RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A disconnect appears to exist for medical students between learning drug facts in a basic science context and applying those facts in a clinical context when they begin working with authentic patients. In patients with kidney dysfunction, dosages of medications that are renally eliminated often need to be adjusted, due to potentially toxic accumulation in the body. To gain insight into the thought processes and gaps underlying student thinking, we developed this standardized patient (SP) case featuring a patient with drug-related renal dysfunction. METHODS: This activity was conducted in a simulation center, in a setting reminiscent of an emergency department. It took place over 2 days, with all 23 third-year medical students at our regional campus. After reporting to the simulation center at their assigned time, students completed four different medication scenarios. This specific case involved two parts. The first part, an SP-student encounter, was allotted 15 minutes, followed by 1 minute to walk to a computer station. For the second part, writing a SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, and plan) note, 15 minutes were allotted. This was followed by 3 minutes for the SP to provide student feedback and 1 minute to rotate to the next station. In total, 35 minutes were allotted for each student to complete the case. RESULTS: All third-year medical students at our regional campus completed this activity at the midpoint of their academic year. Students were well prepared to gather necessary background information from the standardized patient. However, few made the connection between the patient's symptoms and the way in which her medications were contributing. Nor did they recommend an appropriate course of action for medications that required adjustment. DISCUSSION: From this activity, we gained insight into the student thought process with regard to medication management and have been able to develop new ways of revisiting basic science concepts in clinically relevant contexts to help bridge the gap between the basic and clinical components of pharmacology education.