Sumping's Up: A Multidisciplinary Educational Initiative on Gastric Drainage Tubes.

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube placement is widely taught, and tube maintenance relies on astute nursing care with adherence to both institutional and evidence-based recommendations. However, precise adherence to current recommendations relies on knowledge base regarding the identification of malfunctioning gastric drainage tubes. Troubleshooting skills are crucial in maintaining patient safety and recognizing malfunction. METHOD: Educational sessions on nasogastric and orogastric decompression tube management, led by a surgical intensive care fellow at a level 1 trauma center, were offered to critical care nurses. A presession and postsession survey evaluated the nurses' subjective and objective knowledge and comfort with naso/orogastric decompression tube management. RESULTS: Ninety-seven critical care RNs participated. For all questions, the proportion of correct answers significantly increased from presession survey to postsession survey (p < .001). Ninety-seven percent of all participants found the session to be very helpful. CONCLUSION: Physician-led educational sessions on naso/orogastric decompression tube management were well-received and improved subjective and objective measurements of nurses' knowledge and comfort level with gastric decompression tubes. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020;51(10):484-488.].

The impact of the repeal of Michigan's universal helmet law on traumatic brain injury: A statewide analysis.

BACKGROUND: In April of 2012, Michigan repealed its 35-year-old universal motorcycle helmet law in favor of a partial helmet law, which permits motorcyclists older than 21 years old with sufficient insurance and experience to drive un-helmeted. We evaluated the clinical impact of the repeal. METHODS: The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program's trauma database was queried for motorcycle crash patients between 1/1/09-4/12/12 and between 4/13/12-12/31/14. RESULTS: There were 1970 patients in the pre-repeal analysis and 2673 patients in the post-repeal analysis. Following the repeal, patients were more likely to be un-helmeted (p < 0.001) and to have a traumatic brain injury (p < 0.001). Patients were also more likely to require neurosurgical interventions (relative risk 1.4, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Following the repeal of the universal helmet law, there has been a significant increase in traumatic brain injuries and neurosurgical interventions. This analysis highlights another detrimental impact of the repeal of the universal helmet law.