Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 185(9): 7749-56, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23435851

RESUMO

Fecal pollution may adversely impact water quality in coastal ecosystems. The goal of this study was to determine whether cattle were a source of fecal pollution in a South Carolina watershed. Surface water samples were collected in June 2002 and February through March 2003 in closed shellfish harvesting waters of Toogoodoo Creek in Charleston County, SC. Fecal coliform concentrations in 70 % of the water samples taken for this study exceeded shellfish harvesting water standards. Ribotyping was performed in order to identify animal sources contributing to elevated fecal coliform levels. Escherichia coli isolates (n = 253) from surface water samples were ribotyped and compared to a ribotype library developed from known sources of fecal material. Ribotypes from water samples that matched library ribotypes with 90 % maximum similarity or better were assigned to that source. Less than half of the unknown isolates (38 %) matched with library isolates. About half (53 %) of the matched ribotypes were assigned to cattle isolates and 43 % to raccoon. Ribotyping almost exclusively identified animal sources. While these results indicate that runoff from cattle farms was a likely source of fecal pollution in the watershed, wildlife also contributed. Given the small size of the library, ribotyping was moderately useful for determining the impact of adjacent cattle farms on Toogoodoo Creek. Increasing the number and diversity of the wildlife sources from the area would likely increase the usefulness of the method.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos , Monitoramento Ambiental , Fezes , Rios/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Animais , Bovinos , Ecossistema , South Carolina , Qualidade da Água
2.
Biol Psychiatry ; 14(4): 587-94, 1979 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-486615

RESUMO

Mice were injected ip with either saline, l-methadone (2.5, 5, 20 mg/kg), perphenazine (1, 10, 15 mg/kg), or chlorprothixene (1.25, 2.5, 15 mg/kg) 30 min prior to mescaline-14C (25 mg/kg). Mescaline-induced behavioral changes such as agitation, excitement, slight increase in ventilation, and fright to sound stimuli were prevented by all doses of three drugs, and head-shaking, scratching, and locomotor-increasing effects by 5 and 20 mg/kg methadone and by all doses of both neuroleptics. Catalepticlike state and moderate to marked hypothermia induced by all doses of chlorprothixene, 10 and 15 mg/kg perphenazine, and 20 mg/kg methadone were not reversed by mescaline. Chlorprothixene (all doses), perphenazine (10, 15 mg/kg), and methadone (5, 20 mg/kg) caused marked retention of mescaline and its deaminated metabolite, 3, 4, 5-trimethoxyphenyl acetic acid in both brain and plasma. The fact that relatively higher doses of methadone than neuroleptics are needed to ensure effective antagonism to mescaline action tends to indicate a less specific interaction of the opiate with the neuroleptic/dopamine receptor proposed for central mescaline effects.


Assuntos
Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mescalina/metabolismo , Mescalina/farmacologia , Metadona/farmacologia , Animais , Biotransformação , Temperatura Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Clorprotixeno/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Asseio Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Mescalina/antagonistas & inibidores , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica/efeitos dos fármacos , Camundongos , Atividade Motora/efeitos dos fármacos , Perfenazina/farmacologia
4.
Anal Chem ; 40(5): 303R+, 1968 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4297216
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA