RESUMO
The aim of the study was to improve monitoring the treatment response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The IRB approved this prospective study. Ultrasound examinations were performed prior to treatment and 7 days after four consecutive NAC cycles. Residual malignant cell (RMC) measurement at surgery was the standard of reference. Alteration in B-mode ultrasound (tumor echogenicity and volume) and the Kullback-Leibler divergence (kld), as a quantitative measure of amplitude difference, were used. Correlations of these parameters with RMC were assessed and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed. Thirty-nine patients (mean age 57 y.) with 50 tumors were included. There was a significant correlation between RMC and changes in quantitative parameters (KLD) after the second, third and fourth course of NAC, and alteration in echogenicity after the third and fourth course. Multivariate analysis of the echogenicity and KLD after the third NAC course revealed a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 92%, PPV = 77%, NPV = 97%, accuracy = 91%, and AUC of 0.92 for non-responding tumors (RMC ≥ 70%). In conclusion, monitoring the echogenicity and KLD parameters made it possible to accurately predict the treatment response from the second course of NAC.
RESUMO
Aim: Numerous TIRADS (Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System) classifications have been developed, and various ultrasound (US) parameters are employed in different countries. The aim of our study was to introduce risk classification and management in a native population based on the Guidelines of Polish National Societies Diagnostics and Treatment of Thyroid Carcinoma but with the addition of sonoelastography. Materials and Methods: We examined prospectively 208 patients with 305 thyroid lesions employing B-mode ultrasound and sonoelastography (SE). Nodule composition, echogenicity, margins, shape, presence or absence of calcifications, thyroid capsule, nodule size were assessed using B-mode ultrasound. Moreover, sonoelastography results were presented using the Asteria scale. Results: In univariate analysis, the following US features were significantly associated with malignancy: >50% solid /solid component, marked hypoechogenicity, ill-defined margins, micro and macrocalcification, taller-than wide shape, no/partial halo pattern, infiltration of the capsule and an Asteria score of 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of B-mode features revealed that ill-defined margins (OR 10.77), markedly hypoechogenicity (OR 5.12), microcalcifications (OR 4.85), thyroid capsule infiltrations (OR 3.2), macrocalcifications (OR 3.01), and hard lesion in SE (OR 6.85) were associated with a higher Odds Ratio (OR) for malignancy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that combining two features increases the OR and the best combination was irregular margins and Asteria scale 4 (OR 20.21). Adding a third feature did not increase the OR. Conclusions: Sonoelastography increases the value risk of predicted malignancy, with consequent different approach to further clinical investigation and management. A solitary feature (Asteria 4) in a solid tumor can result in its categorization as TIRADS 4, but coexistence with high risk features allows it to be upgraded to TIRADS 5. The irregular margin was the strongest single feature which allowed for the assignment of a solid tumor into TIRADS 5 category. The highest accuracy was found by combining the features of age, margin, echogenicity (markedly hypoechoic), capsule infiltration, microcalcifications and sonoelastography (Asteria 3,4) of the tumors.