A Prospective Look at the Prevalence of Setup Electrode-Swap Errors Across Over 450 Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Cases.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is shown to be useful in surgeries when the nervous system is at risk. Its success in part relies upon proper setup of often dozens of electrodes correctly placed and secured upon patients and inserted in specific stimulating and recording receptacles. Given the complicated setups and the demanding operating room environment, errors in setup are bound to occur. These have led to false negatives associated with new patient morbidities including, at times, paralysis. No studies quantify the prevalence of these types of setup errors. Approximately 800,000 operations annually utilize intraoperative neuromonitoring in the US alone, so even a small percentage of errors suggests clinical significance. In addition, these types of errors hinder the overall effectiveness of IONM and may result in lower reported sensitivities and lower cost-effectiveness of this important service. We sought to discover through a prospective study and verification through chart review the prevalence of "electrode-swap" errors (when recording and/or stimulating electrodes are incorrectly placed on the patient or in the IONM equipment during setup) across all procedures monitored. We found recording and/or stimulating electrode set up errors in 24 of 454 cases (5.3%). These data and examples of how errors were discovered intraoperatively are reported. We also offer techniques to help reduce this error rate. This study demonstrates a significant potential avoidable error in IONM diagnostic utility, patient outcome, and sensitivity/specificity of alert criteria. The value of identifying and correcting these errors is consequential, multifaceted, and far-reaching.

There's No "I" in "Team": Recommendations for Effective Teamwork and Communication in IONM.

Effective teamwork is essential in almost every job, and can even mean life, death, or disability in some jobs. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is a career in which effective teamwork and accurate communication are of utmost importance, yet it comes with a unique set of challenges in which to achieve those goals. Operating rooms can be very stressful environments, even if a surgical neurophysiologist (SNP) works in the same hospital every day. Often an SNP is required to travel from hospital to hospital and work with different teams each day. In addition, communication with the IONM oversight professional (IONM-P) can be challenging by nature of the telemedicine model which is becoming the most commonly applied IONM model in the United States. It is unfortunate that such critical skills are assumed and are rarely formally trained. In this article, we present evidence-based recommendations for establishing effective team function. We also provide several tools designed to help create effective and efficient teams. Teams cannot function at their best without outstanding communication, so improving teamwork also means improving communication. This article also provides several techniques for excellent communication, regardless of the situation or context.

Lateralized Periodic Discharges Detected and Described via Intraoperative Neuromonitoring.

This case report details lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) detected and described via intraoperative neuromonitoring during tumor resection. Descriptions and quantifications were made according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 Version. Further, this case illustrates quantitative changes to the LPDs observed in real time as the tumor was removed.

Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children.

The minimum age for cochlear implantation has been reduced to 12 months in an effort to provide auditory stimulation to children with hearing loss during early development. Because behavioral measures in such young children are limited, objective measures such as the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) from the auditory nerve are needed to facilitate measurement of stimulation level requirements. We assessed EAPs recorded by the Nucleus 24 neural response telemetry (NRT) system in children who underwent implantation between 12 and 24 months of age. We recorded EAPs in 37 such children (mean age at implantation, 18.1+/-3.6 months). The EAPs were of large amplitude, and thresholds fell between behavioral T and C levels. A correction factor applied to EAP thresholds provided useful predictions of T levels. The EAPs can be used to ensure that even very young children receive auditory stimulation with their cochlear implants upon device activation.

The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to present psychophysical data for 40 Nucleus 24 Contour adult patients with 1 mo of device experience and speech perception results for a group of 56 adult patients with 3 mo experience using the Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant system. Postoperative hearing thresholds (i.e., under headphones) in the implanted ear were also assessed in a group of 85 patients who had measurable hearing preoperatively. This was of interest because preservation of residual hearing, postoperatively, is consistent with atraumatic insertion of the electrode array. In addition, data will be presented that reflected feedback from 40 surgeons who participated in the trial. DESIGN: Participants in this study were 18 yr of age or older, with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss with no congenital component. Preoperatively, they scored < or = 50% open-set sentence recognition (HINT sentences) in the ear to be implanted and < or = 60% in the best-aided condition. The investigation was a repeated-measures single-subject experiment and took place at 46 different North American clinical sites. Preoperative performance was compared with postoperative performance 3 mo after device activation. Clinicians were able to program patients' processors with one, two, or all three speech-processing strategies. Testing took place using the participant's preferred speech-processing strategy (SPEAK, CIS, or ACE). Preoperative unaided hearing thresholds were compared with unaided thresholds in the implanted ear measured 1 mo after device activation. Surgeons were canvassed regarding surgical use and design of the device via a questionnaire after having completed at least one Nucleus 24 Contour surgery. RESULTS: Average T- and C-levels for the Nucleus 24 Contour patients were considerably lower than those using the Nucleus 24 (CI24M). A total of 85 patients had measurable hearing preoperatively at two or more audiometric frequencies in the ear implanted. Of these patients 41 (48%) had measurable hearing at one or more frequencies and 32 (38%) had measurable hearing at two or more frequencies postoperatively. In general, surgeons found the Nucleus 24 Contour easy to insert and were pleased with the design features of the device. The downsized receiver/stimulator (of the Nucleus 24 Contour) required less drilling than the Nucleus 24, reducing surgical time, as well as making the Contour better suited for implantation in those with small skull sizes (e.g., small children and infants). After 3 mo of device use, mean open-set speech perception in quiet and in noise was significantly better than preoperative performance on all test measures. Patients using the ACE strategy had significantly better mean scores for all measures than patients using SPEAK. Only two patients preferred to use the CIS coding strategy. CONCLUSIONS The results presented in this article demonstrated that the design objectives of the Nucleus 24 Contour were met. Namely, results from this study, together with insertion studies, were consistent with perimodiolar placement using an implant design that the majority of surgeons found easy to insert with relatively minimal trauma. Reduced T- and C-levels were observed with Contour patients when compared with patients using the Nucleus 24 with the straight array, consistent with perimodiolar placement. A survey of surgeons participating in the clinical trial indicated easier, or equally easy, insertion of the Contour array, compared with previous Nucleus products as well as other manufacturers' devices, without the use of additional insertion tools or array positioners. Postoperatively, 46% of patients with preoperative residual hearing maintained some level of unaided hearing postoperatively, suggesting atraumatic insertion of the Nucleus 24 Contour electrode array. It is worth noting that all 216 patients implanted during this study had full insertions of their Contour electrode arrays. High levels of open-set speech perception in quiet and in noise were achieved and patients using the ACE strategy had significantly better mean scores for all measures than patients using SPEAK. Only two patients preferred to use the CIS coding strategy.