High-Grade Pleomorphic Sarcoma in Postauricular Keloid Scar After Surgical Excision and Radiation.

Keloid scars can cause significant morbidity to the patient including substantial cosmetic disfigurement, particularly in the head and neck region. Surgical excision followed by immediate postoperative radiation therapy has been shown to be more effective than single modality treatment. Radiation therapy increases risk for radiation-induced malignancy, though very few cases have been reported in the treatment of keloids. We report the case of a patient with a large postauricular keloid treated with excision and immediate post-operative radiation who developed a high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma in the scar bed. Laryngoscope, 2024.

Vascular events in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of vascular events in patients with head and neck cancer. REVIEW METHODS: Primary studies identified through April 2023. Meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 146 studies included in the systematic review. Rates of events were collected in the overall group, those with chemoprophylaxis, and those that underwent surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. Of 1 184 160 patients, 4.3% had a vascular event. Radiation therapy had highest risk of overall events and stroke when compared to surgery and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy had a higher risk of stroke and overall events when compared to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular events occur in 4%-5% of patients with head and neck cancer. Our data does not support the use of routine anticoagulation. Patients undergoing radiation therapy had the highest frequency of events.

Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT. DATA SOURCES: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.

The placebo effect in randomized-controlled trials of medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The placebo effect observed in clinical trials evaluating medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to characterize the placebo effect present within CRS outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Nursing (CINAHL) was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medical treatments for CRS versus placebo were included. We assessed patient-reported (sino-nasal outcome test 22 [SNOT-22], nasal obstruction, sense of smell, nasal obstruction visual analogue score [VAS], sense of smell VAS, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) and objective (Lund-Mackay Computed tomography (CT) score, peak nasal inspiratory flow [PNIF], nasal polyp scores, 40-item Smell Identification Test, serum IgE, and blood eosinophil levels) outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs were included, comprising 1437 patients (mean age 49.2 years). Biologics were the most common treatment investigated (n = 9). Eleven studies administered background steroids along with placebo. Following placebo administration, multiple patient-reported outcomes significantly decreased, including SNOT-22 (mean difference -9.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-11.26, -7.73]), nasal obstruction (-0.33 [-0.54, -0.13]), sense of smell (-0.22 [-0.33, -0.11]), nasal obstruction VAS (-2.47 [-2.87, -2.06]), and loss of smell VAS (-2.31 [-4.14, -0.47]) scores. For objective measures, significant changes occurred in Lund-Mackay CT score (-0.82, [-1.48, -0.16]) and PNIF (4.70, [4.76, 24.64]) with placebo. Placebo arms had the greatest impact when no background medications were used. CONCLUSIONS: Placebo treatments have a statistically and potentially clinically significant effect on patient-reported and some objective CRS outcomes. Further investigation is required to fully understand placebo effect, which could improve assessment of RCTs and impact patient care.

Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC. RESULTS: Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution. CONCLUSIONS: In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.

Preoperative Imaging in Patients with 22q11 Deletion Syndrome Undergoing Velopharyngeal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of preoperative imaging before velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) surgery in children with 22q11 Deletion Syndrome (22qDS) in evaluating internal carotid artery (ICA) medialization. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed. Studies of children with 22qDS who underwent preoperative imaging (MRA or CTA) to identify ICA anomalies were included. High-risk medialized ICAs were defined as either submucosal, retropharyngeal, Pfeiffer Grade III-IV, or <3 mm from the pharyngeal mucosa. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 398 patients with 22qDS (weighted mean age 7.6 years). In 372 patients with imaging, the rate of ICA medialization on imaging was 47.1% (95%CI 29.2-65.5), of which 46.3% (95%CI 27.4-65.8) were determined high risk. Operative plans were modified in 19.4% (95%CI 5.7-38.8) of 254 surgeries due to medialized ICA. In studies attempting to use nasopharyngoscopy pulsations to identify medialization for 214 patients, the true-positive rate was 53.9% (95%CI 27.5-79.2) and the false-positive rate was 16.2% (95%CI 7.9-26.8). Nine of eleven studies (81.8%) recommended universal preoperative imaging of the ICAs in children with 22qDS undergoing VPD surgery. No cases of perioperative bleeding secondary to ICA injury were identified. CONCLUSION: Although most studies endorse routine preoperative imaging to assess for ICA medialization in children with 22qDS undergoing VPD surgery, only a minority of these cases led to surgical modification. Additional studies are needed to compare outcomes in children with and without preoperative imaging given the low rates of ICA injury in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2023.