Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prev Med ; 185: 108044, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908568

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to assess implementation facilitators and challenges for advanced team-based care (aTBC) in a federally qualified health center (FQHC). In aTBC, care team coordinators room patients, perform vitals and agenda setting during patient intake, and remain present alongside providers during patient visits. METHODS: The authors conducted a qualitative post-hoc analysis of the aTBC implementation using data from several sources. They used content analysis to code items as facilitators or challenges and thematic analysis to group those into larger themes. Finally, they applied a priori codes from the revised consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to organize the facilitators and barriers into subdomains. RESULTS: The existing evidence-base around aTBC, the FQHC's ability to pilot and adapt it, and strong implementation leads were key facilitating factors. Challenges included an external shock (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic), aTBC complexity, and uncertainty about whether success required implementation of the full model versus easier-to-integrate smaller components. CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs that wish to implement aTBC models need strong champions and internal structures for piloting, adapting, and disseminating interventions. FQHC leaders must think strategically about how to build support and demonstrate success to improve an FQHC's chances of expanding and sustaining aTBC.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração
2.
Dermatol Surg ; 46(1): 26-30, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, the safety of lidocaine plus epinephrine use in outpatient surgery has come under scrutiny despite its long history of use in outpatient dermatologic procedures and surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of crash cart and other emergency interventions during Mohs micrographic surgery when lidocaine plus epinephrine is used as a local anesthetic and evaluate patient comorbidities associated with these events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in an outpatient Mohs micrographic surgery clinic. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-seven Mohs cases were reviewed from the period of March 2015 to June 2016 with 864 meeting the inclusion criteria of patient weight, medical history, and amount of lidocaine administered recorded. No adverse events requiring emergency intervention with a crash cart or transfer to the emergency department occurred despite a patient population with advanced age and a wide range of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: No serious adverse events requiring emergency intervention were associated with lidocaine with epinephrine doses administered below the Food and Drug Administration recommended maximum. The authors did not find evidence from this study or after a literature search to support the requirement for a crash cart and other emergency equipment to be present during procedures.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia de Mohs/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Simpatomiméticos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intradérmicas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Simpatomiméticos/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA