A multicenter retrospective evaluation of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) therapy in Austria assessing the impact of early treatment response on patient outcomes in a real-life setting : R-EFECT study.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) showed that early response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment results in an improved long-term survival and progression-free survival. This study assessed whether patients achieving early treatment response (ETR; partial cytogenetic response or BCR-ABL1 mRNA ≤10% at 3 months) in daily practice also have a long-term survival benefit. METHODS: The Retrospective Evaluation of Early response in CML for long-term Treatment outcome (R-EFECT), a multicenter, retrospective chart review, documented patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP starting first-line TKI therapy in routine clinical practice. The primary aim was to assess the 5­year overall survival rate. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients from 12 centers across Austria (January 2004-May 2010), 176 (median age, 56 years) were included in the analysis. All patients received first-line therapy with imatinib. Overall, 136 patients (77.3%) achieved ETR (ETR+ group), whereas 40 (22.7%) did not reach ETR (ETR- group). The ETR+ group had higher 5­year overall survival (92.5% vs. 77.5%, P = 0.018) and progression-free survival (95.6% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.06) rates compared with the ETR- group. As expected, more patients in the ETR- group were switched to another TKI. At the last contact, 120 patients were still on imatinib and 44 had switched to another TKI (25 to nilotinib, 15 to dasatinib, and 4 to bosutinib). CONCLUSION: The data are in line with randomized trials demonstrating that ETR is associated with improved survival and thus confirmed these results in patients treated in daily clinical routine.

Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: Current Treatment Standards and Future Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The basis of improved systemic therapy for inoperable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is formed by HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies. Dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in combination with docetaxel in previously untreated patients, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, an antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] consisting of trastuzumab, a linker and a cytotoxic payload) after prior trastuzumab therapy have demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) superior to what was achieved with the previous treatment routine. Therefore, pertuzumab and trastuzumab with chemotherapy (preferably with a taxane) and T-DM1 are considered the current standard of care in the first- and second-line settings, respectively. For later lines of therapy, no uniformly recognized standard of care has been defined. Accepted options include treatment with trastuzumab beyond progression, in combination with a broad variety of single-agent chemotherapies used sequentially, or lapatinib (an HER2-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) in combination with either trastuzu-mab or capecitabine. However, most of these options have not been formally tested in patients receiving the current standard of care therapy for metastatic disease. SUMMARY: In patients previously treated with today's standard of care, including a significant subgroup with untreated or progressing brain metastases, the combination of tucatinib, a novel HER2-targeting TKI, with trastuzumab and capecitabine, demonstrates a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS when compared to placebo with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Neratinib, another HER2 TKI, in combination with capecitabine, compared to lapatinib and capecitabine, as well as margetuximab, an HER2-directed monoclonal antibody with a fragment c (Fc) domain engineered to enhance immune activation, compared to trastuzumab, both combined with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy, showed a statistically significantly longer PFS. However, not all patients in the respective trials had received pertuzumab and T-DM1 prior to enrollment and, so far, no improvement in OS has been demonstrated. After a median of 6 prior lines of therapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel ADC, showed a meaningful overall response and PFS. Although the safety profile was generally manageable, treatment-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) might pose a challenge in routine practice. Pyrotinib, another HER2 TKI, was evaluated in combination with capecitabine in patients after prior exposure to trastuzumab when pertuzumab and T-DM1 were not available. In this setting, PFS was better than with lapatinib and capecitabine. KEY MESSAGES: In 2020, pertuzumab and trastuzumab with taxane-based chemotherapy in the first line, and T-DM1 in the second line, remain the standard of care. Tucatinib, neratinib, margetuximab, and T-DXd expand the armamentarium for treatment beyond the second line. Pyrotinib might be another option, especially for patients, who do not have access to pertuzumab and T-DM1.