Intraoperative image-guidance during robotic surgery: is there clinical evidence of enhanced patient outcomes?

BACKGROUND: To date, the benefit of image guidance during robot-assisted surgery (IGS) is an object of debate. The current study aims to address the quality of the contemporary body of literature concerning IGS in robotic surgery throughout different surgical specialties. METHODS: A systematic review of all English-language articles on IGS, from January 2013 to March 2023, was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane library's Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Comparative studies that tested performance of IGS vs control were included for the quantitative synthesis, which addressed outcomes analyzed in at least three studies: operative time, length of stay, blood loss, surgical margins, complications, number of nodal retrievals, metastatic nodes, ischemia time, and renal function loss. Bias-corrected ratio of means (ROM) and bias-corrected odds ratio (OR) compared continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses according to guidance type (i.e., 3D virtual reality vs ultrasound vs near-infrared fluoresce) were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies, based on 11 surgical procedures of three specialties (general surgery, gynecology, urology), were included in the quantitative synthesis. IGS was associated with 12% reduction in length of stay (ROM 0.88; p = 0.03) and 13% reduction in blood loss (ROM 0.87; p = 0.03) but did not affect operative time (ROM 1.00; p = 0.9), or complications (OR 0.93; p = 0.4). IGS was associated with an estimated 44% increase in mean number of removed nodes (ROM 1.44; p < 0.001), and a significantly higher rate of metastatic nodal disease (OR 1.82; p < 0.001), as well as a significantly lower rate of positive surgical margins (OR 0.62; p < 0.001). In nephron sparing surgery, IGS significantly decreased renal function loss (ROM 0.37; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted surgery benefits from image guidance, especially in terms of pathologic outcomes, namely higher detection of metastatic nodes and lower surgical margins. Moreover, IGS enhances renal function preservation and lowers surgical blood loss.

Lateral meniscus allograft transplantation without bone plugs: technique and outcomes.

Once considered a non-fundamental structure, the menisci are now known to provide several functions within the knee, including protection of articular cartilage, load-bearing, shock absorption, joint stability, joint lubrification and joint congruity functions. Meniscal tears are one of the most common lesions in knee orthopedics, and partial or total meniscectomies are commonly performed procedures in orthopedic surgery. Despite meniscectomy is well recognized to lead improvement in clinical outcomes, it has been related to early onset knee osteoarthritis and joint degeneration which are associated with pain and functional limitations. Meniscal allograft transplantation has become a viable option for patients under 55 years old that have undergone total or near total meniscectomy and are in a painful state. This procedure can be performed using bone plugs or without bone plugs. In the bone plugs free technique allograft will be presented as a lateral meniscus with a portion of tibial plateau and is then introduced into the joint through an arthroscopic portal and fixed to the capsule with all-inside stitches. The most important aspect required to obtain good clinical results are graft size, anatomic placement and fixation, because extrusion is the most common complication related to meniscal transplantation. Although a lack of long-term follow-up (FU) studies, it has been demonstrated that lateral meniscus transplantation without bone plugs is a minimal invasive surgical procedure that improves the knee function, increases patient physical activity and reduces pain.

The reliability of adductor tubercle as an anatomical landmark for joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Joint line (JL) restoration is one of the major challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). There is debate regarding the most reliable methodology for the assessment of JL level during revision surgery. Among the strategies, the use of adductor tubercle (AT) as an anatomical landmark has been proposed. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the available literature to understand the reliability of AT ratio to identify the JL, and the advantages and drawbacks of its application. A research was performed on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases based on the following inclusion criteria for articles' selection: (I) clinical reports of any level of evidence, (II) written in the English language, (III) published from 2010 to 2020, (IV) dealing with the use of the adductor tubercle as a landmark to restore JL in revision TKA. All relevant data were extracted by two independent investigators, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus. A total of 13 studies were included: nine were radiographic evaluations, 3 clinical reports and 1 was an ex-vivo study. Radiographic studies highlighted that AT is a landmark easy to identify, with high intra and inter-observer agreement, irrespective of gender, age and size of the patient. The comparison with other bony landmarks revealed superior reliability in favor of AT. Also during surgical procedures, AT can be safely located and some clinical studies confirmed that AT ratio helps surgeon in re-establishing a correct JL and achieve ligament balancing even in complex revision cases. AT is a reliable and easily detectable landmark, and AT ratio is a valid tool to determine the JL level and help surgeons to restore the JL and simultaneously achieve knee ligament balancing in r-TKA.

High survivorship rate and good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up for lateral UKA: a systematic literature review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the available literature to understand the effectiveness, the survivorship, the clinical outcomes and the complications of lateral UKA. METHODS: A review of the current literature available about lateral UKA was performed in March 2020, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical reports of any level of evidence, (2) written in English language, (3) published from 1996 to 2020, (4) dealing with clinical data on lateral UKA. A total of 47 articles, published between 1996 and 2020, were included in the review. Quality of every article was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: A total of 47 studies were included. Mean mCMS was 45.27 (range 30-62). Mean age at surgery was 64.5 years (range 34.1-88.0 years). In 1741 patients (65.5%) a metal back implant was used and in 421 patients (15.8%) an all poly design was used. Several scores were used to evaluate clinical results (OKS, AKSS, IKS, KOOS, WOMAC, VAS). Range of motion improved with an overall mean value of 120.3° (range: 105.9°-143.3°). The mean follow-up was 60.7 months (range, 7-204 months), mean survivorship (absence of a revision) with a minimum 60 months of follow-up was 88.6% (range 74.5-100) and mean satisfaction of patients was 78.5% (range 41.0-97.9). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral UKA seems to be an effective solution to manage lateral osteoarthritis (OA), based on preliminary results, with survivorship and satisfaction rate comparable to medial UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Nonetheless, this review highlights that the quality of studies available in current literature is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of level IV studies.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: an expert opinion and proposal for a novel classification and coding system.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is able to modulate the joint environment by reducing the inflammatory distress and promoting tissue anabolism. Therefore, it has gained increasing popularity among clinicians in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), and it is currently proposed beside consolidated options such as viscosupplementation. AREAS COVERED: A systematic review of all available meta-analyses evaluating intra-articular PRP injections in patients affected by knee OA was performed, to understand how this biologic treatment approach compares to the traditional injective therapies available in clinical practice. Moreover, a novel coding system and 'minimum reporting requirements' are proposed to improve future research in this field and promote a better understanding of the mechanisms of action and indications. EXPERT OPINION: The main limitation in the current literature is the extreme variability of PRP products used, with often paucity or even lack of data on the biologic features of PRP, which should not be considered as a simple substance, but rather a 'procedure' requiring accurate reporting of the characteristics of the product but also all preparation and application modalities. This approach will aid in matching the optimal PRP product to specific patient factors, leading to improved outcomes and the elucidation of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment.