The impact of an angiosome-targeted revascularization on healing rate, limb salvage and survival in critical limb threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: According to the angiosome concept ulcer healing and limb salvage should be superior if direct arterial flow to the source vessel of an affected angiosome is established compared to indirect flow where the angiosome is perfused by means of collaterals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of direct versus indirect revascularization (DR/IR) in endovascular versus bypass surgery on ulcer healing, limb salvage and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of both endovascular and bypass distal (below the knee) lower limb revascularizations for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) between 1993 and 2014 was performed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 126 endovascular and 198 bypass procedures. DR and IR were achieved in 57.4% and 42.6% limbs respectively. DR was not superior to IR regarding all three major endpoints when endovascular and bypass procedures were analyzed separately. Endovascular and bypass procedures resulted in comparable healing rates. All patients who did not achieve wound healing (HR 7.49; 95% CI 4.25-13.20, p = .0001) or needed to be treated with a bypass (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.05-3.05, p = .034) were at an increased risk for major amputation. Increased mortality rate was noted after endovascular procedures (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.04-2.00, p = .026). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study with comparable results for DR and IR did not support the angiosome concept. Achieving wound healing remains critical in patients with CLTI to reduce major amputation rates. Overall the implications of the angiosome concept seem to be limited due to its feasibility in patients with CLTI.

Anterior buttress plate is successful for treating posterior sterno-clavicular dislocation.

PURPOSE: Traumatic posterior instability of the sternoclavicular joint is a potentially life-threatening injury. In contrast to the low incidence there is a plethora of different strategies to treat this lesion. It was the objective of this retrospective analysis to evaluate and further develop current strategies. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis all posterior dislocations that were diagnosed and treated between 2011 and 2018 were included. In this 7 year period, eight male patients (median age 32 years) were operated. RESULTS: Three patients were not diagnosed at the primary institution and were referred later. Five patients were treated with an anterior buttress plate with clavicular stabilisation only. One patient was stabilized with a temporary sternoclavicular arthrodesis. Two patients were operated using an autologous tendon graft. All of the patients underwent an immediate postoperative CT-scan that documented the anatomical articulation. All patients treated with a plate underwent implant removal. A final CT examination after removal documented the maintenance of the anatomic alignment. CONCLUSIONS: The buttress plate technique with clavicular screw fixation is a sufficient treatment to restore and preserve a normal sternoclavicular alignment. The technique finds its indication in unidirectional posterior instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.