Magnesium supplementation modulates T-cell function in people with type 2 diabetes and low serum magnesium levels.

CONTEXT: Low magnesium levels, which are common in people with type 2 diabetes, are associated with increased levels of pro-inflammatory molecules. It is unknown whether magnesium supplementation decreases this low-grade inflammation in people with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: We performed a multidimensional immunophenotyping to better understand the effect of magnesium supplementation on the immune system of people with type 2 diabetes and low magnesium levels. METHODS: Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, cross-over study, we compared the effect of magnesium supplementation (15 mmol/day) to placebo on the immunophenotype including whole blood immune cell counts, T-cell and CD14+ monocyte function after ex vivo stimulation, and the circulating inflammatory proteome. RESULTS: We included 12 adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (7 males, mean±SD age 67±7 years, BMI 31±5 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.5±0.9 %) and low magnesium levels (0.73±0.05 mmol/l). Magnesium treatment significantly increased serum magnesium and the urinary magnesium excretion, when compared to placebo. The IFN-γ production from PMA/ionomycin stimulated CD8+ T-cells and T-helper 1 cells, as well as the IL4/IL5/IL13 production from T-helper 2 cells was lower after treatment with magnesium compared to placebo. Magnesium supplementation did not affect immune cell numbers, ex vivo monocyte function and circulating inflammatory proteins, although we found a tendency for lower high sensitive CRP levels after magnesium supplementation compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, magnesium supplementation modulates the function of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in people with type 2 diabetes and low serum magnesium levels.

Oral magnesium supplementation does not affect insulin sensitivity in people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and a low serum magnesium: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Hypomagnesaemia has been associated with insulin resistance and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Whether magnesium supplementation improves insulin sensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes and a low serum magnesium level is unknown. METHODS: Using a randomised, double-blind (both participants and investigators were blinded to the participants' treatment sequences), placebo-controlled, crossover study design, we compared the effect of oral magnesium supplementation (15 mmol/day) for 6 weeks with that of matched placebo in individuals with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (age ≥18 years, BMI 18-40 kg/m2, HbA1c <100 mmol/mol [11.3%], serum magnesium ≤0.79 mmol/l). Participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic and through advertisements. Randomisation to a treatment sequence order was done using a randomisation list. We used block randomisation and the two possible treatment sequences were evenly distributed among the trial population. The primary outcome was the mean glucose infusion rate during the final 30 min of a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (i.e. M value). Secondary outcomes included variables of glucose control, insulin need, BP, lipid profile and hypomagnesaemia-related symptoms during follow-up. RESULTS: We recruited 14 participants (50% women, 100% White, mean ± SD age 67±6 years, BMI 31±5 kg/m2, HbA1c 58±9 mmol/mol [7.4±0.9%]) with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Magnesium supplementation increased both mean ± SEM serum magnesium level (0.75±0.02 vs 0.70±0.02 mmol/l, p=0.016) and urinary magnesium excretion (magnesium/creatinine ratio, 0.23±0.02 vs 0.15±0.02, p=0.005), as compared with placebo. The M value of the glucose clamp did not differ between the magnesium and placebo study arms (4.6±0.5 vs 4.4±0.6 mg kg-1 min-1, p=0.108). During the 6 weeks of treatment, continuous glucose monitoring outcomes, HbA1c, insulin dose, lipid profile and BP also did not differ, except for a lower HDL-cholesterol concentration after magnesium compared with placebo (1.14±0.08 vs 1.20±0.09 mmol/l, p=0.026). Symptoms potentially related to hypomagnesaemia were similar for both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Despite an albeit modest increase in serum magnesium concentration, oral magnesium supplementation does not improve insulin sensitivity in people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and low magnesium levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2021-001243-27. FUNDING: This study was supported by a grant from the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (2017-81-014).

No insulin degludec dose adjustment required after aerobic exercise for people with type 1 diabetes: the ADREM study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: It is generally recommended to reduce basal insulin doses after exercise to reduce the risk of post-exercise nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Based on its long t½, it is unknown whether such adjustments are required or beneficial for insulin degludec. METHODS: The ADREM study (Adjustment of insulin Degludec to Reduce post-Exercise (nocturnal) hypoglycaeMia in people with diabetes) was a randomised controlled, crossover study in which we compared 40% dose reduction (D40), or postponement and 20% dose reduction (D20-P), with no dose adjustment (CON) in adults with type 1 diabetes at elevated risk of hypoglycaemia, who performed a 45 min aerobic exercise test in the afternoon. All participants wore blinded continuous glucose monitors for 6 days, measuring the incidence of (nocturnal) hypoglycaemia and subsequent glucose profiles. RESULTS: We recruited 18 participants (six women, age 38 ± 13 years, HbA1c 56 ± 8 mmol/mol [7.3 ± 0.8%], mean ± SD). Time below range (i.e. glucose <3.9 mmol/l) the night after the exercise test was generally low and occurrence did not differ between the treatment regimens. During the subsequent whole day, time below range was lower for D40 compared with CON (median [IQR], 0 [0-23] vs 18 [0-55] min, p=0.043), without differences in the number of hypoglycaemic events. Time above range (i.e. glucose >10 mmol/l) was greater for D20-P vs CON (mean ± SEM, 584 ± 81 vs 364 ± 66 min, p=0.001) and D40 (385 ± 72 min, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Post-exercise adjustment of degludec does not mitigate the risk of subsequent nocturnal hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes. Although reducing degludec reduced next-day time below range, this did not translate into fewer hypoglycaemic events, while postponing degludec should be avoided because of increased time above range. Altogether, these data do not support degludec dose adjustment after a single exercise bout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2019-004222-22 FUNDING: The study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Novo Nordisk, Denmark.

[Physical exercise and insulin use: challenges for people with diabetes mellitus]. / Sporten en insulinegebruik.

Physical exercise has many health benefits, equally so for people with diabetes mellitus. The glycaemic responses to the various types of exercise differ and include an increased risk of late (nocturnal) hypoglycaemia, making physical exercise a challenge for some people with diabetes who are treated with insulin. Insulin treatment interferes with normal physiologic responses to exercise, which are necessary to maintain the blood glucose level within the normal range. During aerobic exercise, the blood glucose concentration usually drops, whereas anaerobic exercise generally causes a rise in glycaemia in people with diabetes using insulin. In people with insulin treated diabetes, a combination of frequent (continuous) blood glucose monitoring, adjustments in insulin dose and ingestion of carbohydrates ensures a safe management of glycaemia during and after physical activity.

Voice Characteristics in Patients with Acromegaly during Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Active acromegaly is characterized by Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-1 excess. Voice complaints are common in active acromegaly and are suggested to be caused by effects of Growth Hormone or IGF-1 on vocal folds and the surrounding soft tissues. Prospective studies on the course of voice characteristics in acromegaly patients are scarce and results are conflicting. This study investigates objective changes in voice parameters, self-reported perception of voice and laryngostroboscopic features during the first 2.5 years of acromegaly treatment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this prospective study, acoustic voice analysis (and videolaryngostroboscopic examination were performed in 27 consecutive treatment-naive acromegaly patients at diagnosis (T0), after 1 year (T1) and after 2.5 years (T2) of treatment. The voice handicap index (VHI-30) questionnaire was taken. RESULTS: During acromegaly treatment, VHI scores decreased, and mucosal edema & hypertrophy diminished. No significant changes in objective voice parameters were detected. The within-subject change in serum IGF-1 levels (97.3 (40.6-208) to 22.4 (10.2-34.1) nmol/L (P < 0.001)) during follow-up correlated positively with the changes in VHI questionnaire scores (R 0.32-0.45; P = 0.002-0.03). CONCLUSIONS: At diagnosis and during acromegaly treatment, mean VHI scores were in the normal range, although they decreased during follow-up. Mucosal edema and hypertrophy largely resolved during treatment. No significant changes in objective voice parameters were observed. Voice characteristics are in the normal range in patients with acromegaly, but may change during treatment. However, voice complaints are important to discuss, since they may influence quality of life.

The Course of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Patients With Acromegaly During Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is common in active acromegaly and negatively influences quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. This prospective study with 3 predetermined timepoints and a standardized treatment protocol investigates changes in sleep parameters during the first 2.5 years of acromegaly treatment. METHODS: Before initiation of acromegaly treatment (medical pretreatment followed by surgery), polysomnography (PSG) was performed in 27 consecutive patients with treatment-naive acromegaly. PSG was repeated after 1 year (N = 24) and 2.5 years (N = 23), and anthropometric and biochemical parameters were obtained. RESULTS: At baseline, 74.1% of the patients was diagnosed with OSAS. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI; P = 0.001), oxygen desaturation index (ODI; P = 0.001), lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2; P = 0.007) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; P < 0.001) improved significantly during treatment, with the greatest improvement in the first year. After 2.5 years of treatment, all patients had controlled acromegaly. Of the 16 patients with repeated PSG and OSAS at baseline, 11 (68.8%) were cured of OSAS. Changes in RDI, ODI, LSaO2, and ESS correlated with insulin-like growth factor 1 levels. CONCLUSION: OSAS has a high prevalence in active acromegaly. There is a substantial decrease in prevalence and severity of OSAS following acromegaly treatment, with the largest improvement during the first year. Most patients recover from OSAS following surgical or biochemical control of the acromegaly. Therefore, a PSG is advised after diagnosis of acromegaly. When OSAS is present, it should be treated and PSG should be repeated during acromegaly treatment.

Bilaterally enlarged adrenal glands without obvious cause: need for a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up.

Bilateral enlarged adrenal glands are rare, and as diagnostic delay may have serious consequences for the patient, we recommend a multidisciplinary approach of specialists in the field of endocrinology, oncology, radiology, and clinical chemistry prior to the start of the diagnostic work-up.