RESUMO
To the Editor, Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is a well-recognised clinical entity characterised by functionally significant impairment of drainage of urine at the level of the pelvi-ureteric junction due to extrinsic or intrinsic obstruction and is encountered both by adult and paediatric urologists alike. Management of PUJO has been surgical historically, and the gold standard has been an open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty [...].
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Ureter/cirurgia , Rim , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Ureter , Humanos , Criança , RimRESUMO
Duplication of the urethra is a rare congenital anomaly, usually found in children and adolescents. The authors present a rare case of urethral duplication, presenting in a 58-yr-old man, with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction.
Assuntos
Uretra/anormalidades , Uretra/cirurgia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
AIM: To present the results from one clinic's experience of using small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in augmentation urethroplasty for management of strictures of the bulbar urethra. METHODS: Urethral surgery was performed in nine men with strictures 4-6 cm. All of the patients were evaluated by history, physical examination, retrograde urethrogram, and uroflowmetry. Four layers of SIS were soaked in saline or Ringer's solution for 15 minutes at 37 degrees C, and the inner surface of the patch was gently fenestrated with a thin scalpel. The patch was spread-fixed onto the tunica albuginea. The mucosa was sutured to the submucosal graft first at 2-3 mm inwards from the SIS margins, then the spongiosum tissue was attached to the margins with interrupted absorbable sutures. RESULTS: Of the nine patients who underwent augmentation urethroplasty using SIS, only one had re-stricture at 6 months due to urethral infection. At 18 months after the surgery the uroflowmetry of the other eight patients was 20-21 mL/s. In terms of complications, six patients reported having post-micturition dribbling, and seven patients reported lack of morning erections for 35-69 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Using SIS is a safe procedure; however, long-term follow-up is needed to substantiate the good short-term results.
