Verification of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Active Military Personnel During Treadmill Running.

ABSTRACT: Figueiredo, PS, Looney, DP, Pryor, JL, Doughty, EM, McClung, HL, Vangala, SV, Santee, WR, Beidleman, BA, and Potter, AW. Verification of maximal oxygen uptake in active military personnel during treadmill running. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1053-1058, 2022-It is unclear whether verification tests are required to confirm "true" maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max) in modern warfighter populations. Our study investigated the prevalence of V̇o2max attainment in U.S. Army soldiers performing a traditional incremental running test. In addition, we examined the utility of supramaximal verification testing as well as repeated trials for familiarization for accurate V̇o2max assessment. Sixteen U.S. Army soldiers (1 woman, 15 men; age, 21 ± 2 years; height, 1.73 ± 0.06 m; body mass, 71.6 ± 10.1 kg) completed 2 laboratory visits, each with an incremental running test (modified Astrand protocol) and a verification test (110% maximal incremental test speed) on a motorized treadmill. We evaluated V̇o2max attainment during incremental testing by testing for the definitive V̇O2 plateau using a linear least-squares regression approach. Peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak) was considered statistically equivalent between tests if the 90% confidence interval around the mean difference was within ±2.1 ml·kg-1·min-1. Oxygen uptake plateaus were identified in 14 of 16 volunteers for visit 1 (87.5%) and all 16 volunteers for visit 2 (100%). Peak oxygen uptake was not statistically equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V̇o2peak measures between the incremental test and verification test on visit 1 (2.3 ml·kg-1·min-1, [1.3-3.2]) or visit 2 (1.1 ml·kg-1·min-1 [0.2-2.1]). Interestingly, V̇o2peak was equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V̇o2peak measures between visits for the incremental tests (0.0 ml·kg-1·min-1 [-0.8 to 0.9]) but not the verification tests (-1.2 ml·kg-1·min-1 [-2.2 to -0.2]). Modern U.S. Army soldiers can attain V̇o2max by performing a modified Astrand treadmill running test. Additional familiarization and verification tests for confirming V̇o2max in healthy active military personnel may be unnecessary.

Effects of modern military backpack loads on walking speed and cardiometabolic responses of US Army Soldiers.

INTRODUCTION: Military leaders must understand how modern military equipment loads affect trade-offs between movement speed and physiological strain to optimize pacing strategies. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of load carried in a recently developed military backpack on the walking speed and cardiometabolic responses of dismounted warfighters. METHODS: Fifteen soldiers (1 woman, 14 men; age, 22 ± 2 years; height, 173 ± 7 cm; body mass (BM), 73 ± 10 kg) completed incremental walking tests with four external load conditions (0, 22, 44, or 66% BM) using the US Army's newest backpack: the Modular Lightweight Load-Carrying Equipment 4000 (MOLLE 4000). Oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and heart rate (HR) were evaluated relative to maximal values (V̇O2max and HRmax respectively). Testing ceased when participants completed the highest tested speed (1.97 m s-1), exceeded a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) of 1.00, or reached volitional exhaustion. RESULTS: Peak speed significantly decreased (p < 0.03) with successively heavier loads (0% BM, 1.95 ± 0.06 m s-1; 22% BM, 1.87 ± 0.10 m s-1; 44% BM, 1.69 ± 0.13 m s-1; 66% BM, 1.48 ± 0.13 m s-1). Peak V̇O2 was significantly lower (p < 0.01) with 0% BM (47 ± 5% V̇O2max) than each load (22% BM, 58 ± 8% V̇O2max; 44% BM, 63 ± 10% V̇O2max; 66% BM, 61 ± 11% V̇O2max). Peak HR was significantly lower (p < 0.01) with 0% BM (71 ± 5% HRmax) versus each load (22% BM, 83 ± 6% HRmax; 44% BM, 87 ± 6% HRmax; 66% BM, 88 ± 6% HRmax). CONCLUSION: Overburdened warfighters suffer severe impairments in walking speed even when carrying recently developed military load carriage equipment. Our results suggest that the relative work intensity of heavy load carriage may be better described when expressed relative to HRmax versus V̇O2max.

Formulae for calculating body surface area in modern U.S. Army Soldiers.

PURPOSE: Body surface area (BSA) is an important measurement for many thermophysiological, pharmaceutical, toxicological, environmental, and military applications. Unfortunately, BSA is difficult to quantify, and existing prediction methods are not optimized for contemporary populations. METHODS: The present study analyzed data body measurements from 5603 male and female participants of a US Army Anthropometric Survey to determine optimal methods for estimating BSA in modern US Army Soldiers. This data included 94 individual body measurements as well as three dimensional (3D) whole body scans for each participant. We used this data to assess and compared 15 existing equations to the measured data. We also derived best fitting nonlinear regression models for estimating BSA from different combinations of sex, height, and weight and iteratively included the remaining 91 measurements to determine which combinations resulted in the highest goodness-of-fit. RESULTS: We found that inclusion of armspan measurements as a third body dimension maximized the model goodness-of-fit. CONCLUSION: Some of the existing formulae provide reasonable estimates of 3D-scanner derived BSA; while our new formulae derived from this study allows for more accurate estimates of BSA using one or more common input variables.