Surgical treatment of rhinophyma: Retrospective monocentric study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of rhinophyma consists primarily of destructive procedures. There is currently no consensus regarding treatment. In this study, we propose an algorithm based on a cohort of 25 patients and a literature review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 2016 and December 2018. The cosmetic outcome was evaluated by 2 independent assessors based on pre- and postoperative photographs. Patients were ranked according to the severity (mild, moderate, severe) of their rhinophyma. The different surgical methods used were cold blade excision or rhinoshave, electrosurgery or monopolar diathermy knife (MDK), and carbon dioxide laser (CO2 laser), either alone or in combination with another technique. All patients were contacted after the procedure to evaluate their satisfaction and to investigate for adverse effects. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included retrospectively: 7 with mild rhinophyma (5 were treated by MDK, 1 by fractional CO2 laser, and 1 by cold-blade excision and TCA solution), 11 with moderate rhinophyma (2 were treated by MDK, 9 by continuous CO2 laser), and 7 with severe rhinophyma (2 were treated by MDK, 5 by MDK plus CO2 laser). Cosmetic outcomes were deemed good or excellent in 80% of cases, and 84% of patients were fully satisfied with the result. We observed 5 cases of hypertrophic scarring, 2 cases of hypopigmentation, 3 cases of notching of the nasal ala, and 7 cases of prolonged erythema, most of which were caused by the MDK technique. CONCLUSION: A wide range of treatment options are available for rhinophyma. We suggest the use of cold-blade excision and trichloroacetic acid or fractional carbon dioxide laser for mild rhinophyma, continuous and pulsed CO2 laser for moderate rhinophyma, and MDK for severe rhinophyma.

[Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome should be considered in the event of diffuse erythema with fever and shock]. / Érythème généralisé fébrile et choc : choc toxinique staphylococcique.

BACKGROUND: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) was first described by Todd in 1978. The relevant Lancet publication reported 7 cases of children with fever, exanthema, hypotension and diarrhoea associated with multiple organ failure. An association between TSS and use of hyper-absorbent tampons in menstruating women was discovered in the 1980s. Following the market withdrawal of such tampons, TSS virtually disappeared. Herein we report a new case of TSS in a 15-year-old girl. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 15-year-old patient was admitted to intensive care for severe sepsis and impaired consciousness associated with diffuse abdominal pain. Dermatological examination revealed diffuse macular exanthema. Laboratory tests showed hepatic cytolysis (ASAT 101 U/L, ALAT 167 U/L, total bilirubin 68µmol/L) and an inflammatory syndrome. Lumbar puncture and blood cultures were sterile while thoraco-abdomino-pelvic and brain scans were normal. The patient was menstruating and had been using a tampon over the previous 24hours. Vaginal sampling and tampon culture revealed TSST-1 toxin-producing S. aureus. Management consisted of intensive care measures and treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and clindamycin for 10 days. CONCLUSION: In case of septic shock associated with diffuse macular exanthema a diagnosis of TSS must be envisaged, particularly in menstruating women.