Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and its Management with the Dual-Release Formulation of Doxylamine and Pyridoxine.

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is among the most common conditions that pregnant women encounter in the early stages of pregnancy. It can affect up to 85% of pregnant women, thus representing a significant public health concern. NVP results in substantial negative physical, emotional, and financial consequences. Despite its prevalence, the pathogenesis remains elusive. Few guidelines have been published; however, several interventions exist for the symptomatic treatment of NVP. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of modern treatment strategies of NVP with a special focus on the recently approved dual-release formulation of the doxylamine and pyridoxine combination. This combination was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2016 for the treatment of NVP when conservative management fails, and it has been introduced to the American market in April 2018. The maximum plasma concentration (T max ) of doxylamine and pyridoxal-5-phosphate is reached 3.5 h and 15 h, respectively, after administration of one tablet twice daily, or 4.5 h and 0.5 h, respectively, when one tablet is administered just once daily. In addition, the delayed-release combination allows sufficient levels of doxylamine and the active metabolite pyridoxal-5-phosphate in the systemic circulation, providing symptoms relief in the subsequent morning. Hence, the dual-release formulation can improve the quality of life of pregnant women suffering from NVP. Additionally, large epidemiological trials have shown no increased risk of adverse effects to newborns, demonstrating that its use is not teratogenic.

Quantification of Translocation-Specific ctDNA Provides an Integrating Parameter for Early Assessment of Treatment Response and Risk Stratification in Ewing Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictive and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) treated in the EWING2008 trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Plasma samples from 102 patients with EWS enrolled in the EWING2008 trial were obtained before and during induction chemotherapy. Genomic EWSR1 fusion sequence spanning primers and probes were used for highly specific and sensitive quantification of the levels of ctDNA by digital droplet PCR. ctDNA levels were correlated to established clinical risk factors and outcome parameters. RESULTS: Pretreatment ctDNA copy numbers were correlated with event-free and overall survival. The reduction in ctDNA levels below the detection limit was observed in most cases after only two blocks of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) induction chemotherapy. The persistence of ctDNA after two VIDE blocks was a strong predictor of poor outcomes. ctDNA levels correlated well with most established clinical risk factors; an inverse correlation was found only for the histologic response to induction therapy. ctDNA levels did not provide simple representations of tumor volume, but integrated information from various tumor characteristics represented an independent EWS tumor marker with predictive and prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA copy number in the plasma of patients with EWS is a quantifiable parameter for early risk stratification and can be used as a dynamic noninvasive biomarker for early prediction of treatment response and outcome of patients.