Prospective Patient Preferences for Humor in Urologists Treating Erectile Dysfunction: A Survey Study.

INTRODUCTION: Men seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction can experience embarrassment as a result of stigma. This research manuscript presents the findings of a survey conducted to investigate the influence of humor on prospective patients' preferences when selecting a specialist to address erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: The respondents were presented with five pairs of mock urology business cards: one professional and one humorous. A questionnaire was designed and distributed via an online survey platform. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 29 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) to evaluate age and race associations with card preference. RESULTS: Among the 997 participants, an average of 66.1% (a median of 71.2%) preferred professional cards. Humorous card selection rates ranged from 5.2% to 38.4% compared to 54.0% to 78.1% for professional cards. A statistically significant relationship between age and professional card choice existed in all except the fifth set of cards (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, and 0.054). The relationship between race or ethnicity and business card preference was not reported due to an imbalance in demographics, with most participants identifying as Caucasian. DISCUSSION: A humor-centric approach may not resonate with all individuals seeking treatment for sensitive conditions such as ED. Limitations include the subjectivity of humor, the use of an online survey platform, and the hypothetical nature of this study. Real patients experiencing ED may face stigma and respond to humor differently. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into patient preference for professionalism over humor from their urologist but leaves room for the exploration of humor in medical contexts. Future studies could examine the impacts of humor on patient choices in real-world healthcare settings.

Prevalence of infertility and barriers to family building among male physicians.

BACKGROUND: Fertility declines with increasing age and physicians often delay childbearing beyond prime reproductive years for the sake of medical training. However, the risks of infertility in male physicians compared to the general population remain poorly studied. OBJECTIVES: To characterize rates of infertility among male physicians and identify barriers in access to fertility care and family building. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between June 2022 and December 2022, male physicians were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding fertility and family building. Surveys were disseminated electronically via social media and professional medical societies using Qualtrics (Provo, UT). RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five responses were included in the final analysis. The mean age of respondents was 36.3 ± 7.4 years. Of 151 respondents with children or currently attempting to have children, 66 (43.7%) delayed family building due to their medical training or career. The most influential factors affecting timing of children were lack of flexibility in schedule, lack of time, stress, and financial strain. Forty-three (18.3.%) respondents had seen a doctor for fertility evaluation; an additional 12 (5.1%) said they considered doing so but did not, mostly due to being too busy. Sixty (25.5%) had undergone semen testing in the past. Thirty-one (13.2%) reported a diagnosis of fertility issues in either themselves or their partner. Twenty-seven (11.5%) endorsed either them or their partner having undergone assistive reproductive technologies or other procedures for infertility. DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of male physicians delayed building their family or seeking fertility evaluation due to their medical career. Around 23.4% of male physicians have either seen or considered seeing a physician for fertility evaluation, suggesting a high prevalence of infertility in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a need for interventions to support family building and fertility evaluation and treatment among male physicians.

Prevalence of sexual dysfunction and pursuit of sexual medicine evaluation among male physicians-a survey.

We sought to characterize the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and barriers to treatment among male physicians. Between June and December 2022, male physicians were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding sexual function. Surveys were disseminated electronically via social media and professional medical societies using Qualtrics (Provo, UT). In totla, 235 responses were included in the final analysis. The mean age of respondents was 36.3 ± 7.4 years (range 23-72). 27 (11.5%) reported having seen a doctor for sexual health. Of these 27, 40.7% saw a physician for erectile dysfunction, 29.6% for low libido, 22.2% for premature ejaculation, 7.4% for delayed ejaculation, and 33.3% for other concerns. An additional 29 (12.3%) considered establishing care for sexual issues but didn't, mostly due to being too busy. 46 (19.6%) respondents reported having taken medication to improve erectile function. Therefore, in a cohort of young male physicians, 23.8% had seen or considered seeing a doctor for sexual health concerns, and nearly 1 in 5 had taken medication for erectile dysfunction. Male physicians appear to be at higher risk for sexual dysfunction than the general population and face significant and unique barriers in access to care for sexual dysfunction.

Misinformation About Orthopaedic Conditions on Social Media: Analysis of TikTok and Instagram.

Introduction Social media outlets such as TikTok (TT) and Instagram (IG) have surged as a method to disseminate information. More recently, healthcare professionals have targeted this space as a means to provide medical education and advice. With the ever-growing content on these applications, there is significant variability and quality of material available, which can lead to the dissemination of misinformation. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and popularity of content on common orthopaedic pathology on TT and IG. Methods Content on TT and IG related to six common orthopaedic conditions - achilles tendon tear, ACL tear, meniscus tear, tennis elbow, rotator cuff tear, and ankle sprains - was evaluated between April and June 2022. The top ten posts for the top two associated hashtags for each condition were reviewed. The quality of each post was analyzed using the DISCERN instrument, rating each on a scale of 1 to 5. Each post was characterized by the author's profession (physician, physical therapist, chiropractor, etc.) and content type (educational, testimonial, personal, promotional, and entertainment). Popularity and engagement metrics such as "comments," "likes," and "shares" were also collected. Results There were 165,666,490 views on TT and 9,631,015 views on IG amongst the six common aforementioned orthopaedic conditions. Content created by physicians had less overall engagement (16.1%) compared to content created by non-physicians (83.9%). The quality of content on average was low (mean misinformation index 2.04 ± 1.08 (1-5)1. Physician-created posts in comparison to non-physician posts were significantly more accurate (mean misinformation index score 3.38 ± 1.12 vs 1.89 ± 0.94, p<0.0001). Conclusions Common orthopaedic conditions such as Achilles tendon tears, ACL tears, and meniscus tears are frequently the focus of content posted on TT and IG; however, this information is often not medically accurate. Increased physician engagement may help to rectify this misinformation.

Predictors of Semen Parameters Decline Following the Microsurgical Varicocelectomy.

Objective Varicocele is considered the most common reversible cause of male infertility. However, some men do not clinically improve after surgical repair. We aimed to identify preoperative factors associated with decreased semen parameters and clinical "downgrading" of total motile sperm count (TMSC) following varicocelectomy. Methods We examined men with preoperative laboratory testing and pre- and postoperative semen analyses (SA) who underwent varicocelectomy between 2010 and 2020. Ejaculate volume, sperm motility, sperm concentration, TMSC, and clinical grade of TMSC (in vitro fertilization: <5M sperm, intrauterine insemination: 5-9M sperm, natural pregnancy: >9M sperm) were used to determine postoperative outcomes. Demographic and clinical factors were compared between cohorts. Results Among 101 men who underwent varicocelectomy, 35 (34.7%) had decreased postoperative TMSC with a median follow-up of 6.6 months (interquartile range 3.9-13.6 months). Eleven (10.9%) men experienced TMSC clinical "downgrading" following surgery. Clinical grade III varicocele was significantly associated with decreased sperm motility on postoperative SA (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.7-10.0, p=0.002), and larger left testicle volume (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p=0.02) was associated with clinical "downgrading" after varicocelectomy. Conclusion A small but significant proportion of men experienced a "downgrading" of semen parameters after varicocelectomy. Larger left testis size was associated with clinical downgrading, whereas clinical grade III varicoceles were associated with lower post-treatment sperm motility. These data are critical for preoperative patient counseling.

Do Articles Shared by Academic Medicine Social Media Influencers Drive Future Citation Rates?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of influential figures within social media (SoMe) in driving future citations. METHODS: All original articles published in the Journal of Urology and European Urology in 2018 were identified. For each article, number of mentions on any SoMe platform, article's Twitter reach, and total citations were collected. Article characteristics such as type of study, article topic, and open access status were identified. Total academic research output was obtained for first and last authors of included articles. Influential SoMe figures were defined as users that tweeted about included articles and had over 2000 followers. For these accounts, we collected total followers, total tweets, engagement statistics, verification status, and academic characteristics such as total citations and total prior publications. The impact of SoMe, article, and academic characteristics on future citations was assessed using panel data regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 394 articles with 8895 total citations and 460 SoMe influencers. On panel data regression modeling, tweets about a specific article were associated with future citations (0.17 citations per tweet about an article, P < .001). SoMe influencer characteristics were not associated with increased citations (P > .05). The following non-SoMe-associated characteristics were predictive of future citations (P < .001): study type (prospective studies received 12.9 more citations than cross-sectional studies), open access status (4.3 citations more if open access, P < .001), and previously well-published first and last authors. CONCLUSION: While SoMe posts are associated with increased visibility and higher future citation rates, SoMe influencers do not appear to drive these outcomes. Instead, high quality and accessibility were more predictive of future citability.

Compensated Hypospermatogenesis: Elevated Follicle-stimulating Hormone Predicts Decline in Semen Parameters Among Men With Normal Index Semen Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and normal semen analysis (SA) are more likely to experience a decline in semen parameters over time compared to men with normal FSH. METHODS: Men presenting for fertility evaluation between 2002 and 2020 with normal initial SA were dichotomized according to baseline FSH as normal (<7.6 IU/mL) vs elevated (≥7.6 IU/mL). Primary outcomes included the development of abnormal sperm concentration (<15 million/mL) and total motile sperm count <9 million. Secondary outcomes included abnormal sperm motility (<40%), morphology (<4%), and total number of SA abnormalities. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 858 men; 776 had normal FSH, and 82 had elevated FSH at presentation. Compared to men with normal FSH, men with elevated FSH had lower total motile sperm count (64.1 vs 107.3, P < .001) and higher testosterone levels (339 ng/dL vs 309 ng/dL, P = .03). At each follow-up timepoint, more men with elevated FSH had oligospermia compared to men with normal FSH. Men with elevated FSH were more likely to experience a decline in total motile sperm count below the intrauterine insemination threshold of 9 million and more likely to develop SA abnormalities over time. CONCLUSION: In men presenting for fertility evaluation with normal index SA, elevated FSH was associated with subsequent decline in semen parameters over time. Men with elevated FSH and normal SA, a condition we have termed compensated hypospermatogenesis, represent an at-risk population for whom close follow-up is warranted.

Guideline-Discordant Care Among Direct-to-Consumer Testosterone Therapy Platforms.

This cross-sectional study examines whether direct-to-consumer platforms provide guideline-concordant care regarding testosterone therapy.

The broad reach and inaccuracy of men's health information on social media: analysis of TikTok and Instagram.

Social media (SoMe) offers great potential to expand access to health information, but a significant proportion of users consume its content instead of consulting a physician. We sought to quantify the volume and characterize the accuracy of men's health-related content on TikTok and Instagram. We searched TikTok and Instagram for the terms: testosterone, erectile dysfunction, male infertility, semen retention, Peyronie's disease, and vasectomy. The top 10 hashtags for each term were used to estimate the total impressions for each term on each platform, and posts were then characterized by creator type, content type, and accuracy (1 to 5 scale). TikTok had 2,312,407,100 impressions and Instagram had 3,107,300 posts across all topics. Semen retention had the most impressions on TikTok (1,216,074,000) and posts on Instagram (1,077,000). Physicians created only a small portion of total TikTok and Instagram posts (10.3% and 12.9%, respectively). Across all topics, the accuracy of content was poor (2.6 ± 1.7), however, physician posts were more accurate than non-physician posts (mean 4.2 ± 1.2 vs 2.3 ± 1.6, p < 0.001, respectively). Men's health content is popular on TikTok and Instagram but is not accurate. We recommend that physicians actively engage in SoMe to address misinformation.

Elevated Endogenous Testosterone Levels are not Associated With Significant Clinical Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between elevated endogenous testosterone levels and deleterious effects associated with testosterone therapy. Elevated serum testosterone levels in men receiving testosterone therapy have been associated with side effects, though precise thresholds above which these occur are unknown. Data on the association between naturally elevated endogenous testosterone levels and their physiologic effects is sparse. METHODS: We examined National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data between 2011 and 2016, analyzing men aged 18 and older not on testosterone or androgen ablation therapy, excluding men who had testosterone <300 ng/dL, to compare men with elevated testosterone (>800 ng/dL) to men with normal testosterone (300-800 ng/dL). We used multivariable logistic and linear regressions for comparison. RESULTS: After excluding men with testosterone levels <300 ng/dL, 3673 men met inclusion criterion. Only 146 (4%) of men had a testosterone >800 ng/dL. When compared to men with normal testosterone, men with high testosterone had similar rates of sleep disorders, urinary symptoms, and depression. Men with elevated testosterone had higher hematocrit regression coefficient (ßi 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.90 P < .01), AST (ßi 8.48, 95% CI 0.31-16.66, P = .04) and ALT (ßi 12.23, 95% CI 0.70-23.77, P = .04) compared to men with normal testosterone. CONCLUSION: No association was found between higher endogenous testosterone levels and adverse events associated with testosterone therapy. Men with higher testosterone had increased hematocrit, but this was not clinically significant. This challenges what is considered a safe target for testosterone therapy and prompts future prospective studies to delineate the safety of elevated endogenous and exogenous modulated levels of testosterone.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Use is Not Associated With Impaired Semen Parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and semen quality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all men undergoing semen analysis (SA) for fertility evaluation from 2002-2020 at a single academic medical center. Men were excluded if they had prior exposure to spermatotoxic medications, clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or medical conditions known to impact male fertility. SSRI exposure was defined by an outpatient prescription within 90 days prior to any semen test. Differences between men with and without SSRI exposure were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables and chi-squared testing for proportions. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were fit to evaluate the relationship between SSRI use and individual semen parameters, controlling for age at the time of the semen analysis and non-SSRI drug use. RESULTS: A total of 8861 men were identified, of whom 153 men (1.7%) were exposed to SSRIs prior to SA. Median age was 35 years (interquartile range: 32-39) and was similar between groups (P = .999). Non-SSRI medication use was significantly higher in men taking SSRIs (78.4% vs 23.3%, < .001). On univariable and multivariable analyses, SSRI exposure was not associated with differences in semen volume, sperm concentration, motility, total motile sperm count, or normal morphology. CONCLUSION: In adult men undergoing fertility evaluation, SSRI exposure was not associated with impaired semen parameters. These data may help inform reproductive counseling and medical decision-making regarding SSRI use in men seeking paternity.

Adverse effects and potential benefits among selective androgen receptor modulators users: a cross-sectional survey.

Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a class of androgen receptor ligands that bind androgen receptors and display tissue selective activation of androgenic signaling. SARMs have selective anabolic effects on muscle and bone, and were originally synthesized for treatment of muscle wasting conditions, osteoporosis, breast cancer. To date, no SARM has been clinically approved and little is known about the beneficial effects and other adverse effects on users. We examined the adverse effects and potential benefits of SARMs amongst users. We performed an internet survey assessing the demographics of users via a 32-question survey. Using reddit as a platform, we distributed the survey through various subreddits that included potential SARMs users. Out of the 520 responses, 343 participants admitted having used SARMs. Most were males (98.5%), between the ages of 18-29 (72.3%). More than 90% of users acquired SARMs via the internet and did not consult with a physician. More than half of SARMs users experienced side effects including mood swings, decreased testicular size, and acne. More than 90% of men reported increased muscle mass and were satisfied with their SARMs usage. Despite having seemingly positive effects, more than 50% of SARMs users report significant adverse effects. Chi square was the main method of statistical analysis. Future studies should focus on comprehensive reproductive evaluation of men using SARMs.

The adverse impact of COVID-19 on men's health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to devastating health outcomes across the world. Initially thought to primarily affect the respiratory system, there is now clear and abundant evidence that COVID-19 can impact upon the male genitourinary system and overall men's health. In this review article, we explore the potential mechanisms by which COVID-19 specifically affects men and we review the literature examining the adverse effects of the disease on men's health. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies suggest that men are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 infection and death. COVID-19 infection has a negative impact on men's health including worsening semen parameters, potentially lower testosterone levels, and an increased risk of erectile dysfunction. SUMMARY: COVID-19 is a highly pathogenic virus that exerts adverse effects upon the male genitourinary system in myriad ways. The COVID-19 infection can impact serum testosterone, fertility, sexual function, and mental health. Fortunately, the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 infection and many of these sequelae.

Testosterone replacement therapy in the era of telemedicine.

The events of the 2019 SARS-CoV2 virus pandemic have all but ensured that telemedicine will remain an important aspect of patient care delivery. As health technologies evolve, so must physician practices. Currently, there is limited data on the management of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in the era of telemedicine. This review aims to explore the potential benefits and pitfalls of TRT management via telemedicine. We also propose a theoretical framework for TRT management via telemedicine. Telemedicine provides patients and physicians with a new mechanism for American Urological Association guideline-concordant TRT management that can increase patient access to care and provide a safe space for men who may otherwise not have been comfortable with in-person evaluation. However, there are significant limitations to the use of telemedicine for the management of TRT, including the inability to perform a physical exam, inability to administer specific medications, technological barriers, data security, and medical-legal considerations, and both patients and providers should engage in shared decision making before pursuing this approach. Understanding and acknowledging the potential pitfalls of telemedicine for TRT management will enable both patients and providers to achieve optimal outcomes and satisfaction.

Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a survey assessing the use of, attitudes towards, and perceived utility of social media (SoMe) in the 2021 urology residency match. METHODS: We distributed surveys to urology residency applicants and program directors (PDs) via the Urology Match 2021 Google Spreadsheet and email. The survey collected demographic information as well as SoMe activity, perceived pressure to use SoMe, match results, and attitudes regarding the utility of SoMe in the match process. RESULTS: A total of 108/528 (20%) applicants registered for the 2021 match and 61/142 (43%) PDs completed the survey. More applicants than PDs felt that SoMe helped them gain better insight into residency programs or applicants, respectively. Fewer applicants than PDs felt that SoMe activity provided a benefit to them in the match process. No significant relationship was found between SoMe viewing frequency, posting frequency, or tweetorial use with match outcomes. The majority of PDs believed that SoMe played a more important role in the 2021 match process than previous years while 15% and 12% reported that an applicant's SoMe activity helped or hurt the chances of matching to their program respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SoMe, particularly Twitter, was widely used in the 2021 match by both applicants and PDs. A majority of applicants and PDs believed that SoMe use aided them in some way in the match process, yet there was no relationship between the volume or type of applicant SoMe activity and match outcomes.

Urological Cancers and Kidney Transplantation: a Literature Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of urological malignancies in renal transplant recipients (RTR). RECENT FINDINGS: Although optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management in these patients remain controversial, adherence to general guidelines is recommended. Kidney transplantation is recognized as the standard of care for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as it offers prolonged survival and better quality of life. In the last decades, survival of RTRs has increased as a result of improved immunosuppressive therapy; nonetheless, the risk of developing cancer is higher among RTRs compared to the general population. Urological malignancies are the second most common after hematological cancer and often have more aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.

Analysis of the growing public interest in selective androgen receptor modulators.

To characterise trends and interest in selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). SARMs are androgen receptor ligands that bind androgen receptors selectively. SARMs have anabolic effects on muscle and bone and were originally synthesised for treatment of muscle wasting conditions, osteoporosis and breast cancer. To date, no SARM has been clinically approved and little is known about their beneficial effects and other adverse effects on users. We examined Google Trend searches of SARMs. Using Google Trends, we analysed how interest in SARMs has evolved over the last 15 years and compared it to trends in testosterone. Comparing 'TRT', 'SARMs' and 'Low Testosterone' together, we see low search interest in SARMs compared to TRT until February 2018, when the interest in both SARMs and TRT terms appear to be the same. Since February 2018, search interest for SARMs has surpassed search interest for both 'TRT' and 'Low Testosterone'. Trends for SARMs demonstrate a continuous increase over the years which has to date surpassed interest for both 'TRT' and 'low testosterone'. The rising interest in SARMs is concerning as the adverse effects of its usage, including its potential effects on fertility, have not been explored. Further investigation is necessary.