Efficacy and safety of general anesthesia with caudal block for inguinal hernioplasty in children: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Caudal block is a type of regional anesthesia suitable for inguinal hernia surgery in children. Our goal was to determine the effectiveness of caudal block combined with general anesthesia in providing intra- and postoperative analgesia and its effect on hemodynamic stability and drug consumption. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, randomized controlled study included 78 boys, 3-5 years, with an indication for inguinal herniorrhaphy, divided into groups G (general anesthesia, n=39) and G+C (general anesthesia + caudal block, n=39). We monitored hemodynamic parameters intraoperatively, postoperative pain, and total consumption of all medicaments in the perioperative period. The monitoring of complications and side effects of drugs was also carried out. RESULTS: Boys in group G had statistically significantly higher values of heart rate in the 5th minute (p<0.01), in the 25th minute (p<0.01), and after awakening from anesthesia (p<0.01). We obtained similar results with systolic and diastolic pressure values in the 5th minute (p<0.01), 15th minute (p<0.01), 25th minute (p<0.01), before awakening from anesthesia (p<0.01) and after awakening (p<0.01). They also had significantly statistically higher total consumption of propofol, fentanyl, and acetaminophen (p<0.01). Boys in group G+C had significantly lower postoperative pain scores: initially (p<0.01), after 2 hours (p<0.01), and after 5 hours (p<0.01). No complications occurred in this group. CONCLUSIONS: In children, the combination of general anesthesia with caudal block, compared to general anesthesia only, is more efficient in suppressing visceral pain, leading to better hemodynamic stability, and reducing the consumption of medicines in the perioperative period.

Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection: insights into the angiographic finding and differential diagnosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), although in the majority of cases presents as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), has different pathophysiology from atherosclerosis that influences specific angiography findings and enables most patients to be solved by optimal medical therapy rather than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, accurate diagnosis is essential for adequate treatment of each patient as management of SCAD differs from that of ACS of atherosclerotic aetiology. So far, invasive coronary angiography remains the most important diagnostic tool in suspected SCAD. However, there are ambiguous cases that can mimic SCAD. In this review, the authors summarize current knowledge about the diagnostic algorithms, particularly angiographic features of SCAD, pitfalls of angiography, and the role of intracoronary imaging in the context of SCAD diagnosis. Finally, apart from the pathognomonic angiographic features of SCAD that are thoroughly discussed in this review, the authors focus on obscure angiography findings and findings that can mimic SCAD as well. Differential diagnosis and the timely recognition of SCAD are crucial as there are differences in the acute and long-term management of SCAD and other causes of ACS.

Dexmedetomidine vs. propofol sedation reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery - a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the clinical effects of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs. propofol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and analyze their effects on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and total hospital stay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 120 patients who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 60 patients. The first group was sedated with continuous dexmedetomidine in doses 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/h. The second group was sedated with propofol in doses 1-2 mg/kg/h. RESULTS: Patients sedated with dexmedetomidine required 2.2 hours less time on MV (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between the duration of MV and the ICU length of stay (r=0.368; p<0.001), as well as between the duration of MV and the total hospital stay (r=0.204; p=0.025). Delirium occurred in the postoperative period in 25% of patients sedated with propofol, while in the dexmedetomidine group it was only 11.7% (p=0.059). Patients who developed delirium had a significantly longer duration of MV (12.6±5.4 vs. 9.3±2.5 hours, p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine, compared to propofol, reduces the duration of MV, but does not influence the length of stay in the ICU and length of hospitalization after open heart surgery.