RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The largest outbreak of Legionnaires Disease (LD) in the UK for a decade occurred in Edinburgh in June 2012. We describe the clinical and public health management of the outbreak. SETTING: Three acute hospitals covering an urban area of ~480,000. METHODS: Data were collected on confirmed and suspected cases and minutes of the Incident Management Team meetings were reviewed to identify key actions. RESULTS: Over 1600 urine samples and over 600 sputum samples were tested during the outbreak. 61 patients with pneumonia tested positive for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 by urinary antigen detection, culture, respiratory PCR or serology. A further 23 patients with pneumonia were treated as suspected cases on clinical and epidemiological grounds but had no microbiological diagnosis. 36% of confirmed and probable cases required critical care admission. Mean ICU length of stay was 11.3 (±7.6) days and mean hospital length of stay for those who were admitted to ICU was 23.0 (±17.2) days. For all hospitalized patients the mean length of stay was 15.7 (±14) days. In total there were four deaths associated with this outbreak giving an overall case fatality of 6.5%. Hospital and critical care mortality was 6.1% and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients required prolonged multiple organ support or complex ventilation. Case fatality compared favourably to other recent outbreaks in Europe. Access to rapid diagnostic tests and prompt antibiotic therapy may have mitigated the impact of pre-existing poor health among those affected.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Surtos de Doenças , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Doença dos Legionários/terapia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Escócia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the combination of propofol and remifentanil for sedation to reduce shoulder dislocations in an ED. METHODS: Eleven patients with anterior glenohumeral dislocation were given propofol 0.5 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg iv over 90 seconds and then further doses of 0.25 mg/kg and 0.25 microg/kg, respectively, if needed. Another practitioner attempted reduction using the Milch technique. RESULTS: Reduction was achieved in all patients within four minutes of giving sedation (range 0.3-4; mean 1.6). Seven required one attempt at shoulder reduction, three required two attempts, and one required three attempts. Mean time to recovery of alert status was three minutes (range 1-6). The mean pain score during the reduction was 1.7 out of 10 (range 0-5). Nine patients had full recall, one had partial recall, and one had no recall at all. Eight patients were "very satisfied" with the sedation and three were "satisfied". There were no respiratory or haemodynamic complications that required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol and remifentanil provide excellent sedation and analgesia for the reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation, enabling rapid recovery.
Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/métodos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Piperidinas , Propofol , Luxação do Ombro/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Rememoração Mental/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , RemifentanilRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are scarce data describing the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of adults who suffer a suspected first seizure. AIM: To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of adults with a suspected first seizure who are referred to a teaching hospital first seizure clinic over a one year period. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive adults referred to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh between 4 February 2003 and 10 February 2004. RESULTS: 232 patients were referred to the first seizure clinic. Median age was 32 years; 53% of patients were male. Lower socioeconomic groups were more likely to present with a suspected first seizure. Nineteen per cent of patients were admitted to hospital after their suspected seizure episode. Appropriate driving advice was reported in 64% of cases. Seventy two per cent of patients were offered a first seizure clinic appointment within six weeks of referral. Nine per cent of patients had a subsequent seizure while awaiting review. Fifty two per cent of patients were confirmed as having a first seizure at the clinic, of which 56% were provoked by alcohol, recreational drugs, or sleep deprivation. Electroencephalography and computed tomography of the brain were the most common investigations ordered at the first seizure clinic (22% and 22% of patients respectively). CONCLUSION: Adults who suffer a suspected first seizure, and who make a full neurological recovery, can be safely managed as an outpatient. Around half of these patients will have a specialist diagnosis of first seizure and alcohol will be a common precipitating factor.
Assuntos
Convulsões/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Eletrocardiografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Tratamento de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Convulsões/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
A literature review of first seizures in adults was performed and a management algorithm was constructed. This review highlights the importance of a thorough history and examination, routine biochemistry and haematology, an electrocardiogram, selected neuroimaging, discharge planning with driving and lifestyle advice, and follow-up in a specialist clinic.
Assuntos
Convulsões/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Condução de Veículo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Emergências , Testes Hematológicos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
AIM: To assess whether an airway assessment score based on the LEMON method is able to predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the resuscitation room of a UK teaching hospital between June 2002 and September 2003 were assessed on criteria based on the LEMON method. At laryngoscopy, the Cormack and Lehane grade was recorded. An airway assessment score was devised and assessed. RESULTS: 156 patients were intubated during the study period. There were 114 Cormack and Lehane grade 1 intubations, 29 grade 2 intubations, 11 grade 3 intubations, and 2 grade 4 intubations. Patients with large incisors (p<0.001), a reduced inter-incisor distance (p<0.05), or a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance (p<0.05) were all more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view (grade 2, 3, or 4). Patients with a high airway assessment score were more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view compared with those patients with a low airway assessment score (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An airway assessment score based on criteria of the LEMON method is able to successfully stratify the risk of intubation difficulty in the emergency department. Patients with a poor laryngoscopic view (grades 2, 3, or 4) were more likely to have large incisors, a reduced inter-incisor distance, and a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance. They were also more likely to have a higher airway assessment score than those patients with a good laryngoscopic view.