Impact of baseline HIV-1 tropism on viral response and CD4 cell count gains in HIV-infected patients receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Viral tropism influences the natural history of human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) disease: X4 viruses are associated with faster decreases in CD4 cell count. There is scarce information about the influence of viral tropism on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Baseline plasma samples from patients recruited to the ArTEN (Atazanavir/ritnoavir vs. Nevirapine on a background of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine) trial were retrospectively tested for HIV-1 tropism using the genotypic tool geno2pheno(FPR=5.75%). ArTEN compared nevirapine with atazanavir-ritonavir, both along with tenofovir-emtricitabine, in drug-naïve patients. RESULTS: Of 569 ArTEN patients, 428 completed 48 weeks of therapy; 282 of these received nevirapine and 146 of these received atazanavir-ritonavir. Overall, non-B subtypes of HIV-1 were recognized in 96 patients (22%) and X4 viruses were detected in 55 patients (14%). At baseline, patients with X4 viruses had higher plasma HIV RNA levels (5.4 vs 5.2 log copies/mL, respectively; P = .044) and lower CD4 cell counts (145 vs 188 cells/µL, respectively; P < .001) than those with R5 strains. At week 48, virologic responses were lower in patients with X4 viruses than in patients with R5 viruses (77% vs 92%, respectively; P = .009). Multivariate analysis confirmed HIV-1 tropism as an independent predictor of virologic response at week 24 (P = .012). This association was extended to week 48 (P = .007) in clade B viruses. Conversely, CD4 cell count recovery was not influenced by baseline HIV-1 tropism. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1 tropism is an independent predictor of virologic response to first-line antiretroviral therapy. In contrast, it does not seem to influence CD4 cell count recovery. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00389207.

Asking the right questions: developing evidence-based strategies for treating HIV in women and children.

In July 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued formal revisions of its guidelines on the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV. The new guidelines greatly expand eligibility for treatment of adults and children, as well as for pregnant women seeking prophylaxis for vertical HIV transmission. WHO's new recommendations bring the guidelines closer to practices in developed countries, and its shift to earlier treatment alone will increase the number of treatment-eligible people by 50% or more.Scaling up access to HIV treatment is revealing important gaps in our understanding of how best to provide for all those in need. This knowledge gap is especially significant in developing countries, where women and children comprise a majority of those living with HIV infection. Given the magnitude and significance of these populations, the International AIDS Society, through its Industry Liaison Forum, prioritized HIV treatment and prophylaxis of women and children. In March 2010, the International AIDS Society and 15 partners launched a Consensus Statement outlining priority areas in which a relative lack of knowledge impedes delivery of optimal prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and treatment to women and children.The Consensus Statement, "Asking the Right Questions: Advancing an HIV Research Agenda for Women and Children", makes a special appeal for a more gender-sensitive approach to HIV research at all stages, from conception to design and implementation. It particularly emphasizes research to enhance the understanding of sex-based differences and paediatric needs in treatment uptake and response. In addition to clinical issues, the statement focuses on programmatic research that facilitates access and adherence to antiretroviral regimens. Better coordination of HIV management with sexual and reproductive healthcare delivery is one such approach.We discuss here our knowledge gaps concerning effective, safe PMTCT and treatment for women and children in light of the expansion envisioned by WHO's revised guidelines. The guideline's new goals present an opportunity for advancing the women and children's agenda outlined in the Consensus Statement.

Toxicogenomics of nevirapine-associated cutaneous and hepatic adverse events among populations of African, Asian, and European descent.

OBJECTIVE: Nevirapine is widely prescribed for HIV-1 infection. We characterized relationships between nevirapine-associated cutaneous and hepatic adverse events and genetic variants among HIV-infected adults. DESIGN: We retrospectively identified cases and controls. Cases experienced symptomatic nevirapine-associated severe (grade III/IV) cutaneous and/or hepatic adverse events within 8 weeks of initiating nevirapine. Controls did not experience adverse events during more than 18 weeks of nevirapine therapy. METHODS: Cases and controls were matched 1: 2 on baseline CD4 T-cell count, sex, and race. Individuals with 150 or less CD4 T cells/µl at baseline were excluded. We characterized 123 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and 2744 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and drug metabolism and transport genes. RESULTS: We studied 276 evaluable cases (175 cutaneous adverse events, 101 hepatic adverse events) and 587 controls. Cutaneous adverse events were associated with CYP2B6 516G→T (OR 1.66, all), HLA-Cw*04 (OR 2.51, all), and HLA-B*35 (OR 3.47, Asians; 5.65, Thais). Risk for cutaneous adverse events was particularly high among Blacks with CYP2B6 516TT and HLA-Cw*04 (OR 18.90) and Asians with HLA-B*35 and HLA-Cw*04 (OR 18.34). Hepatic adverse events were associated with HLA-DRB*01 (OR 3.02, Whites), but not CYP2B6 genotypes. Associations differed by population, at least in part reflecting allele frequencies. CONCLUSION: Among patients with at least 150 CD4 T cells/µl, polymorphisms in drug metabolism and immune response pathways were associated with greater likelihood of risk for nevirapine-related adverse events. Results suggest fundamentally different mechanisms of adverse events: cutaneous, most likely MHC class I-mediated, influenced by nevirapine CYP2B6 metabolism; hepatic, most likely MHC class II-mediated and unaffected by such metabolism. These risk variants are insensitive for routine clinical screening.