Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
3.
Obes Surg ; 24(9): 1420-4, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24658977

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been renewed interest in using robotics in bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, the high cost of a robotic surgical system has hindered its widespread use in developing countries. This study aims to compare the rate of morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between laparoscopic (LSG) and robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) performed for the treatment of obesity in a single center in Brazil. METHODS: From January 2011 to March 2013, 48 severely obese patients underwent either LSG or RSG at our institution and were prospectively followed up for 12 months. Patients were free to choose either approach and were informed of any extra costs that may be incurred. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent LSG and 16 patients, RSG. No significant differences were observed between LSG and RSG groups regarding age, sex, BMI, incidence of comorbidities, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Also, there were no significant between-group differences in BMI values evaluated at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Surgical costs were almost twice as high and total hospital costs were approximately 50 % higher in the robotic approach compared to the laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Both RSG and LSG had excellent and similar post-operative clinical outcomes. However, the much higher costs of purchasing and maintaining the robotic system are still precluding the use of RSG as a routine approach in the treatment of morbid obesity in Brazil.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Custos Hospitalares , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Brasil , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/economia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 23(6): 486-90, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24300922

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central pancreatectomy is an alternative technique for benign or low-grade malignant tumors. Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy has been rarely performed, with only 48 cases reported in the English literature. The aim of this paper was to review all published cases together with 3 cases from our institution. METHODS: All published articles indexed on PubMed were included. Terms used were "laparoscopic central pancreatectomy" or "laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy." Variables studied were the operative time, the type of reconstruction, indications, the use of robotic or hand assistance, blood loss, transfusion, pancreatic fistula, hospital stay, follow-up, development of exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were identified. Twenty-one patients underwent total laparoscopy (41.2%), 27 required robotic assistance (52.9%), one required hand assistance (1.9%), and there were 2 conversions. In 18 cases (35.3%), pancreatic reconstruction involved a Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy, and in 32 cases, pancreatogastrostomy (62.7%). The mean operative time was 356 minutes. Blood loss was minimal in most cases, and only 1 patient required blood transfusion (1.9%). Mortality was nil, but morbidity was high, mainly because of pancreatic fistula (46%). The mean hospital stay was 13.8 days. All patients underwent laparoscopic central pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade neoplasms. The mean follow-up duration was 19.6 months (range, 2 to 48 mo). No patient presented exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy is a feasible and useful technique for the removal of tumors located in the neck of the pancreas. There are very few centers performing this operation, and therefore, a literature review was necessary to identify its indications and technical possibilities, and to promote its use.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Adulto , Anastomose em-Y de Roux , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Robótica
5.
Medicina (Ribeiräo Preto) ; 44(1): 79-86, jan.-mar. 2011.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-644427

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Investigar uma abordagem diferente no manejo do trauma hepático, que consiga preservar o máximo possível o parênquima do órgão, expondo apenas a área lesada à isquemia e posterior reperfusão. METODOLOGIA: Pesquisa de artigos publicados nas bases de dados MedLine e pubMedno período de 1980 a 2010, sobre a abordagem dos pedículos glissonianos, e usando como palavrasde busca: fígado, cirurgia, trauma, veia porta e artéria hepática...


AIM: To investigate a different approach in liver trauma, that preserves as much liver parenchyma as possible, exposing only the injured area to ischemia and reperfusion. MATHERIAL AND METHODS: Medline and pubMed search from 1980 to 2010 about the glissonian approach , including, liver, surgery, trauma, portal vein and hepatic artery as key-words...


Assuntos
Artéria Hepática/cirurgia , Fígado/cirurgia , Fígado/lesões , Veia Porta
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA