Illustrations enhance older colorectal cancer patients' website satisfaction and recall of online cancer information.

This study aims to investigate the effects of illustrations in online cancer information on older cancer patients' website satisfaction (i.e. satisfaction with the attractiveness, comprehensibility and emotional support from the website) and recall of information. In an online experiment, 174 younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) colorectal cancer patients were randomly exposed to a webpage about transanal endoscopic microsurgery consisting of either text-only information, text with two cognitive illustrations or text with two affective illustrations. In general, adding cognitive illustrations compared with text-only information improved the satisfaction with the attractiveness of the website in both younger and older patients. For older patients in particular, cognitive illustrations facilitated recall of cancer information: whereas older patients recalled less information overall compared with younger patients (39% vs. 50%), no statistically significant differences in age on recall were observed when cognitive illustrations were added to text. Furthermore, older patients were more satisfied with the emotional support from the website than younger patients, especially when affective illustrations were present. Our results suggest that effective online cancer communication for ageing populations involves considering both cognitive and affective illustrations to enhance website satisfaction and recall of cancer information.

How can communication by oncologists enhance patients' trust? An experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients need to trust their oncologist to embark in the process of oncologic treatment. Yet, it is unclear how oncologist communication contributes to such trust. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three elements of oncologists' communication on cancer patients' trust: conferring competence, honesty, and caring. METHODS: Eight videotaped consultations, 'vignettes', were created, reflecting an encounter between an oncologist and a patient with colorectal cancer. All vignettes were identical, except for small variations in the oncologist's verbal communication. Cancer patients (n = 345) were randomly assigned to viewing two vignettes, asked to identify with the patient and afterwards to rate their trust in the observed oncologist. The effects of competence, honesty, and caring on trust were established with multilevel analysis. RESULTS: Oncologist's enhanced expression of competence (ß = 0.17, 95% CI 0.08, 0.27; P < 0.001), honesty (ß = 0.30, 95% CI 0.20, 0.40; P < 0.001), as well as caring (ß = 0.36, 95% CI 0.26, 0.46; P < 0.001) resulted in significantly increased trust. Communication of honesty and caring also increased patients' expectation of operation success and reported willingness to recommend the oncologist. CONCLUSION(S): As hypothesized, oncologists can influence their patients' trust by enhanced conveyance of their level of competence, honesty, and caring. Caring behavior has the strongest impact on trust. These findings can be translated directly into daily clinical practice as well as in communication skills training.

The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.

INTRODUCTION: In 2009, the nationwide Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) was initiated by the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands (ASN) to monitor, evaluate and improve colorectal cancer care. The DSCA is currently widely used as a blueprint for the initiation of other audits, coordinated by the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA). This article illustrates key elements of the DSCA and results of three years of auditing. METHODS: Key elements include: a leading role of the professional association with integration of the audit in the national quality assurance policy; web-based registration by medical specialists; weekly updated online feedback to participants; annual external data verification with other data sources; improvement projects. RESULTS: In two years, all Dutch hospitals participated in the audit. Case-ascertainment was 92% in 2010 and 95% in 2011. External data verification by comparison with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) showed high concordance of data items. Within three years, guideline compliance for diagnostics, preoperative multidisciplinary meetings and standardised reporting increased; complication-, re-intervention and postoperative mortality rates decreased significantly. DISCUSSION: The success of the DSCA is the result of effective surgical collaboration. The leading role of the ASN in conducting the audit resulted in full participation of all colorectal surgeons in the Netherlands. By integrating the audit into the ASNs' quality assurance policy, it could be used to set national quality standards. Future challenges include reduction of administrative burden; expansion to a multidisciplinary registration; and addition of financial information and patient reported outcomes to the audit data.

Management of colovesical fistulae caused by diverticulitis: 12 years of experience in one medical centre.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis can be complicated by a colovesical fistula (CVF). This phenomenon is relatively uncommon in surgical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic and surgical management of CVF at our medical centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, details of 31 patients undergoing surgery for CVF between January 1998 and March 2010 were recorded. These patient records were analysed for presenting symptoms, diagnostic investigations and surgical procedures. RESULTS: The most common presenting symptoms were pneumaturia, urinary tract infections, abdominal pain, and fecaluria. CT identified CVF in 28 patients (92.2%), cystoscopy in 4 patients (23.5%), and barium enema in 3 patients (13.6%). Surgical management was resection of the diseased colon segment with primary anastomosis in 29 of 31 patients. The bladder fistulae were oversewn and an omental plasty was placed between bowel anastomosis and bladder. There was only one postoperative leak and one case of mortality (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: CT is the most sensitive test in identifying CVF. Resection of the diseased colon segment and primary anastomosis seems to be an effective and safe surgical method for treating CVF. This surgical treatment has an acceptable risk for anastomotic leak and mortality.

Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in 'textbook outcome'.

AIMS: We propose a summarizing measure for outcome indicators, representing the proportion of patients for whom all desired short-term outcomes of care (a 'textbook outcome') is realized. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital variation in the proportion of patients with a 'textbook outcome' after colon cancer resections in the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients who underwent a colon cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands were included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. A textbook outcome was defined as hospital survival, radical resection, no reintervention, no ostomy, no adverse outcome and a hospital stay < 14 days. We calculated the number of hospitals with a significantly higher (positive outlier) or lower (negative outlier) Observed/Expected (O/E) textbook outcome than average. As quality measures may be more discriminative in a low-risk population, analyses were repeated for low-risk patients only. RESULTS: A total of 5582 patients, treated in 82 hospitals were included. Average textbook outcome was 49% (range 26-71%). Eight hospitals were identified as negative outliers. In these hospitals a 'textbook outcome' was realized in 35% vs. 52% in average hospitals (p < 0.01). In a sub-analysis for low-risk patients, only one additional negative outlier was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The textbook outcome, representing the proportion of patients with a perfect hospitalization, gives a simple comprehensive summary of hospital performance, while preventing indicator driven practice. Therewith the 'textbook outcome' is meaningful for patients, providers, insurance companies and healthcare inspectorate.

Nonelective colon cancer resections in elderly patients: results from the dutch surgical colorectal audit.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess which factors contribute to postoperative mortality, especially in elderly patients who undergo emergency colon cancer resections, using a nationwide population-based database. METHODS: 6,161 patients (1,172 nonelective) who underwent a colon cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands were included. Risk factors for postoperative mortality were investigated using a multivariate logistic regression model for different age groups, elective and nonelective patients separately. RESULTS: For both elective and nonelective patients, mortality risk increased with increasing age. For nonelective elderly patients (80+ years), each additional risk factor increased the mortality risk. For a nonelective patient of 80+ years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III+ and a left hemicolectomy or extended resection, postoperative mortality rate was 41% compared with 7% in patients without additional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients with two or more additional risk factors, a nonelective resection should be considered a high-risk procedure with a mortality risk of up to 41%. The results of this study could be used to adequately inform patient and family and should have consequences for composing an operative team.

Combining process indicators to evaluate quality of care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: are scores consistent with short-term outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if composite measures based on process indicators are consistent with short-term outcome indicators in surgical colorectal cancer care. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of consistency between composite measures based on process indicators and outcome indicators for 85 Dutch hospitals. SETTING: The Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit database, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 4732 elective patients with colon carcinoma and 2239 with rectum carcinoma treated in 85 hospitals were included in the analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All available process indicators were aggregated into five different composite measures. The association of the different composite measures with risk-adjusted postoperative mortality and morbidity was analysed at the patient and hospital level. RESULTS: At the patient level, only one of the composite measures was negatively associated with morbidity for rectum carcinoma. At the hospital level, a strong negative association was found between composite measures and hospital mortality and morbidity rates for rectum carcinoma (p<0.05), and hospital morbidity rates for colon carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: For individual patients, a high score on the composite measures based on process indicators is not associated with better short-term outcome. However, at the hospital level, a good score on the composite measures based on process indicators was consistent with more favourable risk-adjusted short-term outcome rates.

Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS), which aims to measure cancer patients' trust in their oncologist. Structure, reliability and validity were examined. METHODS: Construction of the TiOS was based on a multidimensional theoretical framework. Cancer patients were surveyed within a week after their consultation. Trust, satisfaction, trust in health care, self-reported health and background variables were assessed. Dimensionality, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity were investigated. RESULTS: Data of 423 patients were included (response rate = 65%). After item reduction, the TiOS included 18 items. Trust scores were high. Exploratory factor analysis suggested one-dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis nevertheless indicated a reasonable fit of our four-dimensional theoretical model, distinguishing competence, fidelity, honesty and caring. Internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities were high. Good construct validity was indicated by moderate correlations of trust (TiOS) with satisfaction, trust in health care, willingness to recommend and number of consultations with the oncologist. Exploratory analyses suggested significant correlations of trust with ethnicity and age. CONCLUSIONS: The TiOS reliably and validly assesses cancer patients' trust in their oncologist. The questionnaire can be employed in both clinical practice and future research of cancer patients' trust.

Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine how expected mortality based on case-mix varies between colorectal cancer patients treated in non-teaching, teaching and university hospitals, or high, intermediate and low-volume hospitals in the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the database of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit 2010. Factors predicting mortality after colon and rectum carcinoma resections were identified using logistic regression models. Using these models, expected mortality was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: 8580 patients treated in 90 hospitals were included in the analysis. For colon carcinoma, hospitals' expected mortality ranged from 1.5 to 14%. Average expected mortality was lower in patients treated in high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (5.0 vs. 4.3%, p < 0.05). For rectum carcinoma, hospitals expected mortality varied from 0.5 to 7.5%. Average expected mortality was higher in patients treated in non-teaching and teaching hospitals than in university hospitals (2.7 and 2.3 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, rectum carcinoma patients treated in high-volume hospitals had a higher expected mortality than patients treated in low-volume hospitals (2.6 vs. 2.2% p < 0.05). We found no differences in risk-adjusted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients are not evenly distributed between hospitals. Using the expected mortality as an integrated measure for case-mix can help to gain insight in where high-risk patients go. The large variation in expected mortality between individual hospitals, hospital types and volume groups underlines the need for risk-adjustment when comparing hospital performances.

Treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation.

AIM: We evaluated the results of the Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal arterial ligation (DG-HAL) method in the management of symptomatic grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2005 and March 2006, 110 consecutive patients with symptomatic grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids according to the DG-HAL method were treated. All procedures were performed in daycare under spinal anesthesia. The primary objective was the reduction in hemorrhoidal gradation as determined by proctoscopy; the secondary was patient satisfaction. This was measured by interviewing patients over the telephone. RESULTS: The average age was 47.6 years. 42 patients had grade 2 hemorrhoids, 68 grade 3. An average of 7.3 ligations were placed. Proctoscopy showed that, after 6 weeks, 97 (88%) patients had a significant improvement in their hemorrhoidal gradation. After an average follow-up of 37 weeks, 93 of the 110 (84.5%) patients were satisfied with the postoperative result. Mortality was 0% and morbidity 3%. CONCLUSION: DG-HAL is a safe and effective treatment in the management of symptomatic grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids.

Rectal carcinoma treated with short-term preoperative radiotherapy followed by abdominoperineal resection. Significantly more presacral abscesses with absence of local recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of choice for rectal carcinoma is short-term preoperative radiotherapy (5 x 5 Gy) followed by a total mesorectal excision (TME) of the rectum. This treatment has led to a reduction in local recurrence 2 years after surgery from 8.2 to 2.4%. Side effects of this treatment seem to be marginal and of no consequence. After introduction of short-term preoperative radiotherapy we noticed a rise in the postoperative presacral abscess formation which is difficult to treat and results in readmissions and prolonged hospital stay. Research was needed to investigate whether short-term preoperative radiotherapy can be held accountable for the presumed rise in presacral abscess formation in the treatment of rectal carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed over the period January 2000-October 2004. Two groups were formed. Group 1 existed of 30 patients who underwent a TME of the rectum without short-term preoperative radiotherapy. Group two existed of 35 patients who underwent a TME of the rectum with short-term preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in presacral abscess formation (13 vs. 40%) after introduction of short-term preoperative radiotherapy. Radiotherapy proved to be an important risk factor. Reduction in incidence of local recurrence was not evident. CONCLUSION: We found a significant increase in presacral abscess formation strongly suggestive due to the introduction of short-term preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal carcinoma. We noticed no reduction in incidence of local recurrence. We advocate that additional research is needed in order to formulate extra patient selection criteria for the use of preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer.

[A patient with sclerosing autoimmune pancreaticocholangitis as the cause of recurrent cholangitis following a pylorus-sparing pancreaticoduodenectomy]. / Een patient met scleroserende auto-immune pancreaticocholangitis als oorzaak van recidiverende cholangitis na pylorussparende pancreaticoduodenectomie.

A pylorus-sparing pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in a 67-year-old man because of indications for a carcinoma of the distal common bile duct. Histology of the postoperative specimen, however, revealed a sclerosing inflammation of the distal common bile duct and the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. Initial postoperative recovery was followed by recurrent cholangitis. Stenosis of the choledocho-jejunostomy could not be demonstrated. Instead, repeated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography revealed extensive sclerosis of the intrahepatic bile ducts, which suggested a sclerosing cholangitis associated with an autoimmune pancreatitis: sclerosing autoimmune pancreaticocholangitis. This disorder was recently described; it is characterised by a disorder in the pancreas that is indistinguishable from malignancy by imaging techniques and that is followed by a sclerosing inflammation of the bile ducts. The disease responds well to steroids. The patient described demonstrated a complete clinical and biochemical recovery after initiation ofprednisone therapy.

[The use of a self-expanding stent as palliation or before elective surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal carcinoma]. / Zelfexpanderende stent bij obstruerend colorectaal carcinoom als palliatie of als overbrugging naar electieve chirurgie.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of colorectal stents. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Data were collected on all patients treated at the Deventer Hospital, the Netherlands, between 1 April 1996 and 31 December 2003 in whom the placement of a self-expanding colorectal stent was attempted. Each patient's physician was contacted to inquire about the patient's status, including quality of life with the stent in situ. RESULTS: Stent placement was attempted in 57 patients as palliation (n = 45) or before elective surgery (n = 12). Of the 57 patients, 29 were men and 28 were women, and the mean age was 71 years (range: 46-94). All patients had colorectal carcinoma, except 1 patient with stenosis following ischaemic colitis. Passage of air and faeces occurred immediately after stent expansion in 55 of the 57 patients (96%). Perforation during stent placement occurred in 2 patients, who subsequently underwent colostomy. 4 additional patients required a colostomy due to stent migration within a few hours or days after placement (n = 3) or obstruction by tumor growth after 65 days (n = 1). Patients in the palliative group had an acceptable quality of life. Those who received a stent before elective surgery were able to undergo resection, did not require colostomy, and had no postoperative complications. One patient did not undergo surgery because of extensive metastases. CONCLUSION: A colorectal stent can be used in the palliative treatment of terminal patients with colorectal carcinoma before colostomy is considered. Experiences with stents before elective surgery were also positive.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones: a comparison with ERCP and clinical follow-up.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic potential of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) has improved as a result of evolving technique. MRCP has the advantage of negligible morbidity and mortality in contrast to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study was performed to evaluate MRCP as a replacement for diagnostic ERCP for the suspicion of common bile duct (CBD) stones. METHODS: From 1998 to 2001, MRCP was performed in 202 patients with a suspicion of CBD stones based on medical history (MH), cholestatic liver function tests (CL), both MH and CL or other reasons. ERCP was performed in all patients where MRCP indicated the presence of CBD stones and in those patients with a persistent strong clinical suspicion for CBD stones despite a negative MRCP. RESULTS: In 25 patients, MRCP suggested CBD stones which were proven with ERCP in 24 patients. Despite a negative MRCP, 27 patients had a subsequent ERCP. None of these patients appeared to have CBD stones. In this group, MRCP resulted in 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity in detecting CBD stones. Follow-up of all patients revealed 5 more patients with persistent clinical suspicion or cholestatic liver function values. Assuming CBD stones in these patients, MRCP had a sensitivity of 83 % and a specificity of 99% for this diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In the case of CBD stone suspicion, MRCP should be the diagnostic procedure of choice.

Size of the pancreatic head as a prognostic factor for the outcome of Beger's procedure for painful chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas (DPRHP) according to Beger has been developed as an alternative to pylorus-preserving resection of the pancreatic head for painful chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2000, 36 consecutive DPRHPs were performed. The group was divided into patients with (group 1; n = 23) and without (group 2; n = 13) significant enlargement of the pancreatic head. Pain was the indication for surgery in all patients. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 12 patients, necessitating reoperation in 11. Initial overall results were favourable; significant improvement or complete relief of pain was reported in 27 of 35 patients. Long-term results were obtained in 27 of 30 patients; the overall success rate was 16 of 27, 13 of 16 patients with distinct enlargement of the pancreatic head and 3 of the 11 with minimal or no enlargement (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: DPRHP can be performed with good early results. This effect is sustained in patients with distinct localized disease of the pancreatic head. In those without, the long-term results are disappointing.

Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: influence of a Billroth I versus a Billroth II type of reconstruction on gastric emptying.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a frequent problem after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Important risk factors are the presence of intra-abdominal complications. Searching for other causes, this study evaluates the influence of the type of reconstruction after a pancreatoduodenectomy (Billroth I vs. Billroth II; B I vs. B II on DGE. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed evaluating consecutive patients from two surgical institutes. 174 patients were included (B II type of reconstruction n = 123, period 1992-1996; B I type of reconstruction n = 51, period 1988-1998). DGE was defined by gastric stasis requiring nasogastric intubation for 10 days or more or the inability to tolerate a regular diet on or before the 14th postoperative day. RESULTS: After a B I type of reconstruction, there was significantly longer nasogastric intubation period as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (B I median 13 days, range 4-47, B II median 6 days, range 1-40; p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative commencement of a normal diet. Also significantly more patients had DGE after a B I (76%) as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (32%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a significantly higher incidence of DGE after a B I type of reconstruction as compared with a B II type reconstruction. The etiology remains speculative.

[Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: sensitive and specific diagnostic method for suspected choledolithiasis]. / Magnetische-resonantiecholangiopancreatografie: sensitieve en specifieke onderzoeksmethode bij vermoeden van choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance pancreaticography (MRCP) in the diagnostic process of common bile duct stones. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: All 27 MRCPs performed in the period December 1997-December 1998 in the Deventer Hospital, the Netherlands, were evaluated using chart examination. The group comprised 11 males and 16 females with an average age of 57 years (SD 3.2) with anamnestic or biochemical cholestasis. If at MRCP stones were diagnosed, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was performed. If MRCP was without abnormalities, no further diagnostic procedures were performed. The findings at MRCP were compared with those at ERCP and with the clinical course. The MRCP examinations were performed on a 1.5 Tesla MR unit. RESULTS: In 16 patients MRCP was performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in 5 there after. In 5 MRCP was performed to rule out a biliary cause of acute pancreatitis and in 1 patient because of an elevated alkaline phophatase after laparotomy for an abdominal stab injury. There was one false-positive MRCP result and no false-negative ones. Accordingly, the sensitivity of MRCP for choledocholithiasis was 100% and the specificity 95%.

Pancreatic polypeptide secretion in patients with chronic pancreatitis and after pancreatic surgery.

AIM: We investigated polypeptide (PP) secretion under basal conditions, in response to bombesin infusion and to meal ingestion in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and patients after different types of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Included were patients with CP without (n = 20) and with (n = 30) exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, patients after duodenum preserving resection of the head of the pancreas (DPRHP; n = 20), after Whipple's procedure (n = 19), following distal pancreatectomy (DP; n = 12), and healthy controls (n = 36). RESULTS: In CP patients basal and bombesin stimulated PP levels were significantly (p<0.01) reduced compared to controls only when exocrine insufficiency was present. Meal-stimulated PP secretion was significantly (p<0.01-0.05) reduced in CP patients both with and without exocrine insufficiency. Plasma PP peak increments after bombesin and meal ingestion correlated significantly with exocrine function. Basal PP, meal, and bombesin-stimulated PP secretion had low sensitivities of 22%, 42%, and 60% respectively, in detecting chronic pancreatitis. In patients after pancreatic surgery that included pancreatic head resection (DPRHP or Whipple operation) basal and stimulated PP secretion were significantly (p<0.01-0.05) reduced. CONCLUSION: Basal and meal or bombesin-stimulated PP levels are significantly reduced in patients with CP only when exocrine insufficiency is present. Determination of plasma PP levels has low sensitivity and is not useful in detecting chronic pancreatitis without exocrine insufficiency. In patients after pancreatic surgery, PP secretion is dependent on the type of operation (head vs tail resection).