Motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors according to parenthood status: a national study from the French CECOS network.

STUDY QUESTION: In a non-commercial national gamete donation programme, do the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors differ according to their parenthood status? SUMMARY ANSWER: Moderate differences exist between non-parent and parent candidate donors in motivations for gamete donation and representations as well as in personality characteristics. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have analysed the motivations and experiences of oocyte or sperm donors, but mainly in countries where gamete donation is a commercial transaction, and very few studies have reported results of personality traits using personality inventory tests. No study has specifically investigated the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate gamete donors according to parenthood status. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A prospective study was carried out including 1021 candidate donors from 21 centres (in university hospitals) of the national sperm and egg banking network in France between November 2016 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: In total, 1021 candidate gamete donors were included in the study. During their first visit, male (n = 488) and female candidate donors (n = 533) completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, their motivations for donation and their representations of donation, infertility and family. Secondly, a NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) exploring the Big Five personality traits was completed online. Results were compared between parent and non-parent candidate donors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Altruistic values were the principal motive for donation irrespective of parenthood status. Reassurance about their fertility or preservation of sperm for future use was more often reported in non-parent than in parent candidate donors. With regard to representation of gamete donation or of the family, independently of their parenthood status, candidate donors more frequently selected social rather than biological representations. Mean personality characteristics were in the normal range. Non-parent candidate donors had higher scores on openness and depression than parents, while parent candidate donors appeared more social than non-parents. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The personality characteristics inventory was not completed by all candidate donors included in the study. However, family status did not differ between the two groups (NEO-PI-R completed (n = 525) or not), while the group who completed the NEO-PI-R had a higher educational level. This national study was performed in a country where gamete donation is subject to strict legislation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In a global context where reproductive medicine is commercialized and gamete donor resources are limited, this study found that altruism and social representations of gamete donation and family are the main motivations for gamete donation in a country which prohibits financial incentive. These findings are relevant for health policy and for gamete donation information campaigns. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Grant from the Agence de la Biomédecine, France. The authors have nothing to disclose related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

[Systematic karyotyping before ICSI: A necessary procedure? Analysis of case studies in the Nancy University Hospital Fertility Centre]. / Le caryotype avant ICSI, une procédure à abandonner ? Étude de pratiques au centre d'AMP du CHRU de Nancy.

INTRODUCTION: A constitutional karyotype is often assayed for the couple before ICSI management. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of chromosomal abnormality in an infertile population, the impact on the care of couples and its cost. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was carried out at the Fertility Center of the University Hospital of Nancy, including all infertile couples who underwent a karyotype analysis from June 2009 to December 2016. RESULTS: 1252 couples were included. 7.9% had at least one abnormal karyotype. A change in care affected 22% of these couples, i.e. 1.7% of the total population. 9% of couples with karyotype abnormality underwent PGD. In the male population, the percentage of abnormal spermograms is significantly higher in the group with karyotype abnormality compared to the control group (85.7% vs. 46.5%, P<0.001). DISCUSSION: The constitutional karyotype, due to its high economic and human cost, and limited interest, is a screening method for chromosomal abnormalities that has no place systematically before performing IVF. The future lies in the restriction of the indications for prescribing the karyotype as well as in the realization of PGS in targeted situations.

[Do folates have an impact on fertility?]. / Les folates: quel impact sur la fertilité?

Folates are group B vitamins involved in the one-carbon metabolism. They are required for purine and pyrimidine, and thus DNA synthesis, as well as for the remethylation of homocysteine into methionine which is further metabolized into S-adenosylmethionine, the universal methyl donor for transmethylation of DNA. By this way, folates play a key role in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Folate deficiency, either by insufficient nutritional uptake or linked to some single nucleotide polymorphism, will lead to an impaired DNA synthesis and repair, a hypomethylation of DNA and other molecules, and homocysteine accumulation. This situation has been associated with several pathologies, such as cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, and pregnancy complications. However, much less is known until now about the impact of one-carbon metabolism on initial events of human reproduction, from gametogenesis to early embryonic development. The present review will deal with these aspects of folate metabolism with respect to male and female fertility.