Correction to: Jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy is associated with better short-term absorption capacity and quality of life in early-stage gastric cancer patients.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that one of the authors' names is spelled incorrectly.

Jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy is associated with better short-term absorption capacity and quality of life in early-stage gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding the best reconstruction style after total gastrectomy (TG). Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is a simple option for gastrointestinal tract reconstruction. Recently, jejunal pouch reconstruction has been suggested as an appropriate approach. We compared the postoperative outcomes of the two surgical approaches using a well-characterized cohort of gastric carcinoma patients. METHODS: A total of 60 patients who underwent TG were divided into two groups according to the reconstruction style. Both groups were compared regarding patient characteristics, perioperative data and quality of life (QoL), which was assessed using the Spitzer QoL index (QLI) and Visick grade. The incidence of long-term surgery-related complications, including reflux oesophagitis, dumping syndrome, and retention syndrome, was also compared to evaluate postoperative restoration. RESULTS: Both study groups were comparable with respect to general patient characteristics. No mortality or no significant differences in surgery-related data were found except in the operation time. Compared to Orr Roux-en-Y reconstruction, pouch reconstruction was associated with a longer procedure time, a lower incidence of dumping/retention syndrome and better QoL parameters (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, jejunal pouch reconstruction after TG was superior to the traditional Roux-n-Y oesophagojejunostomy with respect to improved dietary intake and QoL.

Antiperistaltic Side-to-Side Ileorectal Anastomosis is Associated with a Better Short-Term Fecal Continence and Quality of Life in Slow Transit Constipation Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of refractory slow transit constipation (STC) is traditionally performed using end-to-side ileorectal anastomosis (SE-IRA) with total abdominal colectomy (TAC). Antiperistaltic side-to-side (SS) IRA is suggested to be a superior approach. Employing a well-characterized cohort of STC patients, we compared the postoperative outcomes of the 2 surgical approaches. METHODS: A total of 42 patients underwent TAC for refractory idiopathic STC. Twenty patients were treated using traditional SE-IRA whereas 22 patients were treated using SS-IRA. Patients were evaluated at 3 and 6 months as well as at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Both groups were compared for patient characteristics, perioperative data and quality of life. Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GQILI) were adopted for evaluating postoperative recovery. RESULTS: Both study groups were comparable with respect to general patient characteristics, disease severity and post-operative complications. Fewer than 30% of all patients reported substantial dissatisfaction with surgical outcomes in both the groups. The SS-IRA group was associated with a lower postoperative CCIS (p < 0.05) and a better GQILI (p < 0.05) than that of the SE-IRA group during early follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION: In this study, SS-IRA was superior to traditional SE-IRA for the treatment of STC with respect to post-operative outcomes, and especially during early follow-up.