Decision model for durable clinical benefit from front- or late-line immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Predictive biomarkers and models of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, evidence for many biomarkers remains inconclusive, and the opaqueness of machine learning models hinders practicality. We aimed to provide compelling evidence for biomarkers and develop a transparent decision tree model. METHODS: We consolidated data from 3,288 ICI-treated patients with NSCLC across real-world multicenter, public cohorts and the Choice-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03856411). Over 50 features were examined for predicting durable clinical benefits (DCBs) from ICIs. Noteworthy biomarkers were identified to establish a decision tree model. Additionally, we explored the tumor microenvironment and peripheral CD8+ programmed death-1 (PD-1)+ T cell receptor (TCR) profiles. FINDINGS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor histology, PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden, line, and regimen of ICI treatment as significant factors. Mutation subtypes of EGFR, KRAS, KEAP1, STK11, and disruptive TP53 mutations were associated with DCB. The decision tree (DT10) model, using the ten clinicopathological and genomic markers, showed superior performance in predicting DCB in the training set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82) and consistently outperformed other models in test sets. DT10-predicted-DCB patients manifested longer survival, an enriched inflamed tumor immune phenotype (67%), and higher peripheral TCR diversity, whereas the DT10-predicted-NDB (non-durable benefit) group showed an enriched desert immune phenotype (86%) and higher peripheral TCR clonality. CONCLUSIONS: The model effectively predicted DCB after front-/subsequent-line ICI treatment, with or without chemotherapy, for squamous and non-squamous lung cancer, offering clinicians valuable insights into efficacy prediction using cost-effective variables. FUNDING: This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China.

Evaluation of first-line and salvage therapies for unresectable malignant mesothelioma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies for unresectable malignant mesothelioma have reported conflicting results. It is crucial and urgent to find optimal treatment options for this malignancy, which currently has a poor prognosis. METHODS: Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences were searched until February 29, 2024. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: We analyzed 16 RCTs with a total of 5018 patients. Among first-line therapies, nivolumab and ipilimumab significantly increased OS and resulted in fewer grade ≥3 TRAEs. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased PFS. Among salvage therapies, ramucirumab and chemotherapy was associated with the best OS and PFS, but resulted in more grade ≥3 TRAEs. Subgroup analysis by histologic types suggested that in first-line settings, bevacizumab and chemotherapy increase OS the most for epithelioid type, while the nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment increases OS the most for non-epithelioid type. In salvage therapies, ramucirumab and chemotherapy increase OS for both epithelioid and non-epithelioid types. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the best OS among first-line treatments. Ramucirumab and chemotherapy was associated with the best clinical outcomes in salvage settings. Treatment for malignant mesothelioma should be tailored based on different clinicopathological characteristics.

Screening for depression and anxiety in lung cancer patients: A real-world study using GAD-7 and HADS.

BACKGROUND: The psychological well-being of lung cancer patients is critical in-patient care but frequently overlooked. METHODS: This study, employing a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based design, aimed to elucidate the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among lung cancer patients and identify associated risk factors. Participants' demographic, medical history, disease stage, and pathology were systematically collected. Psychological assessment was conducted using the general anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 25.0). RESULTS: Out of 294 distributed questionnaires, 247 lung cancer patients were included in the final analysis, with an average completion time of 9.08 min. Notably, 32.4% exhibited depressive symptoms, while 30% displayed signs of anxiety. A significant correlation was found between both depressive and anxiety symptoms and a history of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Specifically, increased nicotine dependence and greater cumulative tobacco use were linked to higher rates of depressive symptoms, whereas cumulative alcohol consumption was associated with increased risks of anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSION: The study affirms the feasibility of GAD-7, PHQ-9, and HADS as screening tools for depressive and anxiety symptoms in lung cancer patients. It further highlights tobacco and alcohol consumption as significant risk factors for poor psychological health in this population.

Prediction performance comparison of biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), tissue or blood tumor mutation burden (tTMB, bTMB), gene expression profile (GEP), driver gene mutation, and combined biomarkers for immunotherapy response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In part 1, clinical trials involved with predictive biomarker exploration for immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and predictive value of the biomarkers were evaluated. In part 2, public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated NSCLC involved with biomarkers were curated (N = 871). Odds ratio (OR) of the positive versus negative biomarker group for objective response rate (ORR) was measured. RESULTS: In part 1, the AUC of combined biomarkers (0.75) was higher than PD-L1 (0.64), tTMB (0.64), bTMB (0.68), GEP (0.67), and driver gene mutation (0.51). Combined biomarkers also had higher specificity, positive likelihood ratio and positive predictive value than single biomarkers. In part 2, the OR of combined biomarkers of PD-L1 plus TMB (PD-L1 cutoff 1%, 0.14; cutoff 50% 0.13) was lower than that of PD-L1 (cutoff 1%, 0.33; cutoff 50% 0.24), tTMB (0.28), bTMB (0.48), EGFR mutation (0.17) and KRAS mutation (0.47), for distinguishing ORR of patients after immunotherapy. Furthermore, positive PD-L1, tTMB-high, wild-type EGFR, and positive PD-L1 plus TMB were associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). CONCLUSION: Combined biomarkers have superior predictive accuracy than single biomarkers for immunotherapy response of NSCLC. Further investigation is warranted to select optimal biomarkers for various clinical settings.

A single-cell characterised signature integrating heterogeneity and microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma for prognostic stratification.

BACKGROUND: The high heterogeneity of tumour and the complexity of tumour microenvironment (TME) greatly impacted the tumour development and the prognosis of cancer in the era of immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed to portray the single cell-characterised landscape of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and develop an integrated signature incorporating both tumour heterogeneity and TME for prognosis stratification. METHODS: Single-cell tagged reverse transcription sequencing (STRT-seq) was performed on tumour tissues and matched normal tissues from 14 patients with LUAD for immune landscape depiction and candidate key genes selection for signature construction. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and in-vitro cell experiments were conducted to confirm the gene functions. The transcriptomic profile of 1949 patients from 11 independent cohorts including nine public datasets and two in-house cohorts were obtained for validation. FINDINGS: We selected 11 key genes closely related to cell-to-cell interaction, tumour development, T cell phenotype transformation, and Ma/Mo cell distribution, including HLA-DPB1, FAM83A, ITGB4, OAS1, FHL2, S100P, FSCN1, SFTPD, SPP1, DBH-AS1, CST3, and established an integrated 11-gene signature, stratifying patients to High-Score or Low-Score group for better or worse prognosis. Moreover, the prognostically-predictive potency of the signature was validated by 11 independent cohorts, and the immunotherapeutic predictive potency was also validated by our in-house cohort treated by immunotherapy. Additionally, the in-vitro cell experiments and drug sensitivity prediction further confirmed the gene function and generalizability of this signature across the entire RNA profile spectrum. INTERPRETATION: This single cell-characterised 11-gene signature might offer insights for prognosis stratification and potential guidance for treatment selection. FUNDING: Support for the study was provided by National key research and development project (2022YFC2505004, 2022YFC2505000 to Z.W. and J.W.), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7242114 to J.X.), National Natural Science Foundation of China of China (82102886 to J.X., 81871889 and 82072586 to Z.W.), Beijing Nova Program (20220484119 to J.X.), NSFC general program (82272796 to J.W.), NSFC special program (82241229 to J.W.), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-1-I2M-012, 2022-I2M-1-009 to Z.W. and J.W.), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7212084 to Z.W.), CAMS Key lab of translational research on lung cancer (2018PT31035 to J.W.), Aiyou Foundation (KY201701 to J.W.). Medical Oncology Key Foundation of Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CICAMS-MOCP2022003 to J.X.).

Assessment of human leukocyte antigen-based neoantigen presentation to determine pan-cancer response to immunotherapy.

Despite the central role of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) in tumor neoantigen presentation, quantitative determination of presentation capacity remains elusive. Based on a pooled pan-cancer genomic dataset of 885 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we developed a score integrating the binding affinity of neoantigens to HLA-I, as well as HLA-I allele divergence, termed the HLA tumor-Antigen Presentation Score (HAPS). Patients with a high HAPS were more likely to experience survival benefit following ICI treatment. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment indicated that the antigen presentation pathway was enriched in patients with a high HAPS. Finally, we built a neural network incorporating factors associated with neoantigen production, presentation, and recognition, which exhibited potential for differentiating cancer patients likely to benefit from ICIs. Our findings highlight the clinical utility of evaluating HLA-I tumor antigen presentation capacity and describe how ICI response may depend on HLA-mediated immunity.

Real-world outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy and selective RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion is a target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and RET inhibitors are approved for advanced NSCLC. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of ICIs and RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021 were analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ICIs and RET inhibitors treatments were collected. Results: Seventy-five patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC were identified. The median age of patients was 57 years, half of the patients were female (50.3%), and most were non-smokers or light smokers (72%). Of the cancer types diagnosed in study patients, the KIF5B-RET fusion subtype accounted for 73.3% (55/75), twelve patients (16%) had CCDC6-RET fusion, and three (4%) had NCOA4-RET fusion. Sixteen patients were treated with ICIs. In previously untreated patients, we observed an objective response rate (ORR) of 71.4% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 7.5 months in seven assessable patients. Of four patients with PD-L1 overexpression (>50%) one received pembrolizumab and the other three patients received pemetrexed, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab. In these patients, the ORR was 75% and disease control rate was 100%. Fifteen patients received selective RET inhibitors (pralsetinib and selpercatinib), resulting in an ORR of 53.3% (8/15) and median PFS of 10.0 months (95% CI 5.2-14.9). Conclusions: ICIs for PD-L overexpression and treatment naive patients offer comparable benefits for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, warranting further investigation.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a promising therapeutic strategy. The situation for ICI rechallenge can be divided into three categories: adverse events (AEs); resistance to ICIs, and rechallenge becomes compulsive because of tumor relapse while the patients had completed a 2 year course of immunotherapy. However, these categories are still controversial and should be explored further. Through voting at the 6th Straits Summit Forum on Lung Cancer, in this study we summarize the consensus of 147 experts in ICI rechallenges. A total of 97.74% experts agreed to rechallenge; 48.87% experts rechallenge with the original drug, and the others rechallenge with a different drug; 40.3% agreed to rechallenge directly after progression; 88.06% experts agreed to ICI rechallenge with a combination regimen; and factors such as previous performance status score, PD-1 expression, and age should also be considered. Understanding the the clinical studies in ICI rechallenge could bring us one step closer to understanding the consensus. In patients with advanced NSCLC who have suffered recurrent or distant metastasis after immunotherapy, the option of rechallenge with ICIs is a promising treatment option.

Erratum to 'Evolution and genotypic characteristics of small cell lung cancer transformation in non-small cell lung carcinomas' [Journal of the National Cancer Center, 1 (2021), 4: 153-162].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.11.001.].

Dynamic toxicity landscape of immunotherapy for solid tumors across treatment lines.

Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3) have been widely studied and applied throughout the course of cancer treatment. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive profile of ICI-associated toxicity and elucidate the toxicity patterns of ICIs across different treatment lines. Methods: In total, 155 cohorts comprising 24 539 eligible patients were included in the safety analysis. Trial name, registration number, cancer type, trial phase, clinical setting, trial design, regimen, dosing schedule, age, sex and ethnicity distributions, number of patients, number of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), and number of treatment-related death were extracted. We defined a timeline from the neoadjuvant setting to the third-line setting. We also introduced a synthesizing principle for adverse event rates (SPAER) of immunotherapy to ensure the comparability and reliability across different treatment lines. The study protocol was registered and approved by the PROSPERO protocol review committee (CRD42021242368). Results: After excluding the neoadjuvant setting group, we observed a distinct reduction in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) with an advancement of the line of ICI treatment. The incidence of trAEs was negatively correlated with the line of treatment, irrespective of whether monotherapy or dual-ICI combination therapy was administered. Sensitivity analyses also confirmed the coincident negative correlations. Conclusion: In summary, using a timeline-based concept centered around treatment lines, we revealed the dynamic landscape of ICI-associated toxicity and found that patients treated with ICIs during later lines of therapy may have a lower risk of trAEs.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis in lung cancer (2022 edition).

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Bone is a common metastatic site of lung cancer, about 50% of bone metastatic patients will experience skeletal related events (SREs). SREs not only seriously impact the quality of life of patients, but also shorten their survival time. The treatment of bone metastasis requires multi-disciplinary therapy (MDT) and development of individualized treatment plan. In order to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis in lung cancer, the expert group of the MDT Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association has developed the expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer bone metastasis.

Therapeutic guidance of tumor mutation burden on immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.

Background: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) remains a promising but ambiguous predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We investigated the predictive value of TMB in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by ICI-containing therapies under strictly matched clinical settings. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv databases were searched till October 16, 2021. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared patients with high TMB (TMB-H) and low TMB (TMB-L) and provided hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs were included, and mirror-based meta-analysis was performed (Part1). Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of distinct first-line regimens in TMB-H and TMB-L groups (Part2). Public cohorts were used for validation and further exploration (Part3). Results: Twelve RCTs (n=5527) and 5 public cohorts (n=573) were included. In Part1, TMB-H patients generally exhibited a more significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from ICI-containing therapies compared to TMB-L patients (HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.49-0.67, P < 0.0001). In Part2, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy ranked best for PFS in both TMB-H and TMB-L groups. Anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapies indicated better PFS and overall survival (OS) benefit than single ICI and chemotherapy in the TMB-H group, but ranked worst in the TMB-L group. Finally, TMB was validated to be an independent predictive biomarker from programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in Part3, which could further distinguish beneficiaries of ICI-containing therapies with PD-L1 < 50%. Conclusion: TMB-H could be a predictive biomarker independent of PD-L1 expression to identify beneficiaries of ICI-containing therapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Evolution and genotypic characteristics of small cell lung cancer transformation in non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation had previously been reported mainly in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant adenocarcinoma. However, the underlying genomic profile remains unclear. Our study aimed to find the evolution and genotypic characteristic of SCLC transformation. Methods: Thirty-one SCLC transformation patients who were initially diagnosed as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were included. Whole exome sequencing (WES) of both primary and transformed re-biopsy lesions was conducted on 12 patients. Clinical characteristics were analyzed using R software (v.3.6.1). Results: Our study included 31 patients, of whom, three had lung squamous cell carcinoma, 6 patients did not carry EGFR mutations, and 30 patients received chemotherapy for SCLCs. The disease control rate (DCR) was 96.7%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.03 months. The median time to transformation was 33.07 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 62.08 months. Somatic mutation analysis showed that besides TP53, RB1, and EGFR, there was a high occurrence of mutations to CSMD3 and ADAMTS19, especially in the EGFR-wild type (EGFR-wt) group. Concerning mutational signature, the EGFR-mutant (EGFR-mut) transformed group favored an apolipoprotein B (APOBEC) mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like-associated mutation pattern (P = 0.16). DNA damage repair (DDR)-related signatures were significantly enriched in the EGFR-wt transformed group (P = 0.034). Additionally, clonal evolution analysis revealed that all patients had the same main trunk genes in the phylogenetic tree. Transformed SCLCs are not sensitive to immunotherapy, possibly due to increased tumor heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the EGFR-wt patients could also transform to SCLCs, but they have different genetic features with EGFR-mut patients. SCLC-transformed patients respond to classical chemotherapy and have a better prognosis than those with classical SCLCs.