3%) had CRA. The control group included 264 patients attending the hypertension outpatient clinic. Patients with CRA had a 19% cumulative incidence of cancer compared with 11% for patients with anaemia, CKD and no chronic HF, and 11% in the control group. The odds ratio (OR) for cancer was 1.8(95% CI 1.0-3.2) for the CRA group compared with the control group. Chronic HF was an independent risk factor for cancer after correction for age and gender (adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of cancer among patients with CRA is high compared with controls and to anaemic CKD patients without chronic HF. Chronic HF was an independent risk factor for cancer. These results stress the importance of clarifying the mechanisms involved in the development of cancer in CRA.