Estimation of forced vital capacity using speech acoustics in patients with ALS.

In this study, we present and provide validation data for a tool that predicts forced vital capacity (FVC) from speech acoustics collected remotely via a mobile app without the need for any additional equipment (e.g. a spirometer). We trained a machine learning model on a sample of healthy participants and participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to learn a mapping from speech acoustics to FVC and used this model to predict FVC values in a new sample from a different study of participants with ALS. We further evaluated the cross-sectional accuracy of the model and its sensitivity to within-subject change in FVC. We found that the predicted and observed FVC values in the test sample had a correlation coefficient of .80 and mean absolute error between .54 L and .58 L (18.5% to 19.5%). In addition, we found that the model was able to detect longitudinal decline in FVC in the test sample, although to a lesser extent than the observed FVC values measured using a spirometer, and was highly repeatable (ICC = 0.92-0.94), although to a lesser extent than the actual FVC (ICC = .97). These results suggest that sustained phonation may be a useful surrogate for VC in both research and clinical environments.

Emotional Reactivity as a Vulnerability for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures? Responses While Reliving Specific Emotions.

OBJECTIVE: Dysfunction in emotional processes is a hypothesized contributor to functional neurological disorders (FNDs), yet few studies have evoked real-time emotion during multimethod assessment incorporating subjective, behavioral, and psychophysiological indicators. This approach may reveal clinical and neurobiological vulnerability to FND and clarify how dysfunctional emotional processes serve as perpetuating factors. METHODS: Eleven participants with video-EEG-confirmed diagnoses of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) were compared with 49 seizure-free trauma control subjects (TCs) with or without clinically elevated posttraumatic stress symptoms (25 clinically elevated [TC-clin], 24 not clinically elevated [TC-nonclin]). Participants recalled and described memories evoking anger, shame, happiness, and neutral feelings. RESULTS: Even though PNES patients and TCs reported similar amounts of emotional experience, PNES patients reported more difficulty reliving emotions and were less likely to complete the relived shame task. During and after reliving happiness, PNES and TC-clin groups showed respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) decreases, indicating parasympathetic withdrawal, whereas the TC-nonclin group showed RSA increases. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot study are consistent with previous research and clinical observations that emotional engagement may be more effortful for PNES patients. Patterns of RSA change, which may also point to greater effortful engagement, were similar in PNES and TC-clin groups, suggesting that traumatic stress reactions may play a part. At the same time, experience of greater difficulty or avoidance may be even greater among PNES patients. Especially when regulatory resources are already limited, accumulated effort, coupled with self-threatening contexts such as shame, may be particularly problematic for those with PNES and perhaps other FNDs.

Diagnostic utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Considering sex differences.

Psychological assessment measures are frequently used to evaluate patients in epilepsy monitoring units. One goal of that assessment is to contribute information that may help with differential diagnosis between epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is one such measure. Del Bene et al. (2017) recently published an analysis that was the first to compare MMPI-2-RF scale elevations between diagnostic groups stratified by sex. The purpose of the present study was to replicate that analysis in a larger sample. Similar to previous work, we found that both men and women with PNES were more likely than men and women with epilepsy to report high levels of somatic complaints (2 to 5 times greater odds of somatic symptom reporting) and a variety of types of complaints. Mood disturbance scales were not significantly elevated in our PNES sample. Results contribute to the small body of research on sex differences in patients with PNES and suggest that somatization is a key characterization across sexes.