RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrences or persistent symptoms after an initial episode of diverticulitis are common, yet surgical treatment is rarely performed. Current guidelines lack clear recommendations on whether or not to operate, even though recent studies suggest an improved quality of life following surgery. The aim of this study is therefore to compare quality of life in patients with recurrent or ongoing diverticulitis treated conservatively versus surgically, giving a more definitive answer to the question of whether or not to operate on these patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane. Only comparative studies reporting on quality of life were included. Statistical analysis included calculation of weighted mean differences and pooled odds ratios. RESULTS: Five studies were included; two RCT's and three retrospective observational studies. Compared to conservative treatment, the SF-36 scores were higher in the surgically treated group at each follow-up moment but only the difference in SF-36 physical scores at six months follow-up was statistically significant (MD 6.02, 95%CI 2.62-9.42). GIQLI scores were also higher in the surgical group with a MD of 14.01 (95%CI 8.15-19.87) at six months follow-up and 7.42 (95%CI 1.23-12.85) at last available follow-up. Also, at last available follow-up, significantly fewer recurrences occurred in the surgery group (OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.05-0.23, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although surgery for recurrent diverticulitis is not without risk, it might improve long-term quality of life in patients suffering from recurrent- or ongoing diverticulitis when compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, it should be considered in this patient group.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Humanos , Tratamento Conservador , Diverticulite/cirurgia , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fibroadenomas are the most common benign breast lesions in women. They present as a unilateral mass and can rapidly enlarge in size through hormonal changes. Fibroadenomas could be classified as small or giant, and as simple or complex. They are classified as 'giant' when the size exceeds 5 cm and/or weight 500 gram; and as 'complex' if one of the following characteristics is present: cysts with a size >3 mm, epithelial calcifications, sclerosing adenosis and papillary apocrine metaplasia. Giant fibroadenomas can cause compression of surrounding breast tissue or breast asymmetry, requiring surgical excision in order to preserve a normal breast shape. CASE: A 26-year-old pregnant woman was referred with a palpable mass of her right breast. The mass rapidly increased in size to a diameter of 13 cm during the second trimester of her pregnancy. A tru-cut biopsy confirmed a fibroadenoma. The rapid growth and compression of normal breast tissues indicated a lumpectomy during her pregnancy. The mass was easily excised without any consequences for the pregnancy. Pathological examination showed a complex giant fibroadenoma. CONCLUSION: A unique case of a pregnant woman with rapid progression of a fibroadenoma that met the criteria of a complex and giant fibroadenoma, was presented. This case emphasizes the importance of timely surgical intervention, even during pregnancy, to prevent permanent breast tissue damage.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Fibroadenoma , Doença da Mama Fibrocística , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Gestantes , Fibroadenoma/diagnóstico , Fibroadenoma/cirurgia , Fibroadenoma/patologia , Mama/patologia , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/diagnóstico , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/cirurgia , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/patologiaRESUMO
Background: Updating evidence-based clinical practice guidelines is an onerous process and there is a call for more efficient determination of key questions that need updating. Especially for surgical techniques it is unclear if new evidence will result in substantial changes after wide implementation and if continuous updating is always necessary. Objectives: This study analyses the impact of updating a surgical guideline and proposes suggestions for optimising this process. Materials and methods: The Dutch Minimally Invasive Surgery guideline was developed in 2011 and updated in 2021. For both versions a multidisciplinary guideline working group (GDG) was created, that determined key questions. Changes in conclusions and recommendations were analysed by the GDG and statements for expected change of recommendations in the future were made. Results: 15 key questions were formed, of which 12 were updates of the previous guideline. For only 27% of the updated key questions, the conclusions changed. In ten years, the body grew only marginally for most key questions and quality of the evidence did not improve substantially for almost all key questions. However, in this first update of the MIC guideline, many recommendations did change due to a more robust interpretation of the conclusions by the GDG. Based on analysis of this updating process, the GDG expects that only four out of 15 recommendations may change in the future. Conclusion: We propose an additional step at the end of guideline development and updating, where the necessity for updating in the future is determined for each key question by the GDG, using their valuable knowledge gained from developing or updating the guideline. For surgical guidelines, the authors suggest updating key issues if it includes a relatively newly introduced surgical- or adapted technique or a new patient group. Low quality or small body of evidence should not be a reason in itself for updating, as this mostly does not lead to new evidence-based conclusions. This new step is expected to result in a more efficient prioritising of key questions that need updating. What's new?: By adding one additional step at the end of the updating process, the future updating process could become more efficient.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although the genus Prevotella is part of the general human microbiota, species of this anaerobic gram-negative bacterium have been described as causes of persisting nonpuerperal breast abscesses. Collecting punctate samples and testing these samples for anaerobic bacteria is not part of the common diagnostic workflow in atypical breast abscesses. The causative anaerobic micro-organism can remain unclear and patients can be treated with multiple inadequate antibiotics and/or extensive surgical procedures. The aim of this cohort study of Prevotella induced breast abscesses is to gain more insights into the diagnostic procedures and treatment. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with a Prevotella induced breast abscess between 2015 and 2021, were retrospectively reviewed on patient characteristics, diagnostic procedures, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. Six subspecies of Prevotella were determined by culturing. High susceptibility was observed for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (100%, n = 12). Nine patients (43%) were treated with antibiotics, eight patients (38%) with antibiotics and incision and drainage, and four patients (19%) with only incision and drainage. Recurrence was observed in nine patients (43%), of whom five patients were treated with antibiotics and three patients had surgery. The mean duration of antibiotic administration in patients with recurrence was significantly shorter compared to those without recurrence (5.6 days vs. 19.5 days, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Specific anaerobic culturing should be common practice in atypical breast abscesses to confirm Prevotella species. The high recurrence rate emphasizes the need of further research for optimal treatment. Prolonged duration of antibiotics could be considered and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid seems to be the first choice.
Assuntos
Empiema Pleural , Mastite , Feminino , Humanos , Abscesso/diagnóstico , Abscesso/tratamento farmacológico , Abscesso/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevotella , Estudos de Coortes , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Empiema Pleural/tratamento farmacológico , Drenagem/métodos , Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Ácido ClavulânicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment of gastric cancer. Extent of lymphadenectomy may differ depending on T-stage, as the rate of lymph node metastases may differ. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate and compare the prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages. METHODS: Data reporting and structure of this systematic review follows the PRISMA checklist. The Medline and PubMed databases were systematically searched. The search included the following Mesh terms: "Stomach Neoplasms", "Lymphatic Metastasis" and "Lymph Node Excision". The primary outcome was the highest prevalence of nodal metastases per T-stage. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 175 eligible articles. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and were accordingly analyzed. Concerning the lymph node stations 1 to 7, the lymph nodes along the lesser gastric curvature (station 3) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 5.5%, T2: 21.9%, T3: 41.9%, T4: 71.0%). Concerning the lymph node stations 8 to 20, the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (station 8) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 0.8%, T2: 7.9%, T3: 14.0%, T4: 28.2%). CONCLUSION: An overall low prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas endorse a more tailored approach based on the different gastric T-stages. In addition, a less extensive lymphadenectomy seems justified in early T1 carcinoma. SYNOPSIS: This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of nodal metastases for the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages, showing an overall low prevalence in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in the more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas.
Assuntos
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Prevalência , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Carcinoma/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Robotic camera steering systems have been developed to facilitate endoscopic surgery. In this study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare conventional human camera control with the AutoLap™ robotic camera holder in terms of efficiency and user experience when performing routine laparoscopic procedures. Novelty of this system relates to the steering method, which is image based. METHODS: Patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic hemicolectomy, sigmoid resection, fundoplication and cholecystectomy between September 2016 and January 2018 were included. Stratified block randomization was used for group allocation. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of robotic and human camera control, measured with surgical team size and total operating time. Secondary outcome parameters were number of cleaning moments of the laparoscope and the post-study system usability questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were randomized to have robotic (50) versus human (50) camera control. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. In the robotic group, 49/50 (98%) of procedures were carried out without human camera control, reducing the surgical team size from four to three individuals. The median total operative time (60.0 versus 53.0 min, robotic vs. control) was not significantly different, p = 0.122. The questionnaire showed a positive user satisfaction and easy control of the robotic camera holder. CONCLUSION: Image-based robotic camera control can reduce surgical team size and does not result in significant difference in operative time compared to human camera control. Moreover, robotic image-guided camera control was associated with positive user experience.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Colectomia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Robótica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Based on excellent outcomes from high-volume centres, laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being adopted into nationwide practice which typically includes low-medium volume centres. It is unknown how the use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compare between high-volume centres and low-medium volume centres. This study aimed to compare use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection in three leading European high-volume centres and nationwide practice in the Netherlands. METHOD: An international, retrospective multicentre cohort study including data from three European high-volume centres (Oslo, Southampton and Milan) and all 20 centres in the Netherlands performing laparoscopic liver resection (low-medium volume practice) from January 2011 to December 2016. A high-volume centre is defined as a centre performing >50 laparoscopic liver resections per year. Patients were retrospectively stratified into low, moderate- and high-risk Southampton difficulty score groups. RESULTS: A total of 2425 patients were included (1540 high-volume; 885 low-medium volume). The median annual proportion of laparoscopic liver resection was 42.9 per cent in high-volume centres and 7.2 per cent in low-medium volume centres. Patients in the high-volume centres had a lower conversion rate (7.4 versus 13.1 per cent; P < 0.001) with less intraoperative incidents (9.3 versus 14.6 per cent; P = 0.002) as compared to low-medium volume centres. Whereas postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, a lower reintervention rate (5.1 versus 7.2 per cent; P = 0.034) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 versus 5 days; P < 0.001) were observed in the high-volume centres as compared to the low-medium volume centres. In each Southampton difficulty score group, the conversion rate was lower and hospital stay shorter in high-volume centres. The rate of intraoperative incidents did not differ in the low-risk group, whilst in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups this rate was lower in high-volume centres (absolute difference 6.7 and 14.2 per cent; all P < 0.004). CONCLUSION: High-volume expert centres had a sixfold higher use of laparoscopic liver resection, less conversions, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to a nationwide low-medium volume practice. Stratification into Southampton difficulty score risk groups identified some differences but largely outcomes appeared better for high-volume centres in each risk group.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Hepatectomia/métodos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Routine colonoscopy was traditionally recommended after acute diverticulitis to exclude coexistent malignancy. Improved CT imaging may make routine colonoscopy less required over time but most guidelines still recommend it. The aim of this review was to assess the role of colonoscopy in patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies reporting the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) or colorectal carcinoma in patients who underwent colonoscopy within 1 year after CT-proven left-sided acute diverticulitis. The prevalence was pooled using a random-effects model and, if possible, compared with that among asymptomatic controls. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 3296 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of ACN was 6·9 (95 per cent c.i. 5·0 to 9·4) per cent and that of colorectal carcinoma was 2·1 (1·5 to 3·1) per cent. Only two studies reported a comparison with asymptomatic controls, showing comparable risks (risk ratio 1·80, 95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 4·96). In subgroup analysis of patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, the prevalence of colorectal carcinoma was only 0·5 (0·2 to 1·2) per cent. CONCLUSION: Routine colonoscopy may be omitted in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis if CT imaging is otherwise clear. Patients with complicated disease or ongoing symptoms should undergo colonoscopy.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Diverticulite/terapia , Doença Aguda , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Diverticulite/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Prevalência , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radical gastrectomy is the cornerstone of the treatment of gastric cancer. For tumors invading the pancreas, en-bloc partial pancreatectomy may be needed for a radical resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of gastrectomies with partial pancreatectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with or without partial pancreatectomy for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA). Outcomes were resection margin (pR0) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III postoperative complications and survival. The association between partial pancreatectomy and postoperative complications was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival of patients with partial pancreatectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 1966 patients that underwent gastrectomy, 55 patients (2.8%) underwent en-bloc partial pancreatectomy. A pR0 resection was achieved in 45 of 55 patients (82% versus 85% in the group without additional resection, P = 0.82). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications occurred in 21 of 55 patients (38% versus 17%, P < 0.001). Median overall survival [95% confidence interval] was 15 [6.8-23.2] months. For patients with and without perioperative systemic therapy, median survival was 20 [12.3-27.7] and 10 [5.7-14.3] months, and for patients with pR0 and pR1 resection, it was 20 [11.8-28.3] and 5 [2.4-7.6] months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrectomy with partial pancreatectomy is not only associated with a pR0 resection rate of 82% but also with increased postoperative morbidity. It should only be performed if a pR0 resection is feasible.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos , Pâncreas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently published studies advocate a conservative approach with observation and antibiotic treatment in diverticulitis patients with pericolic air on computed tomography (CT). The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical course of initially conservatively treated diverticulitis patients with isolated pericolic air and to identify risk factors for conservative treatment failure. The secondary aim was to assess the outcome of non-antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Patient data from a retrospective cohort study on risk factors for complicated diverticulitis were combined with data from the DIABOLO trial, a randomised controlled trial comparing non-antibiotic with antibiotic treatment in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. The present study identified all patients with Hinchey 1A diverticulitis with isolated pericolic air on CT. Pericolic air was defined as air located < 5 cm from the affected segment of colon. The primary outcome was failure of conservative management which was defined as need for percutaneous abscess drainage or emergency surgery within 30 days after presentation. A multivariable logistic regression of clinical, radiological and laboratorial parameters with respect to treatment failure was performed. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study. Fifty-two (48%) patients were treated with antibiotics. Nine (8%) patients failed conservative management, seven (13%) in the antibiotic treatment group and two (4%) in the non-antibiotic group (p = 0.083). Only (increased) CRP level at presentation was an independent predictor for treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment in diverticulitis patients with isolated pericolic air is a suitable treatment strategy. Moreover, non-antibiotic treatment might be reasonable in selected patients.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Drenagem/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 447 patients with Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses, who were treated with antibiotics, with or without percutaneous drainage. Abscesses of 3 and 5 cm in size were at higher risk of short-term treatment failure and emergency surgery respectively. Initial non-surgical treatment of Hinchey Ib and II diverticular abscesses was comparable between patients treated with antibiotics only and those who underwent percutaneous drainage in combination with antibiotics, with regard to short- and long-term outcomes. Most do not need drainage.
Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Abscesso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Doença Diverticular do Colo/diagnóstico , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The results of the DIRECT trial, an RCT comparing conservative management with elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurrent diverticulitis or persistent complaints, showed that elective sigmoid resection leads to higher quality of life. The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment at 1- and 5-year follow-up from a societal perspective. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DIRECT trial. The actual resource use and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L™ score) were documented prospectively per individual patient and analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle for up to 5 years after randomization. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: The study included 106 patients, of whom 50 were randomized to surgery and 56 to conservative treatment. At 1- and 5-year follow-up an incremental effect (QALY difference between groups) of 0·06 and 0·43 respectively was found, and an incremental cost (cost difference between groups) of 6957 and 2674 respectively, where surgery was more expensive than conservative treatment. This resulted in an ICER of 123 365 per additional QALY at 1-year follow-up, and 6275 at 5 years. At a threshold of 20 000 per QALY, operative treatment has 0 per cent probability of being cost-effective at 1-year follow-up, but a 95 per cent probability at 5 years. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurring diverticulitis or persistent complaints was found to be cost-effective. Registration number: NTR1478 (www.trialregistrer.nl).
Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Colectomia/economia , Colo Sigmoide/patologia , Tratamento Conservador/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Doença Diverticular do Colo/diagnóstico , Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stoma reversal is often considered a straightforward procedure with low short-term complication rates. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of incisional hernia following stoma reversal and identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: This was an observational study of consecutive patients who underwent stoma reversal between 2009 and 2015 at a teaching hospital. Patients followed for at least 12 months were eligible. The primary outcome was the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. Independent risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24 (range 12-89) months, 110 of 318 included patients (34·6 per cent) developed an incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In 85 (77·3 per cent) the hernia was symptomatic, and 72 patients (65·5 per cent) underwent surgical correction. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR) 1·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·21), stoma prolapse (OR 3·27, 1·04 to 10·27), parastomal hernia (OR 5·08, 1·30 to 19·85) and hypertension (OR 2·52, 1·14 to 5·54) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In addition, the risk of incisional hernia was greater in patients with underlying malignant disease who had undergone a colostomy than in those who had had an ileostomy (OR 5·05, 2·28 to 11·23). CONCLUSION: Incisional hernia of the previous stoma site was common and frequently required surgical correction. Higher BMI, reversal of colostomy in patients with an underlying malignancy, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia and hypertension were identified as independent risk factors.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Conservative treatment strategy without antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis (UD) has proven to be safe. The aim of the current study is to assess the clinical course of UD patients who were initially treated without antibiotics and to identify risk factors for treatment failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients with a CT-proven episode of UD (defined as modified Hinchey 1A). Only non-immunocompromised patients who presented without signs of sepsis were included. Patients that received antibiotics within 24 h after or 2 weeks prior to presentation were excluded from analysis. Patient characteristics, clinical signs, and laboratory parameters were collected. Treatment failure was defined as (re)admittance, mortality, complications (perforation, abscess, colonic obstruction, urinary tract infection, pneumonia) or need for antibiotics, operative intervention, or percutaneous abscess drainage within 30 days after initial presentation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to quantify which variables are independently related to treatment failure. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and January 2017, 751 patients presented at the emergency department with a CT-proven UD. Of these, 186 (25%) patients were excluded from analysis because of antibiotic treatment. A total of 565 patients with UD were included. Forty-six (8%) patients experienced treatment failure. In the multivariable analysis, a high CRP level (> 170 mg/L) was a significant predictive factor for treatment failure. CONCLUSION: UD patients with a CRP level > 170 mg/L are at higher risk for non-antibiotic treatment failure. Clinical physicians should take this finding in consideration when selecting patients for non-antibiotic treatment.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Diverticulite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The shift from routine antibiotics towards omitting antibiotics for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis opens up the possibility for outpatient instead of inpatient treatment, potentially reducing the burden of one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the Western world. PURPOSE: Assessing the safety and cost savings of outpatient treatment in acute colonic diverticulitis. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies on outpatient treatment of colonic diverticulitis, confirmed with computed tomography or ultrasound. Outcomes were readmission rate, need for emergency surgery or percutaneous abscess drainage, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies with 2303 outpatient treated patients were included. These studies predominantly excluded patients with comorbidity or immunosuppression, inability to tolerate oral intake, or lack of an adequate social network. The pooled incidence rate of readmission for outpatient treatment was 7% (95%CI 6-9%, I2 48%). Only 0.2% (2/1288) of patients underwent emergency surgery, and 0.2% (2/1082) of patients underwent percutaneous abscess drainage. Only two studies compared readmission rates outpatients that had similar characteristics as a control group of inpatients; 4.5% (3/66) and 6.3% (2/32) readmissions in outpatient groups versus 6.1% (4/66) and 0.0% (0/44) readmissions in inpatient groups (p = 0.619 and p = 0.174, respectively). Average healthcare cost savings for outpatient compared with inpatient treatment ranged between 42 and 82%. CONCLUSION: Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis resulted in low readmission rates and very low rates of complications. Furthermore, healthcare cost savings were substantial. Therefore, outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis seems to be a safe option for most patients.
Assuntos
Diverticulite/terapia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Abscesso/terapia , Doença Aguda , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Diverticulite/economia , Diverticulite/cirurgia , Drenagem , Emergências , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Readmissão do PacienteRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to identify risk factors that can predict complicated diverticulitis. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is a self-limiting and mild disease, but 10% of patients with diverticulitis develop complications requiring further treatment. It is important to estimate the risk of developing complicated diverticulitis at an early stage to set the right treatment at initial presentation. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting on risk factors for complicated diverticulitis. Complicated diverticulitis was defined as Hinchey ≥Ib or severe diverticulitis according to the Ambrosetti criteria. Meta-analyses were performed when at least four studies reported on the outcome of interest. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included with a total of 4619 patients. Most were of reasonable quality. Only the risk factors "age" and "sex" were eligible for meta-analysis, but none showed a significant effect on the risk for complicated diverticulitis. There was reasonable quality of evidence suggesting that high C-reactive protein; white blood cell count; clinical signs including generalized abdominal pain, constipation and vomiting; steroid usage; a primary episode; and comorbidity are risk factors for complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Although high-level evidence is lacking, this study identified several risk factors associated with complicated diverticulitis. Individually, these risk factors have little value in predicting the course of diverticulitis. The authors propose a prognostic model combining these risk factors which might be the next step to aid the physician in predicting the course of diverticulitis and setting the right treatment at initial presentation.
Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Temperatura Corporal , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Comorbidade , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Doença Diverticular do Colo/sangue , Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Vômito/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is usually the first procedure performed when starting the learning process for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis in comparison to sigmoid malignancy in order to assess its role in the residents training program. METHODS: A cohort of patients was selected who suffered either from malignancy or recurrent diverticulitis in the sigmoid colon. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection was performed. The degree of difficulty was assessed by intraoperative complications and intraoperative technical challenges. Furthermore, take-overs from assistant to surgeon, surgeon to surgeon, and conversion were reported. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were included, 119 (53.1%) men and 105 (46.9%) women. Patients suffering from diverticulitis had significantly less co-morbidities than those with malignancies. In the diverticulitis group, there were significantly more technical challenges. There was a higher rate in take-overs from residents (p = 0.02) as well as surgeon to surgeon (p = 0.04). The rate of conversions was also significantly higher in the diverticulitis group (p = 0.03) when compared to the malignancy group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of our study show that diverticulitis may not be the ideal condition to start the learning process for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Assuntos
Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
AIM: The optimal diet for uncomplicated diverticulitis is unclear. Guidelines refrain from recommendation due to lack of objective information. The aim of the study was to determine whether an unrestricted diet during a first acute episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was performed of patients diagnosed with diverticulitis for the first time between 2012 and 2014. Requirements for inclusion were radiologically proven modified Hinchey Ia/b diverticulitis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III and the ability to tolerate an unrestricted diet. Exclusion criteria were the use of antibiotics and suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy. All included patients were advised to take an unrestricted diet. The primary outcome parameter was morbidity. Secondary outcome measures were the development of recurrence and ongoing symptoms. RESULTS: There were 86 patients including 37 (43.0%) men. All patients were confirmed to have taken an unrestricted diet. There were nine adverse events in seven patients. These consisted of readmission for pain (five), recurrent diverticulitis (one) and surgery (three) for ongoing symptoms (two) and Hinchey Stage III (one). Seventeen (19.8%) patients experienced continuing symptoms 6 months after the initial episode and 4 (4.7%) experienced recurrent diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of complications among patients taking an unrestricted diet during an initial acute uncomplicated episode of diverticulitis was in line with that reported in the literature.
Assuntos
Dieta/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/dietoterapia , Diverticulite/dietoterapia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed procedures. An alternative to mesh repair could be herniotomy, where no mesh is placed and only minimal dissection is done. The European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients, which were released in 2009 and expired some time ago, states that all adult (>30 years of age) male patients with a symptomatic inguinal hernia should be operated on using a mesh technique. We hypothesize that the herniotomy is a good alternative to mesh repair in young patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the postoperative complications and recurrence rate after a herniotomy procedure were studied. All patients between the ages of 18 and 40 at the time of the surgery were included from January 1st 1997 until December 31st 2010. RESULTS: In our cohort of 234 patients, the recurrence rate was 4.7 %. When we focus on the patients in the ages ranging from 18 to 25 years old at the time of the surgery, we found a recurrence rate of 0 versus 9.2 % in ages 26-40. These recurrence rates are comparable to those in current literature. CONCLUSION: A herniotomy seems to be an efficient procedure with acceptable recurrence rates in patients up to 30 years of age. Postoperative pain seems to be low compared to other techniques. In patients older than 30 years recurrence rates seem to increase which necessitates the use of mesh implants. The main finding is zero recurrences in patients up to 25 years of age. Because there is a limited amount of similar studies that evaluated the complications of a herniotomy, we believe these results warrant the commencement of a randomized controlled trial to add more evidence to this topic. This cohort study is a small, but important contribution to the advice to perform a randomized controlled trial. Based on the limited evidence that is known so far, this procedure might be the treatment of choice in the repair of primary inguinal hernia in young adult patients up to 30 years of age.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe patients developing grade III and IV hemorrhoids requiring surgery after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and to explore the relationship between developing such hemorrhoids and recurrence of rectal prolapse after LVMR. METHODS: All consecutive patients receiving LVMR at the Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands, between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for recurrences. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients underwent LVMR. Sixty-five of these patients (actuarial 5-year incidence 24.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 18.6-30.0) developed symptomatic grade III/IV hemorrhoids requiring stapled or excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Re-do surgery for recurrent grade III/IV hemorrhoids was required for 15 of the 65 patients (actuarial 5-year recurrence rate 40.6, 95 % CI 23.2-58.0) after the primary hemorrhoidectomy. Three of the 65 patients developed an external rectal prolapse (ERP) recurrence and eight an internal rectal prolapse (IRP) recurrence. This generated a 5-year recurrence rate of 25.3 % (95 % CI 0-53.9) for ERP recurrence and 24.4 % (95 % CI 9.1-39.7) for IRP recurrence. The rest of the LVMR cohort not receiving additional surgery for hemorrhoids (n = 355) showed significantly lower actuarial 5-year ERP (0.8 %, p = 0.011) and IRP (11 %, p = 0.020) recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: High-grade hemorrhoids requiring surgery may be common after LVMR. The development of high-grade hemorrhoids after LVMR might be considered a predictor of rectal prolapse recurrence.