Utility of scores to predict alcohol use after liver transplant (lt): take them with a grain of salt.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The Sustained Alcohol use post-Liver Transplant (SALT) and the High-Risk Alcohol Relapse (HRAR) scores were developed to predict return to alcohol use after liver transplant (LT) for alcohol associated liver disease (ALD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of deceased donor LT 10/2018 to 4/2022 was performed. All patients (pts) underwent careful pre-LT psychosocial evaluation. Data on alcohol use, substance abuse, prior rehabilitation, and legal issues were collected. Post-LT, all were encouraged to participate in rehabilitation programs and underwent interval phosphatidylethanol (PeTH) testing. Pts with ALD were stratified by < or > 6 month sobriety prior to listing. Those with <6 month were further stratified as acute alcoholic hepatitis (AH) by NIAAA criteria and non-AH. The primary outcome was utility of the SALT (<5 vs. ≥5) and HRAR (<3 vs. ≥3) scores to predict return to alcohol use (+PeTH) within 1 year after LT. RESULTS: Of the 365 LT, 86 had > 6 month sobriety and 85 had <6 month sobriety; 41 with AH and 44 non-AH. In those with AH, the mean time of abstinence to LT was 58 days, and 71% failed prior rehabilitation. Following LT, return to drinking was similar in the AH (24%) compared to <6M non-AH (15%) and >6M ALD (22%). Only 4% had returned to heavy drinking. The accuracy of both the SALT and HRAR scores to predict return to alcohol was low (accuracy 61-63%) with poor sensitivity (46% and 37%), specificity (67-68%), positive predictive value (22-26%) with moderate negative predictive value (NPV) (81-83%), respectively with higher NPVs (95%) in predicting return to heavy drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Both SALT and HRAR scores had good NPV in identifying patients at low risk for recidivism.

Gut-Liver-Brain Axis and Alcohol Use Disorder: Treatment Potential of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Chronic alcohol use is a major cause of liver damage and death. In the United States, multiple factors have led to low utilization of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder (AUD), including lack of provider knowledge and comfort in prescribing medications for AUD. Alcohol consumption has direct effects on the gut microbiota, altering the diversity of bacteria and leading to bacterial overgrowth. Growing evidence suggests that alcohol's effects on the gut microbiome may contribute to increased alcohol consumption and progression of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). This article reviews human and preclinical studies investigating the role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in ameliorating alcohol-associated alterations to the liver, gut, and brain resulting in altered behavior; it also discusses the therapeutic potential of FMT. SEARCH METHODS: For this narrative review, a literature search was conducted in September 2022 of PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between January 2012 and September 2022. Search terms used included "fecal microbiota transplantation" and "alcohol." SEARCH RESULTS: Most results of the literature search were review articles or articles on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; these were excluded. Of the remaining empirical manuscripts, very few described clinical or preclinical studies that were directly investigating the effects of FMT on alcohol drinking or related behaviors. Ultimately, 16 studies were included in the review. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The literature search identified only a few studies that were directly investigating the effect of FMT on ALD or alcohol drinking and related behaviors. Largely proof-of-concept studies, these findings demonstrate that alcohol can alter the gut microbiome and that the microbiome can be transferred between humans and rodents to alter affective behaviors frequently associated with increased alcohol use. Other studies have shown promise of FMT or other probiotic supplementation in alleviating some of the symptoms associated with ALD and drinking. These results show that the implementation of FMT as a therapeutic approach is still in the investigatory stages.

A comparison of career plans of gastroenterology fellows compared to fellows in other internal medicine subspecialties.

Background: The career trajectory of medical professionals, particularly in specialized fields like gastroenterology, can significantly impact healthcare and research. This study aimed to analyze career choices among gastroenterology fellows in the US and investigate the factors influencing these choices. Methods: We utilized data from the American Medical Association on internal medicine subspecialty fellows. The study examined career plans of gastroenterology fellows and compared them with those of other subspecialties. A chi-square test was performed to assess differences in career choices and practice settings. Results: Among gastroenterology fellows, 46% opted for private practice, 28% pursued further training, and 26% chose academia. Notably, gastroenterology fellows were more inclined toward private practice than their counterparts in other subspecialties (46.3% vs 38.4%) and were less likely to pursue academic careers (25.6% vs 30.7%). Conclusion: This study highlights a concerning trend among recent gastroenterology fellowship graduates favoring private practice over academic careers or additional training. To sustain and strengthen academic medicine in gastroenterology, interventions such as scholarships, mentorship programs, and loan repayment initiatives tailored to academic pursuits could play a crucial role.

Gastroenterology fellowship application and match trends in the United States over a 12-year period, 2010 to 2022.

Introduction: Gastroenterology has recently gained prominence as a competitive internal medicine subspecialty. The intense competition within the gastroenterology fellowship match (GFM) presents challenges for both applicants and programs, particularly in virtual interviews due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed the variables impacting GFM competitiveness to provide insights for prospective gastroenterologists and programs to enhance the match process. Methods: We used publicly available National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data to examine applications and match data for internal medicine subspecialties from 2010 to 2022. We considered factors such as the number of positions, applicants, and programs, utilizing the specialty competitiveness ratio (SCR) to assess competitiveness. Annual growth rates for positions and applications and average annual growth rates were calculated. Correlation coefficients between annual salaries and SCR were computed using various compensation reports. Results: GFM's competitiveness has increased recently, evidenced by substantial growth in positions (4.61%) and applications (3.81%) since 2010. Gastroenterology ranked as the second-fastest growing specialty in positions and applications. In 2022, GFM ranked fourth in applications (974) and positions offered (616). Among internal medicine subspecialties, gastroenterology exhibited the highest SCR (1.58). Correlation analysis highlighted a positive link between SCR and compensation across specialties. Conclusion: The escalating competition within GFM necessitates an expansion of positions to address potential shortages. Complex factors, such as academic interest and financial considerations, require multifaceted strategies to ensure an adequate supply of gastroenterologists. Further research is warranted to examine the long-term consequences of this trend.

Racial disparities in COVID-19 and gastrointestinal diseases-related mortality: analysis from CDC-WONDER databases, 2020-2022.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented global health challenge. Gastrointestinal diseases (GID) have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients, warranting a comprehensive investigation of their combined impact and racial disparities in mortality rates within the United States. Methods: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) mortality statistics database were analyzed for the period from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. This study focused on adults, considering all deaths related to COVID-19 and GID. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 population were reported. Sociodemographic data, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and region of residence, were collected. Results: Among 9,925,729 total deaths in the US between 2020 and 2022, 3.9% were GID related only, 9.6% were COVID-19 related only, and 0.4% were attributed to both COVID-19 and GID as underlying causes of death. AAMR for COVID-19 was 121.3 per 100,000, significantly higher than the AAMR for GID (50.3 per 100,000). Age-wise, elderly individuals had the highest AAMR for both COVID-19 and GID-related deaths. Stratified by race/ethnicity, Hispanics exhibited the highest AAMR, nearly twice that of Non-Hispanic Black patients and substantially higher than Non-Hispanic White and Asian patients. Conclusion: Our findings reveal substantial disparities in race/ethnicity-specific AAMR associated with both COVID-19 and GID in the US. Further research is crucial to delve deeper into their root causes and develop targeted interventions to strive for health equity for all.

Liver transplantation for people of minoritised sexual and gender identities in the USA.

The number of people who report to be of minoritised sexual or gender identities in the USA, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexuality-diverse and gender-diverse identities, has been increasing in the past decade. This diverse and unique population continues to experience not only health disparities but also psychosocial, economic, and legal disparities in accessing and receiving health care, including liver transplantations. As liver transplantation is life-saving for people with end-stage liver disease, understanding the factors that can affect access to and quality of liver transplantation care in people of minoritised sexual and gender identities in the USA, including differential social supports, insurance coverage, and medical and psychiatric comorbidities, is crucial. Actions, such as collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data, implementing inclusive language, recognising implicit biases, building diverse teams, providing a safer environment, and supporting further research to understand the unique health challenges are needed to ensure equitable access to high-quality liver transplantation care for people of minoritised sexual and gender identities.

Current Pharmacologic Therapies for Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) can occur in patients with cirrhosis and ascites due to splanchnic vasodilation, renal hypoperfusion, and vasoconstriction. HRS is a diagnosis of exclusion and portends a poor prognosis, with upward of 80% mortality at 2 weeks without treatment. This review will highlight randomized controlled trials for HRS pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A PubMed review of randomized controlled trials conducted over the past 25 years was undertaken; 18 studies were included. RESULTS: Initial studies showed that norepinephrine is as effective as terlipressin for HRS reversal. Midodrine with octreotide and albumin is less effective than terlipressin but better than albumin alone at improving 30-day mortality. Recently, terlipressin with albumin led to significantly higher rates of HRS reversal compared to albumin alone. Non-response to terlipressin can predict 90-day mortality in acute-on-chronic-liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our current understanding of HRS treatment is improved by recent randomized clinical trials. Previous studies using varying medication doses along with the "old" definition of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS type 1) rather than HRS-AKI means that there is still a need for future multicenter prospective studies further refining the risk-benefit ratio of vasoconstrictors for HRS-AKI patients. The Food and Drug Administration has approved terlipressin for use in September 2022. Because it will take time to adapt into clinical practice, less cost-prohibitive vasoconstrictors should still be considered. Opportunities also exist to clarify the safety, timing of initiation, as well as possible discontinuation of terlipressin.

The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation: challenges and perspectives.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unique challenges to patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplant, with respect to accessing medical facilities for routine clinic visits, imaging, laboratory workup, or endoscopies. There was a delay in organ procurement that led to a decrease in the number of liver transplants (LTs) and an increase in the morality of waitlisted patients at the beginning of the pandemic. LT numbers later equalized to pre-pandemic numbers due to combined efforts and adaptability of transplant centers as well as dynamic guidelines. Due to being immunosuppressed, the demographics of LT patients were at an increased risk of infection. Although there is a higher rate of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease, LT itself is not a risk factor for mortality in COVID-19. There was no difference in overall mortality in LT patients compared to non-LT patients, and mortality risk factors were the same: age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The most common causes of death were respiratory complications. Liver-related deaths were reported in 1.6% of patients. The optimal timing of liver transplantation post-infection depends on various factors, such as the severity of liver injury, the presence of comorbidities, and the progression of the underlying liver disease. There is not enough data available on COVID-19 cholangiopathy and the number of cases that will be seen in the future that will require LT. There are some concerns of lower immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in LT patients but available evidence suggests that the vaccines are safe and well-tolerated.

Prevalence and dynamics of NAFLD-associated fibrosis in people living with HIV in Vienna from first presentation to last follow-up.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is frequent in people living with HIV (PLWH) and may be aggravated by metabolic comorbidities and antiretroviral therapy (ART)-associated adverse effects. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed epidemiological, clinical and laboratory parameters and ART regimens at HIV diagnosis (BL) and at last follow-up (FU) in 1458 PLWH without viral hepatitis coinfection attending our HIV clinic in 2014-2016. Fibrosis was non-invasively assessed by the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). RESULTS: The median age of subjects was 37.8 years, 77.4% were male and 67.2% on ART, median CD4+ count was 356.0 cells/µL. At BL, 503 (34.5%) and 20 (1.4%) PLWH had dyslipidemia and diabetes, respectively. According to the NFS 16 (1.3%) showed advanced fibrosis (NFS ≥ 0.676), among which 1 (6.3%) had diabetes, 7 (43.8%) had dyslipidemia, and 5 (31.3%) were on HIV-protease inhibitors (PI). In addition, 191(15.1%) had intermediate NFS results, while fibrosis was ruled out (NFS ≤ 1.455) in 1065 (83.7%) PLWH. After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 590 (42.8%) had dyslipidemia and 61 (4.4%) had diabetes. Also, 21 (1.6%) showed advanced fibrosis, of which 10 (47.6%) had diabetes, 4 (19.0%) had dyslipidemia, and 9 (42.9%) were on PI-based ART, 223 (17.4%) had intermediate NFS results, while 1039 (81.0%) showed no fibrosis. CONCLUSION: During FU, advanced NAFLD fibrosis occurred in 1.3-1.6% of PLWH. Dyslipidemia, diabetes, and PI-based ART were associated with advanced NAFLD fibrosis. Prospective investigations of NAFLD severity and risk factors in PLWH are warranted.

QuickStroop, a Shortened Version of EncephalApp, Detects Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy With Similar Accuracy Within One Minute.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) is associated with poor outcomes but is often not diagnosed because of the time requirement. Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is the gold standard against which EncephalApp Stroop has been validated. However, EncephalApp (5 runs each in "Off" and "On" state) can take up to 10 minutes. This study sought to define the smallest number of EncephalApp runs needed for comparable accuracy to the total EncephalApp using CHE on PHES as gold standard. METHODS: A derivation and a validation cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis who underwent PHES (gold standard) and total EncephalApp was recruited. Data were analyzed for individual runs versus total EncephalApp time versus PHES-CHE. The derivation cohort (n = 398) was split into training (n = 299) and test (n = 99) sets. From the training data set a regression model was created with age, gender, education, and various sums of the "Off" settings. After this, a K-fold cross-validation on the test dataset was performed for both total EncephalApp time and individual Off runs and for the validation cohort. RESULTS: In both cohorts, Off runs 1 + 2 had statistically similar area under the receiver operating curve and P value to the total EncephalApp for PHES-CHE prediction. The adjusted (age, gender, education) regression formula from the derivation cohort showed an accuracy of 84% to diagnose PHES-CHE in the validation cohort. Time for CHE diagnosis decreased from 203.7 (67.82) to 36.8 (11.25) seconds in the derivation and from 178.2 (46.19) to 32.9 (9.94) seconds in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: QuickStroop, which is completed within 1 minute, gives an equivalent ability to predict CHE on the gold standard compared with the entire EncephalApp time.

Approach to the patient with decompensated cirrhosis and aortic stenosis during liver transplantation evaluation.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease and is reported to be present in 2%-7% of people over the age of 65. Risk factors for aortic stenosis and NASH overlap; thus, as the population ages, there is an increased likelihood that patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation may have severe aortic stenosis. There is a high mortality rate associated with cardiac surgeries in patients with cirrhosis. Further, there are no guidelines that assist in the decision making process for patients with cirrhosis and AS. In this review, we highlight key studies that compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with cirrhosis. We propose an algorithm as to how to approach the patient with aortic stenosis and considerations unique to patients with cirrhosis (i.e., anticoagulation, EGD for variceal assessment; need to determine timing after TAVI before listing).

Use of doppler ultrasound to predict need for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to treat complications of portal hypertension, such as ascites and variceal bleeding (VB). While liver doppler ultrasound (DUS) is used to assess TIPS patency, trans-shunt venography (TSV) is the gold standard. AIM: To determine the accuracy of DUS to assess TIPS dysfunction and for need for revision. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients referred for TIPS revision from 2008-2021. Demographics, DUS parameters at baseline and at the DUS preceding TIPS revision, TSV data were collected. Receiver operating characteristics curves, sensitivity, specificity, performance for doppler to predict need for revision were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to predict clinical factors associated with need for TIPS revision. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 89 patients with cirrhosis (64% men, 76% white, 31% alcohol as etiology); median age 59 years. Indication for initial TIPS were VB (41%), refractory ascites (51%), and other (8%). TIPS was revised in 44%. On univariate analysis, factors associated with need for TIPS revision were male (P = 0.03), initial indication for TIPS (P = 0.05) and indication for revision (P = 0.01). Revision of TIPS was associated with lower mortality (26% vs 46%) and significantly lower rates of transplant (13% vs 24%; P = 0.1). In predicting need for TIPS revision, DUS has a 40% sensitivity, 45% specificity, PPV 78%, and NPV 14%. The most accurate location for shunt velocity measure was distal velocity (Area under the curve: 0.79; P = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: DUS has poor overall sensitivity and specificity in predicting need for TIPS revision. Non-invasive methods of predicting TIPS dysfunction are needed since those needing TIPS revision had better survival.

Reduction in Nosocomial Infections in Patients With Cirrhosis During the COVID-19 Era Compared with Pre-COVID-19: Impact of Masking and Restricting Visitation.

Nosocomial infections (NIs) in critically ill patients with cirrhosis result in higher death and transplant delisting. NIs are promoted by staff, visitors, and the environment, all of which were altered to reduce pathogen transmission after COVID-19. Two cohorts of intensive care unit patients with cirrhosis from March 2019 to February 2020 (pre-COVID, n = 234) and March 2020 to March 2021 (COVID era, n = 296) were included. We found that despite a higher admission MELD-Na, qSOFA, and WBC count and requiring a longer intensive care unit stay, COVID-era patients developed lower NIs (3% vs 10%, P < 0.001) and had higher liver transplant rates vs pre-COVID patients. COVID-era restrictions could reduce NIs in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.