Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 11(6): 874-880, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30524723

RESUMO

BACKGOUND: Fungal peritonitis (FP) is one of the most important causes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) failure, often burdened by increased morbility and mortality. This study evaluates the clinical course of FP cases that arose between 1983 and 2016 in a single PD unit. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of FP episodes recorded in the Baxter POET (Peritonitis Organism Exit sites Tunnel infections) registry and clinical records. FP incidence rate, PD and patients' survival and clinical characteristics of the study population were analysed, taking into account the evolution of clinical practice during the study period as a result of technical innovation, scientific evidence and guideline history. RESULTS: Fourteen FP cases (2.8%) were detected. The overall incidence of PD peritonitis was one episode/27 patient-months. Candida parapsilosis was the most frequently (50%) detected yeast. Seventy-five per cent of cases were considered secondary FP. This group experienced 2.6±1.7 bacterial peritonitis before FP, most frequently due to Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species. Most patients were treated with fluconazole for ≥8 days. All subjects were hospitalized for a median time of 25 days. Tenckhoff catheter removal occurred in all cases of FP and all patients were transferred to haemodialysis. Two patients died. From December 2010 to December 2016, no FP episodes were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: FP is confirmed as a significant cause of PD drop out and increases patients' mortality risk. Prompt diagnosis of FP, targeted antifugal therapy and rapid PD catheter removal are essential strategies for improved patient and PD survival.

2.
Perit Dial Int ; 36(6): 695-699, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27903856

RESUMO

A laparoscopic approach represents an effective alternative to open surgery in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). In these patients, conventional thinking provides for removal of the peritoneal catheter during left colon resections because of higher risk of patient contamination and peritonitis. The present paper describes 3 cases of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for colon cancer performed in PD patients without complications and without peritoneal catheter removal, leading to subsequent early PD resumption.Three normotype PD patients affected by early-stage sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma (T1-T2, M0, N0) underwent integrated surgical and nephrological management to reduce peritoneum stress, infective risk and postoperative complications. The day before surgery, patients were shifted to isovolumetric hemodialysis through tunneled central venous catheter. All patients underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy without Tenckhoff catheter removal. The postoperative period was uneventful, with concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis until the fifth day after surgery. Flushing of the PD catheter was performed twice a week postoperatively. Peritoneal dialysis was recovered 4 weeks after surgery in 2 cases with a well-maintained dialytic adequacy. One patient did not proceed to PD due to improvement of renal function after surgery.In selected PD patients, a minimally invasive surgical approach combined with careful nephrological management may represent a valid and safe strategy to treat early-stage colon cancer, avoiding PD drop-out.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Medição de Risco , Estudos de Amostragem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
G Ital Nefrol ; 33(3)2016.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27374389

RESUMO

The rate of fragile elderly patients affected by chronic kidney disease stage 5-5D is rapidly increasing. The decision making process regarding the start and the withdrawal of dialysis is often difficult for all those involved: patients, relatives, nephrologists and renal nurses. Therefore nephrologists and renal nurses are called to rapidly improve their theoretical and practical competence about the end-of-life care. The quality of clinical intervention and management requires a sound expertise in the ethical, legal, organizational and therapeutic aspects, not trivial nor even deductible from purely private and individual opinions nor from traditional medical practice. The present paper discusses the ethical and legal implications related to the start rather than to withdrawn from dialysis, preferring a non-dialysis medical treatment and / or palliative care. Operational aspects regarding the regional network of palliative care, the path of shared decision making process and a systematic approach to optimize medical and nursing interventions through the Liverpool Care Pathway program are discussed thereafter.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Tratamento Conservador , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos , Diálise Renal/ética , Uremia/etiologia , Uremia/terapia , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência
4.
G Ital Nefrol ; 33(2)2016.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067223

RESUMO

This study has been performed in the Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, in Desio Hospital, Italy. The aim of this study is to evaluate, starting from research questions, which information is given to patient in the pre-dialysis colloquia for his/her chosen dialysis methods. Moreover, the study evaluated feelings, emotions and fears since the announcement of the necessity of dialysis treatment. The objective of the study was reached through the interview with patients on dialysis. The fact-finding survey was based on the tools of social research, as the semi-structured interview. Instead of using the questionnaire, even though it make it easier to collect larger set of data, the Authors decided to interview patients in person, since the interview allows direct patient contact and to build a relationship of trust with the interviewer, in order to allow patient explain better his/her feeling.


Assuntos
Emoções , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Medo/psicologia , Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 18(11): 2391-8, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14551372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) one of the most important factors that influence the efficiency of the treatment is the total volume of dialysate infused per session and the dwell time. This study is aimed at examining the relationships between i.p. pressure (IPP), dialysate flow characteristics, and different dialysate fill volumes in order to optimize APD. METHODS: We studied 20 patients who received APD, with the standard fill volume (2 l, A), or individualized fill volumes based on the patient's body surface area (2.5 l/BSA/1.73 m, B) or on body weight (40 ml/kg body weight, C). The patient's tolerance to a given fill volume was evaluated by measuring IPP, and catheter flow characteristics were evaluated by an automated machine. RESULTS: IPP increased with the increase of the infused volume of dialysate (P < 0.05) and tended towards a positive relationship with the patient's body mass index (BMI: A vs IPP: R = 0.39, P = 0.0019; B vs IPP: R = 0.66, P = 0.0012; C vs IPP R = 0.55, P = 0.009). We also found a relationship between fill volume, BMI and IPP: IPP = 1.0839 + 0.53 (beta) x BMI + 0.211 (beta) x fill volume (R = 0.65; r(2) = 0.40 P < 0.01). The mean IPP with different dialysate fill volumes tended to be related to the volume of dialysate drained at the transition point (R = 0.37; P < 0.05). The pre-transition flow rate/mean IPP ratio tended towards a positive relationship with the volume of dialysate drained at the transition point (R = 0.35, P < 0.05), the transition time (R = 0.34; P < 0.05) and a negative one with the transition volume (R = -0.35, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is possible to customize APD, where the tidal percentage coincides with the transition point for a given catheter and a specific initial dialysate fill volume, the tolerance of which can be measured by assessing IPP.


Assuntos
Soluções para Diálise/administração & dosagem , Pressão Hidrostática , Cavidade Peritoneal , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Idoso , Superfície Corporal , Peso Corporal , Cateteres de Demora , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA