Association Between Markers of Vulnerability for Cannabis-Related Harms and Source of Supply: Secondary Analysis of a Representative Population Survey.

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the sale of non-medical cannabis was authorized in the province of Quebec in Canada, within a public monopoly under the Société Québécoise du Cannabis (SQDC). The objective of this study was to offer a description of the cannabis-using population regarding the sources of cannabis supply and to explore whether at-risk individuals are purchasing cannabis at SQDC. METHOD: We used data from a cross-sectional, representative population survey (age >18 years, n = 1799), the Enquête Québécoise sur le Cannabis, which was completed between February and June 2019. Analyses involved adjusted binary logistic regressions, incorporating population weights, to assess 7 potential indicators of harm. RESULTS: The vulnerability profiles of SQDC consumers (47.8%) and those acquiring their cannabis elsewhere (52.2%) were similar in terms of frequency of cannabis use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12-1.67), motivation to use (aOR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.16-2.46), concomitant consumption of other substances (aOR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.14-4.75), cannabis-impaired driving behaviours (aOR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.26-3.36), psychological distress (aOR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.26-3.79), and problematic cannabis use (aOR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.13-1.64). However, SQDC consumers were more likely to be aware of the cannabinoid content of the product purchased compared to those who acquired their cannabis from other sources (aOR = 4.12; 95% CI = 1.10-15.40). CONCLUSIONS: No association was detected between the source of cannabis supply and potential vulnerability indicators of cannabis-related harms, but SQDC consumers were more aware of the cannabinoid content of the products purchased. These results suggest that the regulated government supply in Quebec is reaching a substantial portion of those with potential high vulnerability to harm. Whether this knowledge translates into a reduction in the negative consequences related to consumption is still to be determined.

Geographical differences in the prevalence of chronic polypharmacy in older people: eleven years of the EPIFARM-Elderly Project.

PURPOSE: To compare the geographical differences in the prevalence of chronic polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people over 11 years. METHODS: This study analyzed nearly two million patients aged 65-94 years recorded in the Drug Administrative Database of the Lombardy Region (Northern Italy) from 2000 to 2010. Chronic polypharmacy was defined as taking five or more drugs in 1 month for at least 6 months (consecutive or not) in a year. RESULTS: There was a significant spatial autocorrelation that increased at the municipality level from 2000 (Moran's I Index = 0.26, z score = 16.91, p < 0.0001) to 2010 (Moran's I Index = 0.36, z score = 23.78, p < 0.0001). Clusters of high (Z(G) > 1.96) and low (Z(G) < -1.96) prevalence rates of chronic polypharmacy were found and were not influenced by age. Chronic polypharmacy weakly correlated with hospital admission (2000: ρ = 0.08, p = 0.0032; 2005: ρ = 0.11, p < 0.0001; 2010: ρ = 0.18, p < 0.0001), but not with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There were geographical differences in the prevalence of older people with chronic polypharmacy that were only partly explained by health indicators. Targeted activities on prescription practice to ensure that the prescribing of chronic polypharmacy is appropriate are required.