Bioequivalence and food effect of a fixed-dose combination of macitentan and tadalafil: Adaptive design in the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical studies to accommodate imposed limitations. In this study, the bioequivalence part could not be conducted as planned. Thus, the aim was to demonstrate bioequivalence, using an adaptive study design, of tadalafil in fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets of macitentan/tadalafil with single macitentan and tadalafil (Canadian-sourced) tablets and assess the effect of food on FDC tablets in healthy subjects. This Phase 1, single-center, open-label, single-dose, two-part, two-period, randomized, crossover study enrolled 62 subjects. Tadalafil bioequivalence as part of FDC of macitentan/tadalafil (10/40 mg) with single-component tablets of macitentan (10 mg) and tadalafil (40 mg) was determined by pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment under fasted conditions. The effect of food on FDC was evaluated under fed and fasted conditions. Fasted 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within bioequivalence limits for tadalafil and macitentan. Fed and fasted 90% CIs for area under the curve (AUC) GMR were within bioequivalence limits. However, 90% CIs for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) GMR for macitentan and tadalafil were outside bioequivalence limits. One FDC-treated subject experienced a serious adverse event of transient ischemic attack (bioequivalence part). To address pandemic-imposed limitations, an adaptive study design was implemented to demonstrate that the FDC tablet was bioequivalent to the free combination of macitentan and tadalafil (Canadian-sourced). No clinically significant differences in PK were determined between fed and fasted conditions; the FDC formulation could be taken irrespective of meals. The FDC formulation under fasted and fed conditions was well tolerated with no clinically relevant differences in safety profiles between the treatment groups. NCT Number: NCT04235270.

Diagnostic delay and characterization of the clinical prodrome in AL amyloidosis among 1523 US adults diagnosed between 2001 and 2019.

Light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a multisystem disorder with a high early mortality and diagnostic delays of >1 year from symptom onset. This retrospective observational study sought to characterize the clinical prodrome and diagnostic delay to inform early detection. We identified 1523 adults with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis in the Optum de-identified Clinformatics® Datamart US healthcare claims database as those with ≥2 new diagnosis codes for AL or other amyloidosis in 90 days with ≥1 multiple myeloma treatment within 730 days, excluding patients with prior hereditary or secondary amyloidosis and Familial Mediterranean Fever. We considered 34 signs/symptoms using diagnosis codes in all observable time on or before AL amyloidosis diagnosis. Sign/symptom prevalence was compared to that of 1:4 matched population controls. The overlap and sequence of signs/symptoms and the median time from first sign/symptom to AL amyloidosis diagnosis were explored. Healthcare utilization was summarized. The most common individual AL amyloidosis signs/symptoms were malaise/fatigue (61%) and dyspnea (59%). Cardiac signs/symptoms were observed in 77% of patients, followed by renal (62%) and neurologic (59%) signs/symptoms. Multisystem involvement (≥3 systems) was present in 54%. Monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 29% before diagnosis. Median time from symptom onset to AL amyloidosis diagnosis was 2.7 years. Healthcare utilization was high between first AL amyloidosis signs/symptoms and diagnosis, with 50% visiting ≥5 physician types. AL amyloidosis patients have a lengthy and complex clinical prodrome. Novel approaches to early diagnosis are needed to improve outcomes.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of DS-1040 Drug-Drug Interactions With Aspirin, Clopidogrel, and Enoxaparin.

DS-1040, a novel low-molecular-weight inhibitor of activated thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, is under development for the treatment of thromboembolic diseases including venous thromboembolism and acute ischemic stroke. Here we describe the results of 3 studies that evaluated the safety and tolerability of DS-1040 along with the effect on DS-1040 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, when dosed alone or when coadministered with aspirin (NCT02071004), clopidogrel (NCT02560688), or enoxaparin in healthy subjects. Concomitant administration of single-dose DS-1040 with multiple-dose aspirin, multiple-dose clopidogrel, or single-dose enoxaparin, consistent with clinically relevant dose regimens, was safe and well tolerated with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, bleeding-related TEAEs, and no significant changes in coagulation parameters. DS-1040 did not prolong bleeding time when administered concomitantly with aspirin or clopidogrel. In the aspirin study, DS-1040 PK was evaluated following the concomitant administration with multiple-dose aspirin, where the plasma DS-1040 exposure (peak plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUCinf ]) was to be similar to the data previously published in the first-in-human study of DS-1040 in healthy subjects. The PK parameters of DS-1040 coadministered with clopidogrel were similar to those of DS-1040 alone, with small increases in geometric means for Cmax (7%) and AUClast (9%). When coadministered with enoxaparin, the PK parameters of DS-1040 were not affected (1.1% and 1.5% decreases in geometric means for Cmax and AUClast , respectively). Therefore, concomitant administration of DS-1040 and clopidogrel or enoxaparin did not demonstrate PK drug-drug interactions.

Effect of DS-8500a, a Novel G Protein-Coupled Receptor 119 Agonist, on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Non-clinical study data suggest that DS-8500a, a G protein-coupled receptor 119 agonist, exhibits antidiabetic activity, inhibition of some transporters and induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Statins are substrates for some transporters and CYP3A that may be coadministered with DS-8500a in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential effects of DS-8500a on the pharmacokinetics of statins, we evaluated the effects of repeated oral administration of DS-8500a 75 mg on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in healthy adults. METHODS: We performed two single-center, open-label, single-sequence studies. In Study I, subjects received single-dose rosuvastatin 10 mg (Period A) and DS-8500a 75 mg once daily + single-dose rosuvastatin 10 mg (Period B). In Study II, subjects received single-dose atorvastatin 10 mg (Period A) and DS-8500a 75 mg once daily + single-dose atorvastatin 10 mg (Period B). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: In Study I, the Cmax and AUC of rosuvastatin increased by 66% and 33%, respectively, when coadministered with DS-8500a, versus rosuvastatin alone. In Study II, the Cmax of atorvastatin increased by 28%, but AUC remained unchanged following coadministration with DS-8500a, versus atorvastatin alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate and mostly unrelated to the study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of DS-8500a increased exposure to rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. This short-term study suggests that the impact of DS-8500a coadministration on atorvastatin exposure is limited and may not be clinically relevant. Nevertheless, caution may be necessary when patients are coadministered rosuvastatin with DS-8500a. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03699774. JAPAN PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION CENTER IDENTIFIER: JapicCTI-152878.

First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Oral Formulation of DS-1040, an Inhibitor of the Activated Form of Thrombin-Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

DS-1040, a low-molecular-weight imidazole derivative, inhibits the enzymatic activity of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa), enhancing endogenous tissue plasminogen activator-triggered fibrinolysis. This first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an oral formulation of DS-1040. Healthy adults (aged 20-45 years; N = 56) were randomized 3:1 to receive DS-1040 orally administered as single ascending doses (50, 100, 200, or 400 mg) or placebo, or DS-1040 multiple ascending doses (100 mg once daily, 200 mg once daily, or 150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 14 days. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were assessed. All doses of DS-1040 were well tolerated; no serious/severe adverse events (AEs) or discontinuations due to AEs occurred. DS-1040 had no effect on coagulation parameters, and no treatment-related trends in the bleeding time were observed. DS-1040 exposure (peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve) increased in a dose-proportional manner across the single-dose range. With multiple doses, steady state was achieved by day 7 with minimal accumulation (mean accumulation ratio 1.15-1.25), and the PK was time-independent. After 72 hours, approximately 10% of the DS-1040 400-mg single dose was recovered in urine as intact parent drug. The mean terminal half-life ranged from 17.2 to 24.9 hours, which was similar to previous intravenous administration data. Dose-dependent inhibition of total TAFIa activity was observed following single and multiple doses of oral DS-1040. The safety and PK/PD profiles of oral DS-1040 in healthy subjects support further clinical development.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mirogabalin in healthy subjects: Results from phase 1 studies.

Three phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) studies were conducted in healthy men and women to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and PK/PD of mirogabalin administration with or without food and to guide the dose selection and regimen for phase 2 and 3 clinical development. The 3 studies included 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies, and 1 open-label, crossover study to evaluate the PK of mirogabalin administered under fasting and fed (high-fat meal) conditions. Forty-eight and 47 healthy volunteers completed the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. Thirty subjects were enrolled and completed the food effect study. Mirogabalin was well tolerated in the fed and fasted states. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)-dizziness and somnolence-were expected based on mirogabalin's mechanism of action. Subjects receiving the highest mirogabalin doses (50 and 75 mg single dose) showed greater dizziness and sedation and higher rates of TEAEs than subjects receiving 3-30 mg. After oral administration, mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration, ∼1 hour) and eliminated through urine unchanged (61%-72% urinary excretion). Exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after single or multiple mirogabalin doses. No significant accumulation occurred with multiple doses over 14 days. After single doses of mirogabalin (15 mg), the bioavailability was considered equivalent in the fed and fasted states, indicating that mirogabalin can be taken without food restrictions. Based on these data, mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily was selected as the highest target dose for further clinical development.

Coadministration of probenecid and cimetidine with mirogabalin in healthy subjects: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, drug-drug interaction study.

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to assess the individual effects of probenecid and cimetidine on mirogabalin exposure. METHODS: This phase 1, open-label, crossover study randomized healthy adults to receive three treatment regimens, each separated by ≥5-day washout: a single oral dose of mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2, mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus probenecid 500 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4, and mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus cimetidine 400 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4. RESULTS: Coadministration of mirogabalin with probenecid or cimetidine increased the maximum and total mirogabalin exposure. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of probenecid were 128.7% (121.9-135.7%) and 176.1% (171.9-180.3%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of cimetidine were 117.1% (111.0-123.6%) and 143.7% (140.3-147.2%), respectively. Mean (standard deviation) renal clearance of mirogabalin (l h-1 ) was substantially slower after probenecid [6.67 (1.53)] or cimetidine [7.17 (1.68)] coadministration, compared with mirogabalin alone [11.3 (2.39)]. Coadministration of probenecid or cimetidine decreased mirogabalin mean (standard deviation) apparent total body clearance [10.5 (2.33) and 12.8 (2.67) l h-1 , respectively, vs. 18.4 (3.93) for mirogabalin alone]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater magnitude of change in mirogabalin exposure was observed when coadministered with a drug that inhibits both renal and metabolic clearance (probenecid) vs. a drug that only affects renal clearance (cimetidine). However, as the increase in exposure is not clinically significant (>2-fold), no a priori dose adjustment is recommended.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirogabalin When Coadministered With Lorazepam, Zolpidem, Tramadol, or Ethanol: Results From Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Subjects.

Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period drug-drug interaction studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions between mirogabalin and commonly used central nervous system depressants. Mirogabalin or placebo was administered alone or with single-dose lorazepam, zolpidem, tramadol, ethanol, or interacting drug placebo. Safety was assessed and serial samples for pharmacokinetic parameters were collected for up to 48 hours postdose. PD assessments included body sway (except tramadol), digit symbol substitution test, vertigo symptom scale short form, brief ataxia rating scale, and the Bond and Lader visual analog scale. Coadministration of mirogabalin with any of the 4 drugs did not cause any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions. Peak mirogabalin concentration decreased by 28% (least squares mean ratio, 0.72; 90% confidence interval, [CI] 0.67, 0.76) following tramadol coadministration, and increased by 20% (least squares mean ratio, 1.20; 90%CI, 1.12, 1.28) following ethanol coadministration. Mirogabalin alone had little to no effect on PD parameters, but coadministration of mirogabalin with either lorazepam or ethanol increased the PD effects in body sway and digit symbol substitution test assays. Mirogabalin/lorazepam and mirogabalin/zolpidem increased occurrence of somnolence. Increased incidence of nausea and headache was noted with mirogabalin/tramadol and mirogabalin/ethanol, respectively.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single and Repeated Doses of Mirogabalin in Healthy Asian Volunteers.

Mirogabalin is a novel, preferentially selective α2 δ-1 ligand under investigation to treat neuropathic pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of various doses of mirogabalin in healthy subjects of different ethnicities. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, sequential, ascending-dose study evaluated single (10-40 mg) and repeated (10, 15 mg twice a day) doses of mirogabalin in Japanese subjects, and a single dose of mirogabalin in Korean, Chinese, and white subjects. Mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 1 hour, and rapidly eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life of 2 to 3 hours. Single-dose mirogabalin pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between Asian and white subjects. Exposure increased proportionally as mirogabalin dose increased in Japanese subjects. Mean mirogabalin steady-state clearance and volume of distribution values were comparable across dose levels. No accumulation of mirogabalin was observed on repeated dosing in Japanese subjects. Mirogabalin had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in Asian and white subjects at doses up to 15 mg twice a day for 7 days. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (somnolence, headache, and dizziness) were consistent with the known mechanism of action and safety profile of mirogabalin.

Single-dose ciraparantag safely and completely reverses anticoagulant effects of edoxaban.

Of the new direct oral anticoagulants, direct factor Xa inhibitors are limited by the absence of a proven reversal agent. We assessed the safety, tolerability and impact on anticoagulation reversal of ciraparantag (PER977) alone and following a 60 mg dose of the FXa inhibitor edoxaban. Escalating, single IV doses of ciraparantag were administered alone and following a 60 mg oral dose of edoxaban in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion to healthy subjects. Serial assessments of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of ciraparantag were performed. Eighty male subjects completed the study. Following edoxaban (60 mg), a single IV dose of ciraparantag (100 to 300 mg) demonstrated full reversal of anticoagulation within 10 minutes and sustained for 24 hours. Fibrin diameter within clots was restored to normal 30 minutes after a single dose of 100 to 300 mg ciraparantag as determined by scanning electron microscopy and change in fibrin diameter quantified by automated image analysis. Potentially related adverse events were periorbital and facial flushing and cool sensation following IV injection of ciraparantag. Renal excretion of ciraparantag metabolite was the main elimination route. There was no evidence of procoagulant activity following ciraparantag as assessed by D-dimer, prothrombin fragments 1.2, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor levels. In conclusion, ciraparantag in healthy subjects is safe and well tolerated with minor, non-dose limiting adverse events. Baseline haemostasis was restored from the anticoagulated state with doses of 100 to 300 mg ciraparantag within 10-30 minutes of administration and sustained for at least 24 hours.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Edoxaban When Administered Alone or After Switching from Rivaroxaban or Dabigatran Etexilate in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily direct factor Xa inhibitor. To support the possibility that patients may choose to switch treatment from another nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant to edoxaban, this clinical study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of edoxaban after switching from rivaroxaban or dabigatran etexilate to edoxaban. METHODS: In this open-label, three-period, crossover study, healthy subjects received 3 days of edoxaban 60 mg daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg daily, or dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily, followed by edoxaban 60 mg on day 4. RESULTS: Day 4 edoxaban pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for all treatments. The peak effect of edoxaban on prothrombin time (PT) after 4 days of edoxaban only was 21.8 ± 2.46 s; after switching from rivaroxaban to edoxaban, peak effect on PT was similar at 21.8 ± 2.88 s. After switching from dabigatran etexilate to edoxaban, least squares mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 2 h after administration was 47.6 vs 35.0 s for edoxaban alone. The treatment difference was 12.8 s (95% confidence interval 10.5-15.1; p < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis revealed that predose aPTT was elevated on day 3 of dabigatran etexilate administration, and on day 4, indicating a carryover effect from dabigatran. All treatments were well tolerated and there were no safety concerns upon switching, with no increased risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that switching to edoxaban from either rivaroxaban or dabigatran etexilate at the time of the next dose is well tolerated and maintains coagulation status.

The impact of a three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate on the anticoagulatory effects of the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban.

BACKGROUND: Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is a once-daily, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant. There is no established method to reverse the activity of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in cases of hemorrhage or urgent surgery. This study evaluated the ability of a 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (3F-PCC) to reverse the anticoagulatory effects of edoxaban. METHODS: In this phase 1 study, 24 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 60 or 180mg edoxaban, followed by placebo, 25IU/kg 3F-PCC, or 50IU/kg 3F-PCC. Edoxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including the primary endpoint of prothrombin time (PT) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), were assessed. D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 and 2 (F1+2) were also measured. RESULTS: Overall, there were no apparent consistent effects of 3F-PCC on edoxaban pharmacokinetics. Administration of 3F-PCC 25 or 50IU/kg with edoxaban 60 or 180mg did not substantially accelerate the return of PT to baseline levels. However, infusion of 3F-PCC 25 and 50IU/kg did substantially accelerate return to baseline of ETP compared with placebo. D-dimer and F1+2 data did not indicate any lasting procoagulant effects of 3F-PCC infusion, although a transient increase in F1+2 was noted during and after 3F-PCC infusion. Edoxaban and 3F-PCC co-administration was well tolerated in normal healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: There was no apparent reversal of PT prolongation with 3F-PCC following edoxaban infusion, but ETP was completely reversed. Co-administration of 3F-PCC was well tolerated, but a dose-dependent increase in F1+2 may reflect a procoagulant risk.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of edoxaban in end-stage renal disease subjects undergoing haemodialysis.

Edoxaban is an oral, direct, once-daily, factor Xa inhibitor developed for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Among elderly patients who require anticoagulation therapies, some may have end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This open-label, phase 1, randomised, two-way crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban in 10 subjects on haemodialysis. Eligible subjects with ESRD on chronic haemodialysis received a single, oral dose of edoxaban 15 mg 2 hours (h) prior to (on-dialysis) or in between (off-dialysis) haemodialysis sessions. Haemodialysis resulted in a minor decrease in mean total exposure (AUC0-∞; 676.2 ng·h/ml) as compared with that observed in subjects off-dialysis (691.7 ng·h/ml). Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) values were comparable between on-dialysis and off-dialysis treatments (53.3 vs 56.3 ng/ml, respectively). Mean apparent total body clearance (CL/F) values were 24.1 and 22.5 l/h during the on-dialysis and off-dialysis treatment periods, respectively. Dialyser clearance was 5.7 l/h and haemodialysis clearance was 6.1 l/h. Haemodialysis clearance was only 6.1 l/h, suggesting that it only accounts for one-fourth of the total clearance in these subjects. A single, oral dose of 15 mg of edoxaban was well tolerated by subjects with ESRD. In conclusion, based on these single-dose PK data, a supplementary dose of edoxaban may not be required following a haemodialysis session. Importantly, haemodialysis is not an effective mechanism for removal of edoxaban from the blood.

Edoxaban effects on bleeding following punch biopsy and reversal by a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: The oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban has demonstrated safety and efficacy in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. This study investigated the reversal of edoxaban's effects on bleeding measures and biomarkers by using a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a phase 1 study conducted at a single site. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study to determine the reversal effect of descending doses of 4F-PCC on bleeding duration and bleeding volume following edoxaban treatment. A total of 110 subjects (17 in part 1, 93 in part 2) were treated. Intravenous administration of 4F-PCC 50, 25, or 10 IU/kg following administration of edoxaban (60 mg) dose-dependently reversed edoxaban's effects on bleeding duration and endogenous thrombin potential, with complete reversal at 50 IU/kg. Effects on prothrombin time were partially reversed at 50 IU/kg. A similar trend was seen for bleeding volume. CONCLUSIONS: The 4F-PCC dose-dependently reversed the effects of edoxaban (60 mg), with complete reversal of bleeding duration and endogenous thrombin potential and partial reversal of prothrombin time following 50 IU/kg. Edoxaban alone and in combination with 4F-PCC was safe and well tolerated in these healthy subjects. A dose of 50 IU/kg 4F-PCC may be suitable for reversing edoxaban anticoagulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02047565.

Effects of Extended-Release Niacin and Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

The use of multiple lipid-modifying agents with different mechanisms of action is often required to regulate lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia. During combination therapy, alterations in the pharmacokinetics of any of the drugs used and their metabolites may occur. Three separate open-label, randomized, crossover studies evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between extended-release niacin (with and without concomitant laropiprant) and simvastatin in healthy subjects. Study 1 used single doses of extended-release niacin and simvastatin; study 2 used multiple-dose coadministration of extended-release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin in healthy subjects; and study 3 used single doses of both extended-release niacin and the coadministration of extended-release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin in healthy Chinese subjects. During each treatment period, plasma samples were collected predose and at prespecified postdose time points for pharmacokinetic analyses. The safety and tolerability of simvastatin with and without coadministered extended-release niacin (or extended-release niacin/laropiprant) were assessed by clinical evaluation of adverse experiences. In 2 studies in healthy subjects, modest increases in exposure to simvastatin acid (by ∼60%) by extended-release niacin and extended-release niacin/laropiprant were observed. Based on the clinical experience with simvastatin, these effects are not believed to be clinically meaningful. In the third study on healthy Chinese subjects, no statistically meaningful increases in exposure to simvastatin by extended-release niacin and extended-release niacin/laropiprant were observed. In all populations examined in these studies, the coadministration of extended-release niacin and simvastatin was generally well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-5046, a bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) agonist, in healthy patients.

MK-5046 is an orally active, potent, selective agonist of the orphan G protein-coupled receptor bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) that is under evaluation for treatment of obesity. We report the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral doses of MK-5046 (10-160 mg) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy and obese male volunteers. MK-5046 exposure increased dose proportionally, and MK-5046 was eliminated with an apparent terminal half-life of 1.5 to 3.5 hours. Single doses transiently increased blood pressure. Patients reported adverse events (erections and feeling hot, cold, and/or jittery) that coincided with time of occurrence (T(max)) and increased with increasing dose. No changes were observed in body temperature, heart rate, plasma glucose levels, or feelings of hunger/satiety. The blood pressure and thermal experiences attenuated with a second dose 6 hours after the first. Additionally, the erections suggest a possible, unanticipated, role for BRS-3 in reproductive physiology. Oral administration of MK-5046 achieves plasma concentrations that are projected to activate BRS-3 and therefore should be suitable for exploring its biological role in humans.

The effects of laropiprant, a selective prostaglandin D2 receptor 1 antagonist, on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel or aspirin.

Laropiprant (LRPT) is being developed in combination with Merck's extended-release niacin (ERN) formulation for the treatment of dyslipidemia. LRPT, an antagonist of the prostaglandin PGD2 receptor DP1, reduces flushing symptoms associated with ERN. LRPT also has affinity for the thromboxane A2 receptor TP (approximately 190-fold less potent at TP compared with DP1). Aspirin and clopidogrel are two frequently used anti-clotting agents with different mechanisms of action. Since LRPT may potentially be co-administered with either one of these agents, these studies were conducted to assess the effects of steady-state LRPT on the antiplatelet activity of steady-state clopidogrel or aspirin. Bleeding time at 24 h post-dose (trough) was pre-specified as the primary pharmacodynamic endpoint in both studies. Two separate, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies evaluated the effects of multiple-dose LRPT on the pharmacodynamics of multiple-dose clopidogrel or aspirin. Healthy subjects were randomized to once-daily oral doses of LRPT 40 mg or placebo to LRTP co-administered with clopidogrel 75 mg or aspirin 81 mg for 7 days with at least a 21-day washout between treatments. In both studies, bleeding time and platelet aggregation were assessed 4 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 7. Comparability was declared if the 90% confidence interval for the estimated geometric mean ratio ([LRPT+clopidogrel]/clopidogrel alone or [LRPT+aspirin]/aspirin alone) for bleeding time at 24 hours post-dose on Day 7 was contained within (0.66, 1.50). Concomitant daily administration of LRPT 40 mg with clopidogrel 75 mg or aspirin 81 mg resulted in an approximate 4-5% increase in bleeding time at 24 hours after the last dose vs. bleeding time after treatment with clopidogrel or aspirin alone, demonstrating that the treatments had comparable effects on bleeding time. Percent inhibition of platelet aggregation was not significantly different between LRPT co-administered with clopidogrel or aspirin vs. clopidogrel or aspirin alone at 24 hours post-dose at steady state. At 4 hours after the last dose, co-administration of LRPT 40 mg resulted in 3% and 41% increase in bleeding time vs. bleeding time after treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel alone, respectively. Co-administration of LPRT with clopidogrel or aspirin was generally well tolerated in healthy subjects. Co-administration of multiple doses of LRPT 40 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg or aspirin 81 mg had no clinically important effects on bleeding time or platelet aggregation.

A single supratherapeutic dose of rolofylline does not prolong the QTcF interval in healthy volunteers.

Rolofylline is a potent, selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist that was under development for the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal function impairment. The 30-mg dose of rolofylline administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours for 3 days represented the anticipated recommended clinical regimen of rolofylline. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study performed with a single 2-hour intravenous infusion of 60 mg rolofylline, placebo, or oral moxifloxacin in healthy subjects. Plasma samples were collected for determination of rolofylline, M1-trans, and M1-cis pharmacokinetic parameters. The upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the placebo-adjusted least squares mean change from baseline in QTcF interval for rolofylline was less than 5 msec at every time point. Moxifloxacin demonstrated an increase in QTcF of greater than 10 msec at 2, 2.5, and 3 hours postdose, thus establishing the sensitivity of the assay to detect modest increases in QTcF interval. Mean Cmax values of 1947.4, 739.2, and 54.8 nM were attained for rolofylline and its metabolites M1-trans and M1-cis, respectively, which were 2.2- to 3.1-fold higher than historic Cmax values seen at the anticipated clinical dose and regimen. Adenosine A1 receptor antagonism from a single supratherapeutic intravenous dose of 60 mg rolofylline over 2 hours was generally well tolerated and did not prolong the QTcF interval relative to placebo.

The effects of multiple doses of rolofylline on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of midazolam in healthy subjects.

Rolofylline is a potent, selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist that was under development for the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal function impairment. This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study in 19 healthy adult volunteers to examine the effect of multiple intravenous rolofylline doses on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. In period 1, subjects received a single oral dose of midazolam 7.5 mg on day 1. In period 2, subjects received 30 mg, 4-hour infusions of rolofylline (intended clinical dose and duration) once daily for 4 consecutive days; midazolam 7.5 mg was coadministered on day 4. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-infinity and Cmax of midazolam in the presence/absence of rolofylline were 1.20 (1.12-1.29) and 1.17 (1.03-1.32), respectively. The apparent terminal half-life (t1/2) for midazolam was similar in the presence/absence of rolofylline (4.31 and 4.27 hours, respectively). The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for AUC0-infinity and Cmax of 1'-hydroxymidazolam in the presence/absence of rolofylline were 1.04 (0.96-1.13) and 0.98 (0.84-1.14), respectively. The t1/2 for 1'-hydroxymidazolam was slightly higher in the presence relative to absence of rolofylline (4.24 and 3.17 hours, respectively). Multiple doses of intravenous rolofylline 30 mg for 4 days were generally well tolerated and did not result in clinically important inhibition of CYP3A4 as indicated by little or no change in the pharmacokinetics of midazolam.