Association of the magnitude of the difference in blood pressure between office and ambulatory measurements with blood pressure variability in untreated individuals.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the magnitude of the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between office and ambulatory measurements (masked effect) in untreated individuals without apparent hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). METHODS: The inclusion criteria were 1) age ≥ 20 years, 2) blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg at the outpatient clinic, and 3) not receiving antihypertensive medications. The difference between office and ambulatory SBP was calculated by subtracting the ambulatory daytime SBP from the office SBP. The association between the masked effect and SBP variability was analyzed in individuals without HMOD (no electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio < 30 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 296). RESULTS: Among the cardiovascular risk factors, ambulatory BP variability was significantly correlated with the SBP difference. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (cv) of 24-h SBP exhibited a significant negative linear association with the SBP difference in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes, and 24-h ambulatory SBP. A significant association was observed in patients with ambulatory daytime hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, individuals with a negative SBP difference > -5 mmHg exhibited a higher SD and cv of 24-h SBP than those with a negative SBP difference ≤ -5 mmHg or a positive SBP difference. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the magnitude of the negative difference in office and ambulatory SBP may be a potential risk factor, even in individuals without apparent HMOD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03855605 ).

Controlled Level and Variability of Systolic Blood Pressure on the Risk of Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension.

Hypertension is an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the association between blood pressure (BP) control and thromboembolic events remains under-evaluated in patients with AF. We aimed to identify the relation between BP control and the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in hypertensive patients with AF. Data on 13,712 consecutive patients with AF (9,505 with and 4,207 without hypertension) were retrospectively analyzed. The hypertensive group was divided into quartiles according to the initial BP, linearly interpolated mean BP, variability independent of the mean of the BP, and time in therapeutic range (<130 mm Hg for systolic BP [SBP] and <80 mm Hg for diastolic BP) during follow-up. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. The mean follow-up duration of the study population was median 2.7 years (interquartile range 1.1 to 4.9 years), and the median number of BP measurements was 14 (interquartile range 6 to 25) times. Strictly controlled initial and interpolated mean BP and low variability in controlled BP (variability independent of the mean) were associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism for both SBP and diastolic BP. A similar risk was observed in patients with strictly controlled SBP (time in therapeutic range under 130 mm Hg >94%) and those without hypertension. In conclusion, continuous and strict maintenance of SBP under 130 mm Hg with low variability at outpatient clinic follow-up reduces the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with hypertension and AF.

Algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using out-of-office blood pressure measurements.

The authors developed and validated a diagnostic algorithm using the optimal upper and lower cut-off values of office and home BP at which ambulatory BP measurements need to be applied. Patients presenting with high BP (≥140/90 mm Hg) at the outpatient clinic were referred to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Office and home BP were divided into hypertension, intermediate (requiring diagnosis using ambulatory BP), and normotension zones. The upper and lower BP cut-off levels of intermediate zone were determined corresponding to a level of 95% specificity and 95% sensitivity for detecting daytime ambulatory hypertension by using the receiver operator characteristic curve. A diagnostic algorithm using three methods, OBP-ABP: office BP measurement and subsequent ambulatory BP measurements if office BP is intermediate zone; OBP-HBP-ABP: office BP, subsequent home BP measurement if office BP is within intermediate zone and subsequent ambulatory BP measurement if home BP is within intermediate zone; and HBP-ABP: home BP measurement and subsequent ambulatory BP measurements if home BP is within intermediate zone, were developed and validated. In the development population (n = 256), the developed algorithm yielded better diagnostic accuracies than 75.8% (95%CI 70.1-80.9) for office BP alone and 76.2% (95%CI 70.5-81.3) for home BP alone as follows: 96.5% (95%CI: 93.4-98.4) for OBP-ABP, 93.4% (95%CI: 89.6-96.1) for OBP-HBP-ABP, and 94.9% (95%CI: 91.5-97.3%) for HBP-ABP.  In the validation population (n = 399), the developed algorithm showed similarly improved diagnostic accuracy. The developed algorithm applying ambulatory BP measurement to the intermediate zone of office and home BP improves the diagnostic accuracy for hypertension.

Natural Course of New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Noncardiac Surgery.

Background Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after cardiac surgery, but little is known about its incidence and natural course after noncardiac surgery. We evaluated the natural course and clinical impact of POAF and the long-term impact of anticoagulation therapy in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing noncardiac surgery. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed the database of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) to identify patients who developed new-onset POAF after undergoing noncardiac surgery between January 2006 and January 2016. The main outcomes were AF recurrence, thromboembolic event, and major bleeding during follow-up. Of 322 688 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery, 315 patients (mean age, 66.4 years; 64.4% male) had new-onset POAF with regular rhythm monitoring after discharge. AF recurred in 53 (16.8%) during 2 years of follow-up. Hypertension (hazard ratio, 2.12; P=0.02), moderate-to-severe left atrial enlargement (hazard ratio, 2.33; P=0.007) were independently associated with recurrence. Patients with recurrent AF had higher risks of thromboembolic events (11.2% versus 0.8%; P<0.001) and major bleeding (26.9% versus 4.1%; P<0.001) than those without recurrence. Patients with recurrent AF and without anticoagulation were especially predisposed to thromboembolic events (P<0.001). Overall, anticoagulation therapy was not significantly associated with thromboembolic events (1.4% versus 2.5%, P=0.95). Conclusions AF recurred in 16.8% of patients with POAF after noncardiac surgery. AF recurrence was associated with higher risks of adverse clinical outcomes. Considering the high risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding, the benefits of routine anticoagulation should be carefully weighed in this population. Active surveillance for AF recurrence is warranted.

Esophageal Thermal Injury after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with High-Power (50 Watts) Radiofrequency Energy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data regarding the safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using high-power (50 W) radiofrequency (RF) energy in Asian populations are limited. This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence and pattern of esophageal injury after high-power AF ablation in an Asian cohort. METHODS: We searched the prospective AF ablation registry to identify patients who underwent AF ablation with 50 W RF energy using the smart touch surround flow catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Visitag™ (Biosense Webster) was used for lesion annotation with predefined settings of catheter stability (3 mm for 5 seconds) and minimum contact force (50% of time >5 g). All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 or 3 days after the ablation. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (mean age: 63±9 years, male: 69%, paroxysmal AF: 45.3%, persistent AF: 27.7%, long-standing persistent AF: 27.0%) were analyzed. Initially, 26 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation with 50 W for 5 seconds at each point. The remaining 133 patients underwent prolonged RF duration (anterior 10 seconds and posterior 6 seconds). The incidence rates of esophageal erythema/erosion and superficial ulceration were 1.3% for each type of the lesion. Food stasis, a suggestive finding of gastroparesis, was observed in 25 (15.7%) patients. There were no cases of cardiac tamponade, stroke, or death. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian patients, AF ablations using 50 W resulted in very low rates of mild esophageal complications.

Relation of Left Atrial Enlargement to Subsequent Thromboembolic Events in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Low to Borderline Embolic Risk.

The current thromboembolic risk stratification of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) does not include parameters from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We hypothesized that left atrial enlargement (LAE) on TTE could discriminate who require anticoagulation therapy among NVAF patients with low/borderline clinical embolic risk. This single-center cohort study included 6,602 patients with NVAF (median age, 56 years, 70.0% male) with a low to borderline clinical embolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score: 0 to 1 in males, 1 to 2 in females). LAE was classified as mild (≥41 mm in males; ≥39 mm in females) or moderate-severe (≥47 mm in males; ≥43 mm in females). The main study outcome was thromboembolic event (ischemic stroke and systemic embolism). Mild and moderate-severe LAE was diagnosed in 26.1% and 32.9% of the cohort, respectively. The patients with moderate-severe LAE showed a higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities and valvular heart disease and had a higher incidence of thromboembolic events than patients with mild or no LAE at 2 years of follow-up (2.5% vs 1.3% vs 1.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, patients with moderate-severe LAE were at a higher risk of thromboembolic event (hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.90; p < 0.001) compared to those with no LAE. This result persisted in a subgroup analysis of anticoagulant-naïve patients. The rate of thromboembolic events in patients with low clinical embolic risk and moderate-severe LAE was not different to those with high clinical embolic risk without LAE. In conclusion, Moderate-severe LAE on TTE was a significant predictor of thromboembolic events in NVAF patients at low/borderline clinical embolic risk.

Inter/Intra-Atrial Dissociation in Patients With Maze Procedure and Its Clinical Implications: Pseudo-Block and Pseudo-Ventricular Tachycardia.

Background Severe conduction delay and inter/intra-atrial dissociation may occur in patients who undergo an extensive catheter ablation or a maze procedure for atrial tachyarrhythmia. We report a series of patients with inter/intra-atrial dissociation that mimicked complete atrioventricular block or ventricular tachycardia. Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7 patients who were referred for the evaluation of atrioventricular block (patients 1-6) or ventricular tachycardia (patient 7) that occurred after biatrial maze procedure and valvular surgery. During the electrophysiologic study, slow atrial or junctional escape rhythm dissociated from isolated atrial activity mimicked complete atrioventricular blocks. Intra-atrial dissociation of the right atrium or left atrium was observed. Atrioventricular nodal conduction from the nondissociated atrium to the ventricle was preserved in all patients, while the conduction from the dissociated atrium was blocked. In patient 7, the pacing of the ventricle by tracking of atrial tachycardia from the nondissociated left atrium/coronary sinus mimicked ventricular tachycardia during pacemaker interrogation. A total of 5 patients received new permanent pacemaker implantations during the index hospitalization for the surgery (n=2) or as a deferred procedure (n=3) according to the treatment for sick sinus syndrome. Conclusions Pseudo-atrioventricular block or pseudo-ventricular tachycardia may occur because of inter/intra-atrial dissociation after a maze procedure. The selection of patients for permanent pacemaker implantation should be determined based on the patient's symptoms and the status of the escape pacemaker and not on the apparent atrioventricular block. Proper diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary implantation of a pacemaker or a defibrillator.

Association of pericardial effusion after pulmonary vein isolation and outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical implications of pericardial effusion (PE) after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are not well understood. We evaluated the association between newly developed PE after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal AF and arrhythmic recurrence. METHODS: From a prospective AF ablation registry, 184 patients (mean age 59 ± 10 years, 65% male) who underwent first-time PV isolation using a smart touch surround flow catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) were analyzed. Postablation transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed within 1-3 days after ablation, and the occurrence of PE was assessed. RESULTS: PE developed in 91 patients (49.5%), and most were of minimal severity (minimal, 93.4%; mild, 6.6%). Patients with PE had significantly lower body mass index and underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation more frequently. Early arrhythmic recurrence (EAR) (within 3 months) was observed in 28.8% of patients and was not different according to the PE development (PE [+]: 29.7% vs PE [-]: 28.0%; P = .80). During a median follow-up of 696 days, the cumulative rate of the late arrhythmic recurrence (LAR) (after 3 months) was 36.4%, and there was no difference between groups (PE [+]: 36.7% vs PE [-]: 35.1%; P = .988). The only predictor of LAR was EAR, and no echocardiographic parameters showed a significant correlation with LAR. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal or mild PE after PVI for paroxysmal AF is a frequent echocardiographic finding, and it had no significant association with AF recurrence. Routine TTE after AF ablation has no clinical implication.

Randomized comparison of new dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, prasugrel) and triple-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol) using P2Y12 point-of-care assay in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

BACKGROUND: Both new dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin and prasugrel) and triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol) are more potent than classic DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel). We compared the antiplatelet efficacy between new DAT and TAT in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary coronary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Forty patients who were eligible for primary PCI were prospectively randomized to DAT group (n=20) or TAT group (n=20) immediately after hospital arrival. The primary end point was P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) determined with the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care assay at the time of discharge. RESULTS: PRU value at discharge was significantly lower in patients receiving DAT compared with that of TAT (84.5 ± 44.7 vs. 128.4 ± 74.9, p=0.032). Percent platelet inhibition was significantly higher for DAT compared with TAT at discharge (72.1 ± 12.2 vs. 57.5 ± 23.5, p=0.020). Inter-patient variability of PRU values at discharge was significantly smaller in patient taking DAT compared with TAT (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: A new DAT is more potent antiplatelet therapy than TAT in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.