123I-Iofluopane Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography as an Imaging Biomarker of Pre-Synaptic Dopaminergic System after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Dopaminergic (DA) system function is frequently disrupted after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, published interventions that target the DA system with the hope of enhancing functional outcomes are inconclusive, partially because of the lack of DA signaling biomarkers that can be used to select patients likely to benefit from DA-directed therapies or to monitor treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 123I-iofluopane single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) to assess pre-synaptic DA system dysfunction after severe TBI. Eighteen patients with severe TBI were enrolled in this study. 123I-iofluopane SPECT imaging was performed at baseline and again 2.5 h after a single dose of methylphenidate (MP) administered enterally. DA transporter (DAT) specific binding ratio (SBR) before and after MP was measured. Functional outcomes included the Disability Rating Scale, JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. Thirteen of 18 patients completed the study. Average time from injury to SPECT scan was 48 days (standard deviation [SD], 24 days; median, 31). Baseline ioflupane striatal SBR was 1.51 ± 0.46 (median, 1.67). A 43.1% (SD, 16; median, 46.5) displacement of ioflupane from pre-synaptic DAT was observed after MP administration. Baseline SBR positively correlated with functional status at baseline and 4 weeks after completion of the study. Serum MP levels correlated with relative change in SBR (rs = 0.60; p = 0.04). Our findings suggest that 123I-iofluopane SPECT is a promising tool to determine the severity of pre-synaptic DA terminal disruption and for monitoring pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic interventions targeting the DA system.

Phase 2 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) During Rehabilitation From Traumatic Brain Injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability, but there are currently no therapies with proven efficacy for optimizing regeneration of repair during rehabilitation. Using standard stimulation tests, as many as 40-50% of survivors of severe TBI have deficiency of one or more pituitary hormones. Of these, the somatotropic axis is the most commonly affected, with Growth Hormone (GH) deficiency affecting ~20% of persons with severe TBI. Treatment with recombinant human Growth Hormone (rhGH) is generally effective in reversing the effects of acquired GH deficiency, but there is no evidence documenting functional or neurocognitive improvement after GH replacement in TBI patients. As a consequence, screening for GH deficiency and GH replacement when deficiency is found is not routinely performed as part of the rehabilitation of TBI survivors. Given that most of the recovery after TBI occurs within the first 6-12 months after injury and IGF-1 and GH are part of a coordinated restorative neurotrophic system, we hypothesized that patients will optimally benefit from GH therapy during the window of maximal neuroregenerative activity. We performed a Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility trial of recombinant human Growth Hormone (rhGH), starting at discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit, with follow up at 6 and 12 months. Our primary hypothesis was that treatment with rhGH in the subacute period would result in improved functional outcomes 6 months after injury. Our secondary hypothesis proposed that treatment with rhGH would increase IGF-1 levels and be well tolerated. Sixty-three subjects were randomized, and 40 completed the trial. At baseline, there was no correlation between IGF-1 levels and peak GH levels after L-arginine stimulation. IGF-1 levels increased after rhGH treatment, but it took longer than 1 month for levels to be higher than for placebo-treated patients. rhGH therapy was well-tolerated. The rhGH group was no different from placebo in the Disability Rating Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, or neuropsychological function. However, a trend toward greater improvement from baseline in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was noted in the rhGH treated group. Future studies should include longer treatment periods, faster titration of rhGH, and larger sample sizes.

The impact of preexisting illness and substance use on functional and neuropsychological outcomes following traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem in the US. Specific preexisting medical illnesses delay recovery after TBI and increase mortality or risk of repeat TBI. This study examined the impact of preexisting illness and substance use on patient rehabilitation outcomes following TBI. The Functional Independence Measure total score and Disability Rating Scale score measured functional outcomes at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, while the Trail Making Test A and B and Total Trials 1-5 of the California Verbal Learning Test-II measured neuropsychological outcomes in 128 TBI survivors with moderate or severe TBI. Results showed that the presence of a heart condition or diabetes/high blood sugar was associated with lower functional outcomes by discharge. A history of a heart condition, stroke, or respiratory condition prior to TBI was associated with reduced cognitive flexibility. Those with preexisting diabetes/high blood sugar demonstrated poorer visual attention, visuomotor processing speed, and ability to learn and recall verbal information. Those with pre-TBI cancer also had greater auditory-verbal memory deficits. The findings showed that specific preexisting medical conditions are independently associated with lower functional and cognitive outcomes for patients with TBI. By screening patients for preexisting medical conditions, multidisciplinary TBI rehabilitation teams can identify patients who require more aggressive treatments or greater length of stay.

Variations in Inpatient Rehabilitation Functional Outcomes Across Centers in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study and the Influence of Demographics and Injury Severity on Patient Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient functional outcomes across Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) rehabilitation centers using an enhanced statistical model and to determine factors that influence those outcomes. DESIGN: Multicenter observational cohort study. SETTING: TBIMS centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to 19 TBIMS rehabilitation centers from 2003-2012 (N=5505). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcomes of patients with TBI. RESULTS: Individuals with lower functional status at the time of admission, longer duration of posttraumatic amnesia, and higher burden of medical comorbidities continued to have worse functional outcomes at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and at the 1-year follow-up, whereas those who were employed at the time of injury had better outcomes at both time periods. Risk-adjusted patient functional outcomes for patients in most TBIMS centers were consistent with previous research. However, there were wide performance differences for a few centers even after using more recently collected data, improving on the regression models by adding predictors known to influence functional outcomes, and using bootstrapping to eliminate confounds. CONCLUSIONS: Specific patient, injury, and clinical factors are associated with differences in functional outcomes within and across TBIMS rehabilitation centers. However, these factors did not explain all the variance in patient outcomes, suggesting a role of some other predictors that remain unknown.

Effect of Obesity on Motor Functional Outcome of Rehabilitating Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the association between obesity and functional motor outcome of patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: This retrospective study at an urban acute inpatient rehabilitation center screened data from 761 subjects in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System who were admitted from January 2010 to September 2013. Inclusion criteria consisted of age of 18 years or older and an abnormal Functional Independence Measure motor score. Body mass index was used to determine obesity in the study population. Patients with a body mass index of 30.0 kg/m or greater were considered obese. RESULTS: A total of 372 subjects met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Of these, 54 (13.2%) were obese. Both obese and nonobese patients showed similar improvement in Functional Independence Measure motor score (mean [SD], 30.4 [12.8] for the obese patients, P = 0.115, and 27.3 [13.1] for the nonobese patients). The mean (SD) Functional Independence Measure motor scores at discharge for the obese and nonobese patients were 63.0 (12.6) and 62.3 (10.1) (P = 0.6548), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity had no adverse impact on motor functional outcomes of the traumatic brain injury patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation. Therefore, obesity should not be considered an obstacle in inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury, if patients are able to participate in necessary therapy.

Comparative effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: differential outcomes across TBI model systems centers.

OBJECTIVE: To measure patient functional outcomes across rehabilitation centers. SETTING: Traumatic Brain Injury Model System (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to 21 TBIMS rehabilitation centers (N = 6975, during 1999-2008). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. MAIN MEASURES: Center-specific functional outcomes of TBI patients using Functional Independence Measure, Disability Rating Scale, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. RESULTS: There were large differences in patient characteristics across centers (demographics, TBI severity, and functional deficits at admission to rehabilitation). However, even after taking those factors into account, there were significant differences in functional outcomes of patients treated at different TBIMS centers. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in functional outcomes of TBI patients across rehabilitation centers.