Pregnancy-associated desmoid fibromatosis: A Dutch multi-centre retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The development of desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is associated with pregnancy. The current treatment consensus recommends active surveillance (AS). However, data in pregnancy-associated DF is scarce and it is uncertain whether AS is the best management strategy for this DF-subgroup. The aim of this study was to describe demographic, tumor, obstetric, treatment characteristics and treatment outcome in pregnancy-associated DF. METHODS: Female DF patients who were 18-50 years old at time of diagnosis (2000-2020) and had a history (≤5 years) of pregnancy at time of diagnosis were included. RESULTS: Overall, 62 patients were included. The most common locations were abdominal wall (74%), pelvis (10%) and extremities (10%). Mutational analysis was conducted in 31 patients of which 94% had CTNNB1-mutations. Ten patients (16%) were diagnosed during pregnancy, while the remainder were diagnosed after pregnancy with a median time from delivery to diagnosis of 19 months (1-60). The frontline management was AS in 38 patients (61%) of whom 12 (33%) developed progressive disease and surgery in 23 patients (37%). In total, 30 patients underwent surgery and five had local recurrence (17%). Positive resection margins were no prognostic factor. Nine patients received systemic treatment in second- or third-line. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy-associated DF generally has an indolent behavior, where our results underscore the difficulty of establishing a clear definition of this entity. This study shows that AS should be the frontline management strategy for pregnancy-associated DF. When active treatment is indicated, surgery is a good option with low recurrence rates, even with positive (R1) resection margins.

Setting the international research agenda for sarcoma together with patients and carers: first results of the Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN) priority setting partnership.

BACKGROUND: Research in sarcomas has historically been the domain of scientists and clinicians attempting to understand the disease to develop effective treatments. This traditional approach of placing scientific rigor before the patient's reality is changing. This evolution is reflected in the growth of patient-centered organizations and patient advocacy groups that seek to meaningfully integrate patients into the research process. The aims of this study are to identify the unanswered questions regarding sarcomas (including gastrointestinal stromal tumors and desmoid fibromatosis) from patient, carer, and clinical perspectives and examine how patients and carers want to be involved in sarcoma research. METHODS: The Patient-Powered Research Network of Sarcoma Patients EuroNet set up a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) in collaboration with stakeholders from the sarcoma research field. This PSP is largely based on the James Lind Alliance methodology. RESULTS: In total, 264 sarcoma patients (73%) and carers (27%) from all over the world participated in the online survey and covered the full spectrum of sarcomas. The topics mentioned were labeled in accordance with the Common Scientific Outline of the International Cancer Research Partnership and lists for potential research topics, advocacy topics, and requests for information were constructed. With regard to patient and carer involvement, 64% were very willing to be actively involved and mainly in the following areas: sharing perspectives, discussing patient-clinician interactions, and attending research meetings. CONCLUSIONS: The first results of this sarcoma PSP identified important research questions, but also important topics for patient advocacy groups and further improvement of information materials. Sarcoma patients and carers have a strong wish to be involved in multiple aspects of sarcoma research. The next phase will identify the top 10 research priorities per tumor type. These priorities will provide guidance for research that will achieve greatest value and impact.

The age-related impact of surviving sarcoma on health-related quality of life: data from the SURVSARC study.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data of sarcoma survivors are scarce and the impact of age remains unclear. The aims of this population-based study were to (i) compare HRQoL scores amongst three age-groups [adolescents and young adults (AYA, aged 18-39 years), older adults (OA, aged 40-69 years) and elderly (aged ≥70 years)]; (ii) compare HRQoL of each sarcoma survivor age group with an age- and sex-matched normative population sample; (iii) determine factors associated with low HRQoL per age group. METHODS: Dutch sarcoma survivors, who were 2-10 years after diagnosis, were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-questions questionnaire on HRQoL. RESULTS: In total, 1099 survivors (58% response rate) completed the questionnaire: 186 AYAs, 748 OAs and 165 elderly. The median time since diagnosis for all patients was 5.2 years. Bone sarcomas were seen in 41% of AYAs, 22% of OAs and in 16% of elderly survivors (P < 0.01). AYA and OA survivors reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful worse physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning compared with a matched norm population, which was not the case for elderly survivors. AYAs reported significantly worse scores on emotional and cognitive functioning compared with OA and elderly survivors. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, osteosarcoma and chordoma were the subtypes of which survivors reported the lowest HRQoL scores in comparison with the norm. For all age groups, chemotherapy, having a bone sarcoma and having comorbidities were most frequently associated with low scores on HRQoL subscales, whereas a shorter time since diagnosis was not. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide sarcoma survivorship study, the disease and its treatment had relatively more impact on the HRQoL of AYA and OA survivors than on elderly survivors. These results emphasise the need for personalised follow-up care that not only includes risk-adjusted care related to disease relapse, but also age-adjusted care.

Embryonal and Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma in Adults: Real-Life Data From a Tertiary Sarcoma Centre.

AIMS: Embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS, ARMS) are subtypes of RMS that mainly occur in children, with relatively good outcomes. The incidence in adults is extremely low and survival is significantly worse compared with children. Data are scarce and literature generally combines all RMS subtypes, including pleomorphic RMS, which primarily occurs in adults and behaves more like undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and tumour characteristics, outcome and prognostic factors in adult patients with ERMS and ARMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult (18 years or older) ERMS and ARMS patients (presenting 1990-2016) were identified from a prospectively maintained database and were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 66 patients were included (42 men, 24 women). The median age at presentation was 28 years (range 18-71). The median overall survival for all ARMS (n = 42) and ERMS (n = 24) patients was 18 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 27%. Patients presenting with localised disease (n = 38, 58%) and metastatic disease (n = 25, 42%), had a 5-year overall survival rate of 36% and 11%, respectively. In univariate analysis we found alveolar subtype, fusion gene positivity, infiltrative tumour and metastatic presentation to be negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Survival in adult ERMS and ARMS patients is poor and the current data may be useful in the design of trials with novel agents. Ideally, paediatric and adult oncologists should set up trials together to get a better understanding of biological, genetic and clinically relevant factors in this disease.

Therapeutic control of oral anticoagulant treatment in The Netherlands.

Therapeutic control achieved by an anticoagulant clinic may be assessed by calculation of the proportion of time spent by the patients within the prothrombin time target range aimed for by the clinic. Three calculation methods for such assessment have been described by other investigators. The three methods were compared with the use of the database of one anticoagulant clinic (Leiden Thrombosis Centre). Discrepant levels of control were obtained by these methods because of incorrect assumptions in two of them. The most accurate method is the "cross-section-of-the-files" approach, in which the last-recorded prothrombin time per patient is used. The authors believe it should be implemented in each anticoagulant clinic. With the use of this method, the level of therapeutic control achieved by the Leiden Thrombosis Centre for its patients on long-term treatment amounted to 80%. The same method was applied by 37 other thrombosis centers in the Netherlands using a single target range of 2.8-4.8 International Normalized Ratio for their patients. Thirty-one centers achieved a level of control of at least 70% in their long-term patients. Underanticoagulation was observed more frequently than overanticoagulation.