Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Dev Neurosci ; 33: 8-14, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24239914

RESUMO

Polybrominateddiphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are widely utilized as the additive brominated flame retardants in electronic devices, furniture, plastics, rubber foam, and textiles, which exhibit many negative biological effects, especially potential toxic effects on neurodevelopment. In the present study, we applied a proteomics approach to study the effects of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and/or tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) on the expression of proteins extracted from neural stem/progenitor cells and further explored mechanisms on neurodevelopmental toxicity. We sub-cultured 3-4 generations of neural stem/progenitor cells which were exposed to BDE-209 and/or BDE-47. After a 72-h exposure, we applied two-dimensional gel (2-DE) to identify differentially expressed proteins and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to determine the protein identity of 25 spots. Western blot analysis was applied to determine the expression of cofilin-1 and vimentin. A total of 39 differential expression protein spots were identified by 2-DE after BDE-209 and/or BDE-47 exposure in the neural stem/progenitor cells, and 19 differentially expressed proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS. Western blot analysis revealed that cofilin-1 and vimentin were differentially expressed in all groups. Expression of both proteins was decreased when the neural stem/progenitor cells were exposed to BDE-209 and were absent when exposed to both BDE-47 and BDE-209. BDE-209 and/or BDE-47 might alter the expression of some proteins of neural stem/progenitor cells. Nineteen proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS, which will provide a useful basis for further study of the mechanisms underlying PBDE-mediated neurotoxicity.


Assuntos
Éteres Difenil Halogenados/farmacologia , Células-Tronco Neurais/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteômica/métodos , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz
2.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 47(10): 764-8, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23302735

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the lowest effective dosage of mifepristone combined with misoprostol in terminating ultra-early pregnancy. METHODS: All the cases of ultra-early pregnancy classified by amenorrhea days, ß-hCG and vaginal B-ultrasonic were randomly divided into two groups. One hundred cases in G1 group (minimized dosage) were orally administered 25 mg mifepristone once a day for 2 days and combined with 200 µg misoprostol 48 hours later, while 150 mg mifepristone combined with 600 µg misoprostol 48 hours later were given to 100 cases in G2 group (normal dosage). All cases were observed for 6 hours after taking misoprostol and returned for assessment three days later. RESULTS: None missing. Expulsion of conceptus: G1 and G2 group were 22 (22.0%, 22/100) and 25 (25.0%, 25/100; P > 0.05). Failure rate: cases with incomplete abortion were 1 (1.0%, 1/100) and 2 (2.0%, 2/100) in G1 and G2 group, hospitalization for suspected ectopic pregnancies both was 1 (1.0%). Bleeding: bleeding cases during the administration of mifepristone in G1 and G2 group were 71 (71.0%, 71/100) and 78 (78.0%, 78/100; P > 0.05); the mean bleeding time were (5.3 ± 1.4) days and (6.0 ± 1.5) days (P < 0.01). Other side effects: in G1 group, majority showed light nausea (7.0%, 7/100) and light abdominal pain (20.0%, 20/100). Menses recovery: 99 (99.0%, 99/100) for G1 group and 98 (98.0%, 98/100) for G2 group to recovery on scheduled time. Satisfactions: both were 99 (99.0%, 99/100). Except mean bleeding days and side-effects, the differences above showed no significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is safe and effective treatment with the lowest dosages of mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate ultra-early pregnancies.


Assuntos
Abortivos/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido/métodos , Mifepristona/administração & dosagem , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Abortivos/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Mifepristona/efeitos adversos , Misoprostol/efeitos adversos , Náusea/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA