Coronary artery thromboembolism as a cause of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) usually represents the clinical manifestation of atherothrombotic coronary artery disease (CAD) resulting from atherosclerotic plaque rupture. However, there are cases in which coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography angiography reveals patients with acute coronary syndrome with non-obstructive CAD. This clinical entity is defined as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and often considered as a clinical dynamic working diagnosis that needs further investigations for the establishment of a final etiologic diagnosis. The main causes of a MINOCA working diagnosis include atherosclerotic, non-atherosclerotic (vessel-related and non-vessel-related), and thromboembolic causes This literature review aimed to investigate the major thromboembolic causes in patients presenting with MINOCA regarding their etiology and pathophysiologic mechanisms, as well as diagnostic and treatment methods.

Sex-related cardiovascular prognosis in patients with hypertensive emergencies: a 12-month study.

Current evidence on the prognosis of patients with a hypertensive crisis and predisposing factors is limited. We registered the clinical phenotype of patients with HC admitted to the emergency department, while those with a hypertensive emergency (HE) were hospitalized. One-year outcomes, i.e., composite of death or cardiovascular hospitalizations, were determined in patients with HE after hospital discharge. Out of 38,589 patients assessed in the emergency department, 256 hypertensive urgencies and 97 HE was registered. After stratification of the HE by sex, 48 men and 46 women completed the one-year follow-up. Men had more events than women (27 vs. 13, Ηazard Ratio 2.2, 95% Confidence Interval 1.03-4.7, p = 0.042) after adjustment for age, cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus. Our study raises the hypothesis that the male sex is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in HE patients. CV Cardiovascular, BP blood pressure. The diagram presents the groups of comparison, men versus women in hypertensive emergencies that completed the 1-year follow-up for outcomes, in terms of hospitalizations or deaths.

Fatty liver index and cardiovascular outcomes in never-treated hypertensive patients: a prospective cohort.

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been increasing rapidly worldwide, affecting 25-30% of the population. Fatty liver index (FLI) is a validated marker of NAFLD and can be used as a screening tool for hepatic steatosis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between FLI and the risk of major cardiovascular events in never treated hypertensive patients. We included 903 hypertensive patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (mean age 52.7 ± 11.4 years; men 55%; baseline clinic BP 149.8 ± 15.2/95.5 ± 10.1 mmHg). Participants were prospectively evaluated for a mean follow-up period of 5.2 ± 3.2 years with at least one annual visit. Patients were also categorized into two groups using an FLI of 60 units. The incidence of cardiovascular events during follow-up was 8.5% (n = 77). Patients with FLI < 60 (n = 625) had a better BP control compared to their counterparts with FLI ≥ 60 (n = 278) during follow up (43% vs 33%, p = 0.02). Cox-regression analysis indicated that FLI (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001), FLI z-scores (HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.22-6.04) and high-risk FLI (HR, 7.5; 95% CI, 3.12-18.04) were independent determinants of the outcome after adjustment for baseline and follow-up variables. Stratification by diabetes mellitus indicated that FLI predicted the outcome to a greater extent in those with than those without diabetes (P-interaction < 0.001). In conclusion, FLI has an independent prognostic value for the incidence of cardiovascular events in newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive patients. Therefore, FLI might identify higher-risk patients in the primary prevention of hypertension.

Blood pressure control measures and cardiovascular outcomes: a prospective hypertensive cohort.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether blood pressure (BP) control measures, visit-to-visit BP variability, and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are associated with future cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 1,408 hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease, we prospectively evaluated the incident major cardiovascular events over 6 years. In newly diagnosed patients, antihypertensive drug treatment was initiated. We estimated two markers of on-treatment BP control, (1) visit-to-visit BPV as the coefficient of variation of office systolic BP (BP-CV), and (2) TTR calculated as the percentage of office systolic BP measurements within 120-140mmHg across visits. RESULTS: The hypertensive cohort (672 males, mean age 60 years, 31% newly diagnosed) had a mean systolic/diastolic BP of 142/87 mmHg. The mean number of visits was 4.9 ± 2.6, while the mean attained systolic/diastolic BP during follow-up was 137/79 mmHg using 2.7 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs. The BP-CV and TTR were 9.1 ± 4.1% and 45 ± 29%, respectively, and the incidence of the composite outcome was 8.3% (n = 117). After adjustment for relevant confounders and standardization to z-scores, BP-CV and TTR were associated with a 43% (95% CI, 27-62%) increase and a 33% (95% CI, 15-47%) reduction in the outcome. However, the joint evaluation of TTR and BP-CV in a common multivariable model indicated that a standardized change of TTR was associated with the outcome to a greater extent than BP-CV (mean hazard ratios of 30% vs. 24%, respectively). When combined with the higher BP standardized-CV quartile, the lower TTR quartile predicted the outcome by 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) compared to the inverse TTR and BP-CV quartile pattern. CONCLUSION: High BP-CV or low TTR was associated with future cardiovascular events in a cohort of treated hypertensive patients. As a determinant, the extent of TTR value appears greater than BP-CV when these measures are considered in the same multivariable model.

Net clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with or without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of outcome trials.

AIM: To evaluate the net clinical benefit following direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin by diabetes status in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We searched 3 electronic databases through end-February 2021 to identify relevant outcome trials in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). All-cause death, non-fatal stroke/systemic embolism and major bleedings defined net clinical benefit. Outcome risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI), and absolute risk outcome reduction per 1000 treated patients were assessed. RESULTS: Four trials of DOACs vs warfarin compared 22,087 patients with DM to 49,592 patients without DM. CHADS2 and 10-year fatal cardiovascular risk were higher in patients with vs those without DM (3.7 vs 2.5 and 28.4% vs 23.4%, respectively). DOACs were associated with more favorable net clinical benefit compared to warfarin in patients with and without DM (relative risk reduction, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81-0.89] and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79-0.96]; absolute risk reduction per 1000 patients treated, -33 [95% CI, -45, -21]) and -24 [95% CI, -43, -5]), but interaction test was not significant by relative and absolute numbers (P = 0.68 and P = 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSION: Net clinical benefit following DOACs was not different between patients with and without DM over a period of 2.2 years.

Isolated diastolic vs. systolic hypertension phenotypes and outcomes: prospective cohort of newly diagnosed individuals with hypertension.

AIMS: To evaluate whether different hypertension phenotypes, namely, isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) and systolic/diastolic hypertension (SDH) have a differential outcome effect by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated in 569 never-treated patients with sustained hypertension (age 52.6 ±â€Š11.6 years; men 55%; clinic BP 150 ±â€Š15/95.5 ±â€Š10 mmHg, systolic/diastolic; 24-h ambulatory BP 128.9 ±â€Š12.6/80.6 ±â€Š9.7) the incidence of major cardiovascular (CV) events within 5 years, after adjustment for confounders, including the rate of BP control and the weighted follow-up BP. RESULTS: All participants received antihypertensive drug treatment (mean number of drugs 1.9 ±â€Š1.1; follow-up visits 4.6/patient). Average clinic BP achieved during follow-up was 136 ±â€Š12.6/83.9 ±â€Š9.4 mmHg, with 39% of participants having clinic BP less than 140/90 mmHg in at least 75% of their visits, and 24% in 25-75% of visits. Prevalence of hypertension phenotypes defined using BP differed from that using ambulatory BP, whereas integration of both BP measurements reclassified the initial phenotype to another in 18% of participants. Although, no differential outcome effect was observed between clinic IDH and SDH assessed using clinic or ambulatory BP measurements, clinic BP-based ISH was associated with a higher outcome incidence than the IDH and SDH phenotypes (hazard ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4-17.0, P = 0.015). ISH diagnosed by integration of clinic and ambulatory BP, also increased the outcome (hazard ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients at low/moderate CV risk, IDH and SDH phenotypes defined by clinic BP measurements, equally determined CV events but to a lower extent compared with ISH.