Development and Validation of a Noninvasive Model for the Detection of High-Risk Varices in Patients with Unresectable HCC.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-invasive variceal risk stratification systems have not been validated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which presents logistical barriers for patients in the setting of systemic HCC therapy. We aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive algorithm for the prediction of varices in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 21 centers in the US including adult patients with unresectable HCC and Child Pugh A5-B7 cirrhosis diagnosed between 2007 and2019. We included patients who completed an esophagogastroduodonoscopy (EGD) within 12 months of index imaging but prior to HCC treatment. We divided the cohort into a 70:30 training set and validation set, with the goal of maximizing negative predictive value (NPV) to avoid EGD in low-risk patients. RESULTS: We included 707 patients (median age 64.6 years, 80.6% male and 74.0% White). Median time from HCC diagnosis to EGD was 47 (IQR: 114) days, with 25.0% of patients having high-risk varices. A model using clinical variables alone achieved a NPV of 86.3% in the validation cohort, while a model integrating clinical and imaging variables had an NPV 97.4% in validation. The clinical and imaging model would avoid EGDs in over half of low-risk patients while misclassifying 7.7% of high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: A model incorporating clinical and imaging data can accurately predict the absence of high-risk varices in patients with HCC and avoid EGD in many low-risk patients prior to the initiation of systemic therapy, thus expediting their care and avoiding treatment delays.

Liver transplantation provides survival benefit at all levels of frailty: From the Multicenter Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation Study.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Offering LT to frail patients may reduce waitlist mortality but may increase post-LT mortality. LT survival benefit is the concept of balancing these risks. We sought to quantify net survival benefit with LT by liver frailty index (LFI). APPROACH RESULTS: We analyzed data in the multi-center Functional Assessment in LT (FrAILT) Study from 2012-2021. Pre-LT cohort included ambulatory patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT, without hepatocellular carcinoma; post-LT cohort included those who underwent LT. Primary outcomes were pre-LT and post-LT mortality. We computed 1-, 3-, and 5-year restricted mean survival times (RMST) from adjusted Cox models. Survival benefit was calculated as net gain in life-years with LT. Pre-LT cohort included 2628 patients: median MELDNa was 18 (IQR 14-22); 731 (28%) were frail; 440 (17%) died pre-LT. Post-LT cohort included 1335 patients: median MELDNa was 20 (IQR 14-24); 325 (24%) were frail; 103 (8%) died post-LT. Pre-LT RMST decreased substantially as LFI increased. Post-LT RMST also decreased as LFI increased but only modestly. There was no LFI threshold at which pre-LT and post-LT RMST intersected-patients had net survival benefit at all LFI values. CONCLUSION: Pre-LT and, to a lesser degree, post-LT mortality increased as LFI increased. Transplant offered a survival benefit at all LFI values, driven by a reduction in pre-LT mortality. No threshold of LFI was identified at which the risk of post-LT mortality exceeded pre-LT mortality. LT offers net survival benefit even in the presence of advanced frailty among those selected for LT.

Patient-Reported Outcome Screens for Cognitive Dysfunction and Predicts Admissions in Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, leading to preventable hospitalizations and increased mortality. Despite the availability of validated neuro-psychometric tests to diagnose HE, only 10% of clinicians regularly screen for HE due to lack of time, equipment, and trained personnel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the association between patient-reported cognitive function and the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (a validated measure of HE) in patients with cirrhosis. A single-center prospective study of adult patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation was performed from 10/2020 to 12/2021. Cognition was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery and a brief Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey. RESULTS: Twenty-three liver transplantation candidates were enrolled; the mean age was 56.4 (±9.7) years, 39% were female and the most common etiologies of cirrhosis were primary biliary cirrhosis/primary sclerosing cholangitis/overlap syndrome (30%), hepatitis C (22%) and alcohol-associated liver disease (22%). The mean MELD-Na was 14.9 (±6.4). The mean PROMIS Cognitive Function T-score (PROMISCF) was 49.2 (±9.6). The mean T-scores for the List Sort Working Memory test, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention test, and Pattern Comparison Processing Speed test were 46.4 (±9.9), 37.8 (±6.2), and 50.22 (±16.4), respectively. PROMISCF correlated with the List Sort Working Memory test (r = 0.45, P = .03). The mean hospitalization rate was 1.6 days admitted per month. On adjusted multivariate analysis, PROMISCF predicted total hospitalization days (P < .001), hospital admissions (P = .01), and hospitalization rate (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A brief survey can screen for HE and predict hospitalizations in patients with cirrhosis.

Comparing Functional Frailty and Radiographic Sarcopenia as Predictors of Outcomes After Liver Transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. The ability to identify frail patients at risk of adverse outcomes could help optimize liver transplant (LT) evaluations and pre-transplant care. This study compared sarcopenia, via L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI), to frailty, via liver frailty index (LFI) and analyzed associated outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive LT-recipients with cross-sectional abdominal/pelvic imaging were reviewed over 5 years at a single transplant center. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients underwent transplant during this study interval; 31% of patients were sarcopenic. Two hundred eight patients underwent LFI evaluation: 25% were frail, 59% were prefrail, and 16% were robust. Sarcopenic patients had higher LFI scores indicating greater frailty (p = 0.02). Both sarcopenia and LFI-frailty were associated with significantly higher MELD-Na scores. Length of post-LT hospital stay was increased in sarcopenic (mean 14 vs. nonsarcopenic 11 days, p = 0.02) and LFI-frail patients (mean 13 vs. 10 prefrail, 8 robust, p = 0.04). As a categorical variable, neither LFI-frailty nor sarcopenia were significantly associated with reduced survival at 1-year (robust 100%, prefrail 93.5%, frail 91.1%, p = 0.31) (nonsarcopenic 94.4%, sarcopenic 91.4%, p = 0.30). However, LFI score was significantly associated with mortality at 1-year (OR 2.133, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic sarcopenia is a suitable proxy for in-person frailty assessment as both L3-PMI and LFI capture frail patients' pre-LT. However, physical assessment with frailty better predicts 1-year mortality post-LT than the measurement of muscle mass.

Impact of acute kidney injury response on survival and liver transplant rates in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: Results from the HRS-HARMONY consortium.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates the course of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and negatively affects their prognosis. How AKI response influences the timing of liver transplantation (LT) remains unclear. We sought to assess the impact of AKI response to treatment on survival and LT rates in cirrhosis patients awaiting LT. APPROACH & RESULTS: This was a retrospective multicenter study of cirrhosis patients waitlisted for LT and hospitalized with AKI in 2019. The exposure was AKI response versus no response during hospitalization. Outcomes were 90-day overall and transplant-free survival, and rates of LT with time to transplant. We adjusted for age, sex, race, cirrhosis etiology, site, and MELD-Na score. Among the 317 patients in this study, 170 had AKI response (53.6%), and 147 had no response (46.4%). Compared to non-responders, responders had better 90-day overall survival (89.4% vs. 76.2%, adjusted sHR for mortality 0.34, p=0.001), and transplant-free survival (63.5% vs. 25.2%, aHR for probability of death or transplant 0.35, p<0.001). The LT rate was lower in responders (45.9% vs. 61.2%, adjusted sHR 0.55, p=0.005). 79% of transplants in responders occurred after discharge, at a median of 103 days, while 62% of transplants in non-responders occurred during hospitalization, with the remainder occurring post-discharge at a median of 58 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis waitlisted for LT who are hospitalized with AKI, AKI response to therapy is associated with improved 90-day survival, despite a reduced LT rate and longer time to LT.

Clinically relevant cut-points for changes in the Liver Frailty Index are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Physical frailty is a critical determinant of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and can be objectively measured using the Liver Frailty Index (LFI), which is potentially modifiable. We aimed to identify LFI cut-points associated with waitlist mortality. Ambulatory adults with cirrhosis without HCC awaiting liver transplantation from 9 centers from 2012 to 2021 for ≥3 months with ≥2 pre-liver transplantation LFI assessments were included. The primary explanatory variable was the change in LFI from first to second assessments per 3 months (∆LFI); we evaluated clinically relevant ∆LFI cut-points at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5. The primary outcome was waitlist mortality (death or delisting for being too sick), with transplant considered as a competing event. Among 1029 patients, the median (IQR) age was 58 (51-63) years; 42% were female; and the median lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium at first assessment was 18 (15-22). For each 0.1 improvement in ∆LFI, the risk of overall mortality decreased by 6% (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001). ∆LFI was associated with waitlist mortality at cut-points as low as 0.1 (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87) and 0.2 (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). An improvement in LFI per 3 months as small as 0.1 in the pre-liver transplantation period is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in waitlist mortality. These data provide estimates of the reduction in mortality risk associated with improvements in LFI that can be used to assess the effectiveness of interventions targeting physical frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Utilizing a novel MRI technique to identify adverse muscle composition in end-stage liver disease: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia is a common complication of end-stage liver disease (ESLD), but its exact relationship to myosteatosis and frailty remains unclear. In this pilot study, we tested the feasibility of a specialized MRI protocol and automated image analysis in patients with ESLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center prospective study, adult liver transplant candidates with ESLD underwent assessment of muscle composition between 3/2022 and 6/2022 using the AMRA® MAsS Scan. The primary outcome of interest was feasibility of the novel MRI technique in patients with ESLD. We also tested if thigh muscle composition correlated with validated measures of frailty and sarcopenia. RESULTS: Eighteen subjects (71 % male, mean age 59 years) were enrolled. The most common etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol-related liver disease (44 %) and non-alcohol-associated fatty liver disease (33 %), with a mean MELD-Na of 13 (± 4). The mean time needed to complete the MRI protocol was 14.9 min and only one patient could not complete it due to metal hardware in both knees. Forty-one percent of patients had adverse muscle composition (high thigh fat infiltration and low-fat free muscle volume) and these patients were more likely to have undergone a recent large volume paracentesis (43 % vs. 0 %, p < 0.02). The adverse muscle composition group performed significantly worse on the 6-minute walk test compared to the remainder of the cohort (379 vs 470 m, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The AMRA® MAsS Scan is feasible to perform in patients with ESLD and can be used to quantify myosteatosis, a marker of muscle quality and potentially muscle functionality in ESLD.

Quality measures in pre-liver transplant care by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The result of ongoing liver injury - and disease, regardless of cause - is fibrosis, and fibrosis appears to be a critically important result of ongoing injury. Further, in a number of different liver diseases, the presence of fibrosis has prognostic value. Therefore, the assessment of fibrosis is of critical clinical importance. Given the importance of fibrosis, there has been a rapid evolution in the use of noninvasive liver tests. This review highlights a number of the core principles surrounding. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of noninvasive test has progressed rapidly over the last decade and data are rapidly accumulating. New terminology has been adapted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) for noninvasive assessment of liver disease and termed 'NILDA' (Non-Invasive Liver Disease Assessment). Blood based such as APRI and or FIB-4 and imaging tests such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have moderate to high degrees of accuracy for detection of advanced liver fibrosis (≥ F2) and even higher accuracy for detection of severe fibrosis (F4 or cirrhosis). NILDA are particularly effective at the ends of the liver disease spectrum. For example, a very low LSM (less than 7 kPa) essentially excludes significant fibrosis or portal hypertension, and a very high LSM (> 25 kPa) makes significant fibrosis with portal hypertension (cirrhosis) highly likely. SUMMARY: NILDA are currently front and center in terms of assessment of the severity of liver disease. In all patients with known or suspected liver disease, noninvasive blood tests, including APRI and or FIB-4, should be the initial choice to assess the severity of liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension. In most patients, these tests should be followed with imaging evaluation. The most commonly available imaging is LSM, which appears to be more accurate in predicting fibrosis severity, and is superior to blood tests in the assessment of portal hypertension. In situations in which there is diagnostic uncertainly, liver biopsy with or without HVPG remains an important consideration.

Imaging-based non-invasive liver disease assessment for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient elastography (TE), shear-wave elastography (SWE), and/or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), each providing liver stiffness measurement (LSM), are the most studied imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) techniques. To support the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines on NILDA, we summarized the evidence on the accuracy of these LSM methods to stage liver fibrosis (F). APPROACH AND RESULTS: A comprehensive search for studies assessing LSM by TE, SWE, or MRE for the identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), or cirrhosis (F4), utilizing histopathology as standard of reference by liver disease etiology in adults or children from inception to April 2022 was performed. We excluded studies with <50 patients with a single disease entity and mixed liver disease etiologies (with the exception of HCV/HIV co-infection). Out of 9447 studies, 240 with 61,193 patients were included in this systematic review. In adults, sensitivities for the identification of F2-4 ranged from 51% to 95%, for F3-4 from 70% to 100%, and for F4 from 60% to 100% across all techniques/diseases, whereas specificities ranged from 36% to 100%, 74% to 100%, and 67% to 99%, respectively. The largest body of evidence available was for TE; MRE appeared to be the most accurate method. Imaging-based NILDA outperformed blood-based NILDA in most comparisons, particularly for the identification of F3-4/F4. In the pediatric population, imaging-based NILDA is likely as accurate as in adults. CONCLUSION: LSM from TE, SWE, and MRE show acceptable to outstanding accuracy for the detection of liver fibrosis across various liver disease etiologies. Accuracy increased from F2-4 to F3-4 and was the highest for F4. Further research is needed to better standardize the use of imaging-based NILDA, particularly in pediatric liver diseases.

Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for non-invasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) in chronic liver disease (CLD). Our aims for this systematic review were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of selected blood-based tests either alone, or in combination, for identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4) and cirrhosis (F4), as compared to biopsy in CLD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We included a comprehensive search of databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Scopus through to April 2022. Two independent reviewers selected 286 studies with 103,162 patients. The most frequently identified studies included the simple aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis (FIB)-4 markers (with low-to-moderate risk of bias) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) and C virus (HCV), HIV-HCV/HBV co-infection, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Positive (LR+) and negative (LR) likelihood ratios across direct and indirect biomarker tests for HCV and HBV for F2-4, F3-4, or F4 were 1.66-6.25 and 0.23-0.80, 1.89-5.24 and 0.12-0.64, and 1.32-7.15 and 0.15-0.86 respectively; LR+ and LR for NAFLD F2-4, F3-4 and F4 were 2-65-3.37 and 0.37-0.39, 2.25-6.76 and 0.07-0.87, and 3.90 and 0.15 respectively. Overall, proportional odds ratio indicated FIB-4 <1.45 was better than APRI <0.5 for F2-4. FIB-4 >3.25 was also better than APRI >1.5 for F3-4 and F4. There was limited data for combined tests. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based biomarkers are associated with small-to-moderate change in pre-test probability for diagnosing F2-4, F3-4, and F4 in viral hepatitis, HIV-HCV co-infection, and NAFLD, with limited comparative or combination studies for other CLD.

Non-invasive liver disease assessment to identify portal hypertension: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

INTRODUCTION: Portal hypertension is a serious complication of cirrhosis, which leads to life-threatening complications. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), a surrogate of portal pressure, is the reference standard test to assess the severity of portal hypertension. However, since HVPG is limited by its invasiveness and by its availability, non-invasive liver disease assessments (NILDAs) to assess portal pressure, especially clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), are needed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from each database's inception to April 22 nd , 2022. We included only studies in English that examined ≥50 patients in single liver disease etiologies which compared non-invasive tests (blood, and/or imaging) to HVPG for predicting clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; defined as HVPG ≥10 mm Hg) in patients with chronic liver disease (this therefore limited the number of studies that could be included). Outcomes reported included measures of diagnostic test accuracy. Additionally, a narrative review of studies not eligible for the systematic review is also provided. RESULTS: Nine studies with 2,492 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was substantial heterogeneity with regard to liver disease studied and cutoff values used to detect CSPH. Blood based tests, including aspartate to platelet ratio index (APRI) (56% sensitivity and 68% specificity) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) (54% sensitivity and 73% specificity) had low accuracy measures. Imaging based tests (transient elastography (TE) and shear wave elastography detection of liver stiffness (LSM)) had better accuracy, but also had substantial variation; at 15 kPa, TE sensitivity was 90%-96% and specificity was 48%-50% while at 25 kPa, its sensitivity and specificity were 57%-85% and 82%-93%, respectively. The narrative review suggested that imaging based tests are the best available NILDA to detect CSPH, CSPH is highly unlikely to be present at an LSM ≤15 kPa and likely to be present at an LSM ≥25 kPa. CONCLUSION: While imaging-based NILDA appeared to have higher accuracy than blood-based tests to detect CSPH, only 9 studies fit the a priori established inclusion criteria for the SR. In addition, there was substantial study heterogeneity and variation in cutoffs for LSM to detect CSPH, limiting the ability to establish definitive cutoffs to detect CSPH.