Competing risks of monomorphic vs. non-monomorphic ventricular arrhythmias in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) study.

AIMS: Ablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) has been shown to reduce shock frequency and improve survival. We aimed to compare cause-specific risk factors for MMVT and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and to develop predictive models. METHODS AND RESULTS: The multicentre retrospective cohort study included 2668 patients (age 63.1 ± 13.0 years; 23% female; 78% white; 43% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 28.2 ± 11.1%). Cox models were adjusted for demographic characteristics, heart failure severity and treatment, device programming, and electrocardiogram metrics. Global electrical heterogeneity was measured by spatial QRS-T angle (QRSTa), spatial ventricular gradient elevation (SVGel), azimuth, magnitude (SVGmag), and sum absolute QRST integral (SAIQRST). We compared the out-of-sample performance of the lasso and elastic net for Cox proportional hazards and the Fine-Gray competing risk model. During a median follow-up of 4 years, 359 patients experienced their first sustained MMVT with appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and 129 patients had their first PVT/VF with appropriate ICD shock. The risk of MMVT was associated with wider QRSTa [hazard ratio (HR) 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.34], larger SVGel (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05-1.30), and smaller SVGmag (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and SAIQRST (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99). The best-performing 3-year competing risk Fine-Gray model for MMVT [time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC(t)AUC) 0.728; 95% CI 0.668-0.788] identified high-risk (> 50%) patients with 75% sensitivity and 65% specificity, and PVT/VF prediction model had ROC(t)AUC 0.915 (95% CI 0.868-0.962), both satisfactory calibration. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated models to predict the competing risks of MMVT or PVT/VF that could inform procedural planning and future randomized controlled trials of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL:www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier:NCT03210883.

Sympathetic toggled paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and recurrent premature atrial contractions in ambulatory patients.

BACKGROUND: Autonomic nerve activity is important in the mechanisms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a single burst of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) can toggle on and off PAF or premature atrial contraction (PAC) clusters. METHODS: Simultaneous recording of SKNA and electrocardiogram (neuECG) recording was performed over 7 days in patients with PAF. RESULTS: In study 1, 8 patients (7 men and 1 woman; age 62 ± 8 years) had 124 episodes of PAF. An SKNA burst toggled both on and off PAF in 8 episodes (6.5%) (type 1), toggled on but not off in 12 episodes (9.7%) (type 2), and toggled on a PAC cluster followed by PAF in 4 episodes (3.2%) (type 3). The duration of these PAF episodes was <10 minutes. The remaining 100 episodes (80.6%) were associated with active SKNA bursts throughout PAF (type 4) and lasted longer than type 1 (P = .0185) and type 2 (P = .0027) PAF. There were 47 PAC clusters. Among them, 24 (51.1%) were toggled on and off, and 23 (48.9%) were toggled on but not off by an SKNA burst. In study 2, 17 patients (9 men and 8 women; age 58 ± 12 years) had <10 minutes of PAF (4, 8, 0, and 31 of types 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). There were significant circadian variations of all types of PAF. CONCLUSION: A single SKNA burst can toggle short-duration PAF and PAC cluster episodes on and off. The absence of continued SKNA after the onset might have affected the maintenance of these arrhythmias.

False Tendons in the Left Ventricle: Implications for Successful Ablation of Left Posterior Fascicular Tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical substrate for left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to describe the endocavitary substrate of the re-entrant loop of LPF-VT. METHODS: A total of 26 consecutive patients with LPF-VT underwent an electrophysiology study and radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: Intracardiac echocardiography imaging observed a 100% prevalence of false tendons (FTs) at the left posterior septal region in all patients, and 3 different types of FTs could be classified according to their location. In 22 patients, a P1 potential could be recorded via the multielectrode catheter from a FT. In 4 patients without a recorded P1 during LPF-VT, the earliest P2 potentials were recorded from a FT in 3 patients, and from a muscular connection between 2 posteromedial papillary muscles in 1 patient. Catheter ablation focused on the FTs with P1 or earliest P2 (in patients without P1) was successful in all 26 patients. After 19 ± 8.5 months of follow-up, no patients had recurrence of LPF-VT. CONCLUSIONS: FTs provide an electroanatomical substrate for LPF-VT and a "culprit FT" may be identified as the critical structure bridging the macro-re-entrant loop. Targeting the "culprit FT" is a novel anatomical ablation strategy that results in long-term arrhythmia-free survival.

Atrial fibrillation mechanisms before and after pulmonary vein isolation characterized by noncontact charge density mapping.

BACKGROUND: The interaction of the pulmonary vein (PV) and putative nonpulmonary triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear and has yet to translate into patient-tailored ablation strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use noncontact mapping to detail the global conduction patterns in paroxysmal and persistent AF and how they are modified during PV ablation. METHODS: Forty patients during AF ablation underwent mapping using a noncontact catheter (AcQMap, Acutus Medical, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) before and after PV isolation (PVI). Propagation history maps were analyzed postprocedure for each patient to categorize conduction patterns into focal, organized reentrant, and disorganized patterns (F-Patterns, O-Patterns, and D-Patterns, respectively). RESULTS: Activation patterns identified by using a noncontact mapping system can be subclassified from 3 main patterns into subtypes (macroreentrant and localized reentrant [MR and LR] subtypes and disorganized 1 and disorganized 2 [D1 and D2] subtypes). Persistent AF demonstrated more D-Patterns and less O-Patterns and F-Patterns than did paroxysmal AF. In addition, patients with PAF inducible after PVI demonstrated a higher region number and higher prevalence of MR subtypes than did those noninducible. PVs remained the critical region and included almost one-third of all patterns across any AF types. PVI was effective to eliminate PV-related functional phenotypes and affected recurrence with other patterns. CONCLUSION: Activation patterns identified using AcQMap can be classified into 3 main patterns (F-Patterns, O-Patterns, and D-Patterns) as well as subtypes (MR and LR subtypes and D1 and D2 subtypes). PerAF was different from PAF in demonstrating a higher region number and higher prevalence of D-Patterns but a lower region number and lower prevalence of O-Patterns and F-Patterns.

Biological substrate modification suppresses ventricular arrhythmias in a porcine model of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Cardiomyopathy patients are prone to ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death. Current therapies to prevent VA include radiofrequency ablation to destroy slowly conducting pathways of viable myocardium which support re-entry. Here, we tested the reverse concept, namely that boosting local tissue viability in zones of slow conduction might eliminate slow conduction and suppress VA in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exosomes are extracellular vesicles laden with bioactive cargo. Exosomes secreted by cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCEXO) reduce scar and improve heart function after intramyocardial delivery. In a VA-prone porcine model of ischaemic cardiomyopathy, we injected CDCEXO or vehicle into zones of delayed conduction defined by electroanatomic mapping. Up to 1-month post-injection, CDCEXO, but not the vehicle, decreased myocardial scar, suppressed slowly conducting electrical pathways, and inhibited VA induction by programmed electrical stimulation. In silico reconstruction of electrical activity based on magnetic resonance images accurately reproduced the suppression of VA inducibility by CDCEXO. Strong anti-fibrotic effects of CDCEXO, evident histologically and by proteomic analysis from pig hearts, were confirmed in a co-culture assay of cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: Biological substrate modification by exosome injection may be worth developing as a non-destructive alternative to conventional ablation for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Delayed repolarization and ventricular tachycardia in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Sudden death is the most common mode of mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) have been suspected as the etiology but the supporting evidence in patients with HFpEF is scarce. We sought to investigate VA prevalence, and to determine if VA are associated with prolonged repolarization, in patients with HFpEF. In a retrospective case-control study design, Cedars-Sinai patients who underwent prolonged ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (Zio Patch) between 2016 and 2018 were screened for a clinical diagnosis of HFpEF. Patients with normal diastolic and systolic function who underwent Zio Patch monitoring were also reviewed as controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the prevalence of rhythm disturbances in patients with and without HFpEF. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was more prevalent in patients with HFpEF (37% vs. 16% in controls, p = 0.001). Most episodes were non-sustained except for one case of sustained VT in a patient with HFpEF. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression including HFpEF diagnosis, age, sex, body mass index, and the presence of comorbidities revealed that only HFpEF was associated with increased risk of VT (relative risk 2.86, p = 0.023). Subgroup-analyses revealed an association between increased QTc interval and risk of VT (460 ± 38 ms in HFpEF patients with VT vs. 445 ± 28 ms in HFpEF patients without VT, p = 0.03). Non-sustained VT was more prevalent in patients with HFpEF compared to patients without HFpEF, and QTc interval prolongation was associated with VT in HFpEF.

Competing risks in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Global electrical heterogeneity (GEH) is associated with sudden cardiac death in the general population. Its utility in patients with systolic heart failure who are candidates for primary prevention (PP) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether GEH is associated with sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation leading to appropriate ICD therapies in patients with heart failure and PP ICDs. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study. GEH was measured by spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) direction (azimuth and elevation) and magnitude, QRS-T angle, and sum absolute QRST integral on preimplant 12-lead electrocardiograms. Survival analysis using cause-specific hazard functions compared the strength of associations with 2 competing outcomes: sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation leading to appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapies. RESULTS: We analyzed 2668 patients (mean age 63 ± 12 years; 624 (23%) female; 78% white; 43% nonischemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 28% ± 11% from 6 academic medical centers). After adjustment for demographic, clinical, device, and traditional electrocardiographic characteristics, SVG elevation (hazard ratio [HR] per 1SD 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.25; P = .004), SVG azimuth (HR per 1SD 1.12; 95% CI 1.01-1.24; P = .039), SVG magnitude (HR per 1SD 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85; P < .0001), and QRS-T angle (HR per 1SD 1.21; 95% CI 1.08-1.36; P = .001) were associated with appropriate ICD therapies. Sum absolute QRST integral had different associations in infarct-related cardiomyopathy (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.60) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.96) (Pinteraction = .022). CONCLUSION: In patients with PP ICDs, GEH is independently associated with appropriate ICD therapies. The SVG vector points in distinctly different directions in patients with 2 competing outcomes.

Cardiac arrhythmias in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A prospective observational study in the western United States.

Arrhythmias have been reported frequently in COVID-19 patients, but the incidence and nature have not been well characterized. Patients admitted with COVID-19 and monitored by telemetry were prospectively enrolled in the study. Baseline characteristics, hospital course, treatment and complications were collected from the patients' medical records. Telemetry was monitored to detect the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. The incidence and types of cardiac arrhythmias were analyzed and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Among 143 patients admitted with telemetry monitoring, overall in-hospital mortality was 25.2% (36/143 patients) during the period of observation (mean follow-up 23.7 days). Survivors were less tachycardic on initial presentation (heart rate 90.6 ± 19.6 vs. 99.3 ± 23.1 bpm, p = 0.030) and had lower troponin (peak troponin 0.03 vs. 0.18 ng/ml. p = 0.004), C-reactive protein (peak C-reactive protein 97 vs. 181 mg/dl, p = 0.029), and interleukin-6 levels (peak interleukin-6 30 vs. 246 pg/ml, p = 0.003). Sinus tachycardia, the most common arrhythmia (detected in 39.9% [57/143] of patients), occurred more frequently in non-survivors (58.3% vs. 33.6% in survivors, p = 0.009). Premature ventricular complexes occurred in 28.7% (41/143), and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 15.4% (22/143) of patients, with no difference between survivors and non-survivors. Sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation were not frequent (seen only in 1.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). Contrary to reports from other regions, overall mortality was higher and ventricular arrhythmias were infrequent in this hospitalized and monitored COVID-19 population. Either disease or management-related factors could explain this divergence of clinical outcomes, and should be urgently investigated.

Inability to capture with increasing current strength: Is this near-field or far-field?

We present a case of wide-complex tachycardia in which the clinical electrophysiological diagnosis was considered to be bundle branch re-entry ventricular tachycardia. A series of ventricular entrainment attempts were performed from the left and right ventricular septum to confirm the diagnosis. Entrainment pacing with a general current output (10 mA) was performed from the right ventricular septum with manifest fusion and a post-pacing interval similar to tachycardia cycle length. Thereafter, another entrainment attempt with a greater current output (20 mA) was performed from the same site. Paradoxically, concealed fusion was demonstrated by selective RB capture only, though there was no clear "RB" potential seen. In this case, we attempt to explain and illustrate the mechanism of paradoxical near-field inability to capture with increasing current strength.

Treatment of atypical pacemaker-mediated tachycardia with ablation of the retrograde atrioventricular nodal pathway.

A 25-year-old runner received a single-lead, VDD pacemaker after ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia complicated by intermittent AV block. The rate-adaptive AV delay algorithm (RAAV), which shortens the sensed AV interval (SAV) at faster atrial rates, was programmed to provide a physiologic SAV with exercise. She developed repetitive, atypical, long-RP pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT) because the RAAV shortened the antegrade SAV and retrograde conduction occurred over the slow AV nodal pathway. PMT was refractory to usual programming solutions. Using high-density electroanatomic mapping, we were able to ablate the retrograde limb of PMT without further damaging AV conduction.

The influence of cryoballoon manipulation on luminal esophageal temperature during ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal injury is related to a reduction in luminal esophageal temperature (LET) in second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation; however, methods to prevent these reductions in temperature have not been well characterized. METHODS: Esophageal temperature was continuously monitored using a LET probe in patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using the second-generation CB. A rotational maneuver of the CB was performed if the initial ablation resulted in a decrease of more than 4℃ in LET. The refrigerant injector near the distal CB pole was used as a fluoroscopic marker to measure the nearest distance between the CB and the LET probe. RESULTS: A total of 52 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. The rotation was applied in 19 patients and 20 PVs (seven left superior pulmonary veins [LSPVs], seven left inferior PVs [LIPVs], and six right inferior PVs [RIPVs]) with a reduction in LET of more than 4℃ during freezing. The nadir temperature of CB applications was similar before and after CB rotation in all PVs. There was significant difference in the minimum LET before and after rotation during freezing in LSPVs (28.4 ± 3.7 vs 32.4 ± 2.3℃, P = .02), LIPVs (28.4 ± 1.4 vs 32.6 ± 2.7, P = .01) and RIPVs (26.1 ± 4.3 vs 34.0 ± 1.3℃, P = .002). The differences in mean balloon to LET distance were measured for all veins before and after rotation; LSPV (right anterior oblique [RAO], 11.0 ± 1.7 vs 13.8 ± 4.5 mm, P = .05); LIPV (RAO, 10.7 ± 4.3 vs 14.6 ± 6.1 mm, P = .03); RIPV (LAO, 11.8 ± 5.5 vs 14.2 ± 5.7 mm, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: CB rotational maneuvers during ablation can prevent significant reduction in LET and may prevent esophageal injury during the procedure.

Permanent-temporary pacemakers in the management of patients with conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Damage to the cardiac conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known adverse outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A permanent-temporary pacemaker (PTPM) is a device that involves an active-fixation lead attached to an external pulse generator taped to the skin. We reviewed the utility of PTPMs as a temporary bridge measure after TAVR in patients with conduction abnormalities that do not meet conventional criteria for PPM placement. METHODS: Between January 01, 2013 and December 31, 2015, we analyzed 67 patients who received PTPM after TAVR. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, type and size of the valve, pre-TAVR electrocardiograms (ECGs), post-TAVR ECGs at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months, and pacemaker interrogation results were reviewed for each patient if available. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 80.5 ± 9.1 years. PTPM were placed for 2.3 ± 2.4 days. Among these patients, 44.8% (n = 30) received a PPM prior to discharge. Male gender (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.05-7.69, p = 0.05) and an increase in QRS duration post-TAVR (p = 0.01) were associated with PPM placement. Pacemaker interrogation data of 11 patients with PPM revealed that 27% (n = 3) had < 1% V-pacing requirements and < 10% A-pacing requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In post-TAVR patients who develop conduction abnormalities that do not meet conventional PPM implantation indications, PTPM safely provides a time period for further assessment and may prevent unnecessary PPM implantation. Male gender and an increase in QRS duration post-TAVR are associated with PPM implantation. Additionally, some patients may recover from their conduction disturbances and demonstrate low pacemaker utilization.

Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification by evaluating electrocardiographic measures of global electrical heterogeneity and clinical outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design for a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

PURPOSE: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival of systolic heart failure (HF) patients who are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). We recently showed that electrocardiographic (ECG) global electrical heterogeneity (GEH) is independently associated with SCD in the community-dwelling cohort and developed GEH SCD risk score. The Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) study is a retrospective multicenter cohort designed with two goals: (1) validate an independent association of ECG GEH with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies and (2) validate GEH ECG risk score for prediction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies in systolic HF patients with primary prevention ICD. METHODS: All records of primary prevention ICD recipients with available data for analysis are eligible for inclusion. Records of ICD implantation in patients with inherited channelopathies and cardiomyopathies are excluded. Raw digital 12-lead pre-implant ECGs will be used to measure GEH (spatial QRST angle, spatial ventricular gradient magnitude, azimuth, and elevation, and sum absolute QRST integral). The primary endpoint is defined as a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia event with appropriate ICD therapy. All-cause death without preceding sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia with appropriate ICD therapy will serve as a primary competing outcome. The study will draw data from the academic medical centers. RESULTS: We describe the study protocol of the first multicenter retrospective cohort of primary prevention ICD patients with recorded at baseline digital 12-lead ECG. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study will inform future trials to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03210883.