Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction: Is it better than open surgery?

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare the minimally invasive (MIS) chevron osteotomy to the well-established open chevron osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformity. METHODS: Two retrospective cohorts of patients treated with MIS or open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction, matched for age and gender with a minimum follow up of six months were reviewed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using pre and post-operative Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain and the Unified Elective Orthopaedic Score (UnEOS). Two independent, blinded examiners evaluated the radiographic correction of hallux valgus (HV) and intermetatarsal (IM) angle. RESULTS: A Total of 54 cases (27 per study group) with a mean follow-up of 25.9 months were included in the study. Pre-operatively, VAS (p = 0.76) and MOXFQ (p = 0.46) scores and HV angle (p = 0.1) were comparable in both groups. However, IM angle was significantly larger in the MIS group (p = 0.005). Post-operatively there was significant improvement in VAS and MOXFQ scores as well as significant correction of the HV and IM angles (p < 0.0001) for both groups. Comparing the two procedures, there was no significant difference between groups for VAS (p = 0.34), MOXFQ scores (p = 0.56) and HV angles (p = 0.069) but the MIS technique was significantly better in improving the IM angle (p = 0.016). The post-operative UnEOS score and the Satisfaction UnEOS domain reached excellent levels for the entire cohort with no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.2 and 0.28 respectively). CONCLUSION: Results show MIS chevron osteotomy provides better radiographic correction of the IM angle but functional outcomes for all parameters were comparable to the open technique. It can therefore be considered at least equivalent to standard open surgery when compared using validated Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

A deceptive presentation of Tuberculosis hip as Staphylococcal infection, its successful management and literature review.

A 71-year-old man presented with septic arthritis of the hip with an initial culture growth of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) masking the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). Based on joint aspirate culture and sensitivity results, the patient was first diagnosed with MSSA arthritis. He was started on intravenous antibiotics and underwent washout and debridement of hip. During the procedure, the surgeons observed characteristic tubercular changes and samples were sent for tubercular testing. The reports of cultures for acid-fast bacilli and synovial biopsies confirmed our intraoperative suspicion of TB. Antitubercular medication was started and it helped patient to improve quickly. He completed 9 months of tubercular treatment regimen and at completion total hip replacement was offered. At 8-year follow-up, the patient was doing fine with no recurrence of infection in his hip. High index of suspicion for skeletal TB was raised based on clinical and radiological signs especially if there was a delay or absence of response to appropriate therapy.

Total hip arthroplasty infection caused by an unusual organism, Salmonella; its successful management and literature review.

Prosthetic joint infection due to Salmonella spp is rare. Here we report an acute case of Salmonella enteritidis infection of a total hip arthroplasty in a man taking immunosuppressant medication. He was managed with antibiotics and two-stage revision surgery.